审查

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Wesley and Methodist Studies Pub Date : 2019-09-16 DOI:10.2307/j.ctvpj7hmh.72
Wellings
{"title":"审查","authors":"Wellings","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvpj7hmh.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"p EER review first consisted in the establishment by physicians of standards for licensure to practice medicine and surgery. This form has continued to be administered by state departments of education. Another type of peer review was developed for appointment to hospital staffs. In time learned societies set up their own higher standards for admission. For many years the latter groups included a small and exclusive portion of the medical profession. However, for the vast majority of physicians it was possible to spend an entire career in practice without ever coming under review, unless one committed some serious breach of trust or etiquette. This quiet was disturbed in the 193OS by demands that physicians who were engaged in certain specialty practices be certified by examination. The specialty boards were organized to set up standards for training qualifications and for examinations which were designed to test professional knowledge. Enforcement was implemented through economic pressure, in that hospitals were required to have board-certified physicians and surgeons in the several specialties in order to maintain accreditation. In the 1930s there were relatively few places in the United States where residency training could be obtained. Until World War II the certified specialist was a member of the elite of medicine. After World War II there was a great expansion of postgraduate training facilities, accompanied by a broadening of the base of the specialty certifications. The exclusiveness of these certifications soon disappeared but was succeeded by the development of subspecialty boards. One wonders what will happen when most of us are certified","PeriodicalId":40236,"journal":{"name":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review\",\"authors\":\"Wellings\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvpj7hmh.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"p EER review first consisted in the establishment by physicians of standards for licensure to practice medicine and surgery. This form has continued to be administered by state departments of education. Another type of peer review was developed for appointment to hospital staffs. In time learned societies set up their own higher standards for admission. For many years the latter groups included a small and exclusive portion of the medical profession. However, for the vast majority of physicians it was possible to spend an entire career in practice without ever coming under review, unless one committed some serious breach of trust or etiquette. This quiet was disturbed in the 193OS by demands that physicians who were engaged in certain specialty practices be certified by examination. The specialty boards were organized to set up standards for training qualifications and for examinations which were designed to test professional knowledge. Enforcement was implemented through economic pressure, in that hospitals were required to have board-certified physicians and surgeons in the several specialties in order to maintain accreditation. In the 1930s there were relatively few places in the United States where residency training could be obtained. Until World War II the certified specialist was a member of the elite of medicine. After World War II there was a great expansion of postgraduate training facilities, accompanied by a broadening of the base of the specialty certifications. The exclusiveness of these certifications soon disappeared but was succeeded by the development of subspecialty boards. One wonders what will happen when most of us are certified\",\"PeriodicalId\":40236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wesley and Methodist Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wesley and Methodist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj7hmh.72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj7hmh.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

p EER审查首先包括由医生制定行医和手术许可标准。该表格继续由国家教育部门管理。另一种类型的同行评审是为医院工作人员的预约而开发的。随着时间的推移,学术社会制定了自己更高的录取标准。多年来,后一类人只包括医学界的一小部分人。然而,对于绝大多数医生来说,除非有人严重违反信任或礼仪,否则整个职业生涯都有可能在实践中度过,而不会受到审查。这种平静在19世纪30年代被要求从事某些专业实践的医生通过考试认证的要求所扰乱。组织专业委员会是为了制定培训资格标准和旨在测试专业知识的考试标准。强制执行是通过经济压力实施的,因为医院必须在几个专业拥有委员会认证的医生和外科医生,以保持认证。在20世纪30年代,美国可以获得住院培训的地方相对较少。在第二次世界大战之前,这位认证专家一直是医学精英的一员。第二次世界大战后,随着专业认证基础的扩大,研究生培训设施得到了极大的扩展。这些认证的排他性很快就消失了,但后来又发展了子专业委员会。人们想知道,当我们大多数人都获得认证时,会发生什么
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review
p EER review first consisted in the establishment by physicians of standards for licensure to practice medicine and surgery. This form has continued to be administered by state departments of education. Another type of peer review was developed for appointment to hospital staffs. In time learned societies set up their own higher standards for admission. For many years the latter groups included a small and exclusive portion of the medical profession. However, for the vast majority of physicians it was possible to spend an entire career in practice without ever coming under review, unless one committed some serious breach of trust or etiquette. This quiet was disturbed in the 193OS by demands that physicians who were engaged in certain specialty practices be certified by examination. The specialty boards were organized to set up standards for training qualifications and for examinations which were designed to test professional knowledge. Enforcement was implemented through economic pressure, in that hospitals were required to have board-certified physicians and surgeons in the several specialties in order to maintain accreditation. In the 1930s there were relatively few places in the United States where residency training could be obtained. Until World War II the certified specialist was a member of the elite of medicine. After World War II there was a great expansion of postgraduate training facilities, accompanied by a broadening of the base of the specialty certifications. The exclusiveness of these certifications soon disappeared but was succeeded by the development of subspecialty boards. One wonders what will happen when most of us are certified
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The Old Wesleys and ‘the New Luther’: Rethinking the Relationship Between their Soteriologies Every Leaf, Line, and Letter: Evangelicals and the Bible from the 1730s to the Present Hanoverian Oxford and the Fashioning of John Wesley, c.1720–1745 Something Happens Here: Reclaiming the Distinctiveness of Wesley’s Communion Spirituality in Times of Divisiveness Anglican-Methodist Ecumenism: The Search for Church Unity, 1920–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1