玛格丽特·卡文迪许和露西·哈钦森诗歌中的非原子主义与原子认识论

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/726202
Liza Blake
{"title":"玛格丽特·卡文迪许和露西·哈钦森诗歌中的非原子主义与原子认识论","authors":"Liza Blake","doi":"10.1086/726202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neither Margaret Cavendish nor Lucy Hutchinson was ever an atomist or believed that atomic matter made up the universe, and this essay argues that we need to re-narrate the way we describe the development of Cavendish’s natural philosophy, as Cavendish is neither espousing atomism nor engaging with Lucretius in the atomic poetry that appears in her first publication. Nevertheless, both Hutchinson and Cavendish engage with atomism in their poetry. These two poets turn to atomism not because they hold atomic philosophical beliefs, but because atomism helps them to ask questions about what and how it is possible to know, including—for Cavendish as well as Hutchinson—in the realm of theology. Their poetic engagements with atomic philosophy allow each of them to carve out space for epistemologies beyond empiricism. [L.B.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Atomic Atomisms and Atomic Epistemologies in the Poetry of Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson\",\"authors\":\"Liza Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neither Margaret Cavendish nor Lucy Hutchinson was ever an atomist or believed that atomic matter made up the universe, and this essay argues that we need to re-narrate the way we describe the development of Cavendish’s natural philosophy, as Cavendish is neither espousing atomism nor engaging with Lucretius in the atomic poetry that appears in her first publication. Nevertheless, both Hutchinson and Cavendish engage with atomism in their poetry. These two poets turn to atomism not because they hold atomic philosophical beliefs, but because atomism helps them to ask questions about what and how it is possible to know, including—for Cavendish as well as Hutchinson—in the realm of theology. Their poetic engagements with atomic philosophy allow each of them to carve out space for epistemologies beyond empiricism. [L.B.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":44199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玛格丽特·卡文迪什和露西·哈钦森都不是原子论者,也不相信原子物质构成了宇宙,本文认为我们需要重新叙述我们描述卡文迪什自然哲学发展的方式,因为卡文迪什既不支持原子论,也不参与卢克莱修在她第一次出版的原子诗中。然而,哈钦森和卡文迪什在他们的诗歌中都涉及到原子论。这两位诗人转向原子论,不是因为他们持有原子哲学信仰,而是因为原子论帮助他们提出了关于什么是可能知道的以及如何可能知道的问题,包括——对卡文迪什和哈钦森来说——神学领域的问题。他们与原子哲学的诗意接触使他们每个人都为超越经验主义的认识论开辟了空间。(第2)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-Atomic Atomisms and Atomic Epistemologies in the Poetry of Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson
Neither Margaret Cavendish nor Lucy Hutchinson was ever an atomist or believed that atomic matter made up the universe, and this essay argues that we need to re-narrate the way we describe the development of Cavendish’s natural philosophy, as Cavendish is neither espousing atomism nor engaging with Lucretius in the atomic poetry that appears in her first publication. Nevertheless, both Hutchinson and Cavendish engage with atomism in their poetry. These two poets turn to atomism not because they hold atomic philosophical beliefs, but because atomism helps them to ask questions about what and how it is possible to know, including—for Cavendish as well as Hutchinson—in the realm of theology. Their poetic engagements with atomic philosophy allow each of them to carve out space for epistemologies beyond empiricism. [L.B.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Sidney’s Penetrations: Metaphors and Ideas Margaret Russell, Countess of Cumberland’s Letter to John Layfield: Composing Grief through Consolation and Lamentation A Proof of Pleasure: Renaissance in Rancière, Auerbach, Marlowe Lucy Hutchinson’s Everyday War: The 1640s Manuscript and her Restoration ‘Elegies’ “Noe dish whose tast, or dressing, is unknown / Unto oʳ natives”: Local and Global Material Cultures in the Food Rituals of Thomas Salusbury’s 1634 “Chirk Castle Entertainment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1