地下水稳定值有多稳定?检查行为和身体的决定因素

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Water Resources and Economics Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wre.2022.100195
Siwa Msangi , Mohamad Hejazi
{"title":"地下水稳定值有多稳定?检查行为和身体的决定因素","authors":"Siwa Msangi ,&nbsp;Mohamad Hejazi","doi":"10.1016/j.wre.2022.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we explore the economic value of groundwater in irrigation – both in terms of the way in which it stabilizes water supply for those facing uncertain surface water flows – as well as in the way it augments water supply to farming enterprises beyond what would be available from precipitation or surface water flows alone. These respective components of groundwater's economic value – its ‘stabilization’ and ‘augmentation’ value – have been discussed in the literature before, but we point out some important ways in which they could be diminished if sub-optimal groundwater abstraction is allowed to persist. Groundwater ‘mining’ tends to diminish the augmentation value of groundwater, while leaving the stabilization value unaffected – as long as the resource extraction only manifests itself in terms of increased pumping costs. We illustrate, however, a situation in which even the stabilization value can be attenuated – which arises when constraints to the user's ability to abstract groundwater become binding and prevent her from realizing the stabilizing value that is embodied in the immediate exploitation of the resource. We demonstrate these losses in groundwater's economic value in irrigation through simulating increasingly sub-optimal, non-cooperative and strategic groundwater pumping behavior in a way that has not been done explicitly in the literature, and use a well-studied example from California to give an empirical illustration of our points.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48644,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Economics","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428422000032/pdfft?md5=d722638d1f705106cf7453faff54194e&pid=1-s2.0-S2212428422000032-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How stable is the stabilization value of groundwater? Examining the behavioral and physical determinants\",\"authors\":\"Siwa Msangi ,&nbsp;Mohamad Hejazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wre.2022.100195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we explore the economic value of groundwater in irrigation – both in terms of the way in which it stabilizes water supply for those facing uncertain surface water flows – as well as in the way it augments water supply to farming enterprises beyond what would be available from precipitation or surface water flows alone. These respective components of groundwater's economic value – its ‘stabilization’ and ‘augmentation’ value – have been discussed in the literature before, but we point out some important ways in which they could be diminished if sub-optimal groundwater abstraction is allowed to persist. Groundwater ‘mining’ tends to diminish the augmentation value of groundwater, while leaving the stabilization value unaffected – as long as the resource extraction only manifests itself in terms of increased pumping costs. We illustrate, however, a situation in which even the stabilization value can be attenuated – which arises when constraints to the user's ability to abstract groundwater become binding and prevent her from realizing the stabilizing value that is embodied in the immediate exploitation of the resource. We demonstrate these losses in groundwater's economic value in irrigation through simulating increasingly sub-optimal, non-cooperative and strategic groundwater pumping behavior in a way that has not been done explicitly in the literature, and use a well-studied example from California to give an empirical illustration of our points.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources and Economics\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428422000032/pdfft?md5=d722638d1f705106cf7453faff54194e&pid=1-s2.0-S2212428422000032-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428422000032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428422000032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇论文中,我们探讨了地下水在灌溉中的经济价值——既包括它为那些面临不确定地表水流量的人稳定供水的方式,也包括它为农业企业增加供水的方式,而不仅仅是降水或地表水流量。地下水经济价值的这些组成部分——它的“稳定”和“增加”价值——已经在以前的文献中进行了讨论,但我们指出了一些重要的方法,如果允许次优地下水开采持续下去,它们可能会减少。地下水“开采”往往会降低地下水的增值价值,而不影响稳定价值——只要资源开采只表现为抽水成本的增加。然而,我们举例说明了一种情况,在这种情况下,甚至稳定价值也会减弱- -当对用户抽取地下水的能力的限制变得具有约束力,并阻止她实现立即开采该资源所体现的稳定价值时,就会出现这种情况。我们通过模拟越来越次优的、非合作的和战略性的地下水抽水行为,以一种在文献中没有明确做过的方式,证明了地下水在灌溉中的经济价值的这些损失,并使用来自加利福尼亚州的一个经过充分研究的例子来对我们的观点进行实证说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How stable is the stabilization value of groundwater? Examining the behavioral and physical determinants

In this paper we explore the economic value of groundwater in irrigation – both in terms of the way in which it stabilizes water supply for those facing uncertain surface water flows – as well as in the way it augments water supply to farming enterprises beyond what would be available from precipitation or surface water flows alone. These respective components of groundwater's economic value – its ‘stabilization’ and ‘augmentation’ value – have been discussed in the literature before, but we point out some important ways in which they could be diminished if sub-optimal groundwater abstraction is allowed to persist. Groundwater ‘mining’ tends to diminish the augmentation value of groundwater, while leaving the stabilization value unaffected – as long as the resource extraction only manifests itself in terms of increased pumping costs. We illustrate, however, a situation in which even the stabilization value can be attenuated – which arises when constraints to the user's ability to abstract groundwater become binding and prevent her from realizing the stabilizing value that is embodied in the immediate exploitation of the resource. We demonstrate these losses in groundwater's economic value in irrigation through simulating increasingly sub-optimal, non-cooperative and strategic groundwater pumping behavior in a way that has not been done explicitly in the literature, and use a well-studied example from California to give an empirical illustration of our points.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources and Economics
Water Resources and Economics Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Water Resources and Economics is one of a series of specialist titles launched by the highly-regarded Water Research. For the purpose of sustainable water resources management, understanding the multiple connections and feedback mechanisms between water resources and the economy is crucial. Water Resources and Economics addresses the financial and economic dimensions associated with water resources use and governance, across different economic sectors like agriculture, energy, industry, shipping, recreation and urban and rural water supply, at local, regional and transboundary scale. Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to) the economics of: Aquatic ecosystem services- Blue economy- Climate change and flood risk management- Climate smart agriculture- Coastal management- Droughts and water scarcity- Environmental flows- Eutrophication- Food, water, energy nexus- Groundwater management- Hydropower generation- Hydrological risks and uncertainties- Marine resources- Nature-based solutions- Resource recovery- River restoration- Storm water harvesting- Transboundary water allocation- Urban water management- Wastewater treatment- Watershed management- Water health risks- Water pollution- Water quality management- Water security- Water stress- Water technology innovation.
期刊最新文献
Identifying optimal funding allocations for public water infrastructure improvements under uncertainty Interregional watershed services: Valuation of the benefits of controlled embankment breaches to manage urban flood risk Sensitivity of water reallocation performance assessments to water use data Impacts of intermittent water supply on household electricity demand: An econometric analysis for the Pune Metropolitan Region, India Capturing the drivers of crop water footprints in Africa and its spatial patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1