网络攻击:社交媒体用户被捕、国家支持的警戒和俄罗斯公民反政府武装

IF 1.4 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Global Crime Pub Date : 2020-02-19 DOI:10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836
Rashid Gabdulhakov
{"title":"网络攻击:社交媒体用户被捕、国家支持的警戒和俄罗斯公民反政府武装","authors":"Rashid Gabdulhakov","doi":"10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article applies Haggerty and Ericson’s surveillant assemblage concept to the recent wave of social media user arrests in Russia. In doing so, it addresses the legislative frameworks applied to online self-expression, depicts the nuances of legal charges pressed against select social media users, assesses the role of formal law enforcement and vigilant citizens recruited to extend the state’s watchful gaze, and elaborates on citizen counter-forces resisting the tightening state control over the digital domain. The article argues that Russia’s internet users appear to be trolled by the ruling elite through the use of obscure legal frameworks and the stampede of actors and practices where select individuals face legal charges for their activities on social media, while other users face no consequences for the same engagements. Such unpredictability stimulates self-censorship, making the system effective by virtue of its dysfunctionality. Methodologically, the study relies on desk research and field interviews.","PeriodicalId":12676,"journal":{"name":"Global Crime","volume":"21 1","pages":"283 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Con)trolling the Web: Social Media User Arrests, State-Supported Vigilantism and Citizen Counter-Forces in Russia\",\"authors\":\"Rashid Gabdulhakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article applies Haggerty and Ericson’s surveillant assemblage concept to the recent wave of social media user arrests in Russia. In doing so, it addresses the legislative frameworks applied to online self-expression, depicts the nuances of legal charges pressed against select social media users, assesses the role of formal law enforcement and vigilant citizens recruited to extend the state’s watchful gaze, and elaborates on citizen counter-forces resisting the tightening state control over the digital domain. The article argues that Russia’s internet users appear to be trolled by the ruling elite through the use of obscure legal frameworks and the stampede of actors and practices where select individuals face legal charges for their activities on social media, while other users face no consequences for the same engagements. Such unpredictability stimulates self-censorship, making the system effective by virtue of its dysfunctionality. Methodologically, the study relies on desk research and field interviews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Crime\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"283 - 305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Crime\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文将哈格蒂和埃里克森的监视集合概念应用于俄罗斯最近的社交媒体用户逮捕浪潮。在此过程中,它阐述了适用于在线自我表达的立法框架,描述了针对特定社交媒体用户的法律指控的细微差别,评估了正式执法部门和为扩大国家监视而招募的警惕公民的作用,并详细阐述了抵制国家对数字领域加强控制的公民反力量。这篇文章认为,俄罗斯的互联网用户似乎受到了统治精英的控制,他们使用了模糊的法律框架,以及行为者和做法的踩踏,其中一些人因在社交媒体上的活动而面临法律指控,而其他用户则不会因为同样的活动而面临任何后果。这种不可预测性刺激了自我审查,使该系统凭借其功能失调而有效。在方法上,这项研究依赖于案头调查和实地访谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(Con)trolling the Web: Social Media User Arrests, State-Supported Vigilantism and Citizen Counter-Forces in Russia
ABSTRACT This article applies Haggerty and Ericson’s surveillant assemblage concept to the recent wave of social media user arrests in Russia. In doing so, it addresses the legislative frameworks applied to online self-expression, depicts the nuances of legal charges pressed against select social media users, assesses the role of formal law enforcement and vigilant citizens recruited to extend the state’s watchful gaze, and elaborates on citizen counter-forces resisting the tightening state control over the digital domain. The article argues that Russia’s internet users appear to be trolled by the ruling elite through the use of obscure legal frameworks and the stampede of actors and practices where select individuals face legal charges for their activities on social media, while other users face no consequences for the same engagements. Such unpredictability stimulates self-censorship, making the system effective by virtue of its dysfunctionality. Methodologically, the study relies on desk research and field interviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Crime
Global Crime CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Global Crime is a social science journal devoted to the study of crime broadly conceived. Its focus is deliberately broad and multi-disciplinary and its first aim is to make the best scholarship on crime available to specialists and non-specialists alike. It endorses no particular orthodoxy and draws on authors from a variety of disciplines, including history, sociology, criminology, economics, political science, anthropology and area studies. The editors welcome contributions on any topic relating to crime, including organized criminality, its history, activities, relations with the state, its penetration of the economy and its perception in popular culture.
期刊最新文献
Are crimes against women in India converging? Some empirical observations A scoping review on what motivates individuals to illegally harvest wildlife Unpacking drug trafficking phenomenon through seaports: lessons from the Italian ports Transplantation theory in terrorism: an exploratory analysis of organised crime and terrorist group expansion A detailed study of a prominent dark web fentanyl trafficking organization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1