绿瓶子的碎片:威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯与面向对象本体论

IF 0.1 0 POETRY WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-11-23 DOI:10.1353/wcw.2019.0008
Michael Delgado
{"title":"绿瓶子的碎片:威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯与面向对象本体论","authors":"Michael Delgado","doi":"10.1353/wcw.2019.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article presents a reading of William Carlos Williams's poetry and poetics through the lens of object-oriented ontology (OOO). While much critical attention has been devoted to Williams's preoccupation with objects, OOO is here seen to provide a rich philosophical framework for his object thought, because OOO allows space for the notion that objects, by their nature, evade human understanding. This is demonstrated through an extended analysis of Kora in Hell alongside Marcel Duchamp's Large Glass, in which similarities between the two works are traced—specifically regarding their shared ontological opacity. The article then discusses the implications of OOO's conception of ontological democracy (or 'flat ontology') for Williams's own egalitarian impulses. An OOO reading of Williams's work is ultimately seen to be more suited to his short poems than it is to such a work as Paterson, which it is argued is fundamentally epistemologically focused.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":"36 1","pages":"64 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/wcw.2019.0008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Well-Wrought Broken Pieces of a Green Bottle: William Carlos Williams and Object-Oriented Ontology\",\"authors\":\"Michael Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wcw.2019.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article presents a reading of William Carlos Williams's poetry and poetics through the lens of object-oriented ontology (OOO). While much critical attention has been devoted to Williams's preoccupation with objects, OOO is here seen to provide a rich philosophical framework for his object thought, because OOO allows space for the notion that objects, by their nature, evade human understanding. This is demonstrated through an extended analysis of Kora in Hell alongside Marcel Duchamp's Large Glass, in which similarities between the two works are traced—specifically regarding their shared ontological opacity. The article then discusses the implications of OOO's conception of ontological democracy (or 'flat ontology') for Williams's own egalitarian impulses. An OOO reading of Williams's work is ultimately seen to be more suited to his short poems than it is to such a work as Paterson, which it is argued is fundamentally epistemologically focused.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"64 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/wcw.2019.0008\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wcw.2019.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wcw.2019.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

文摘:本文从面向对象本体论的角度解读威廉姆斯的诗歌与诗学。虽然很多批判性的注意力都集中在威廉姆斯对物体的关注上,但OOO在这里被认为为他的物体思想提供了一个丰富的哲学框架,因为OOO为物体本质上逃避人类理解的概念提供了空间。这一点可以通过对《地狱中的可拉》和马塞尔·杜尚的《大玻璃》的扩展分析来证明,在分析中,可以追溯到这两部作品之间的相似之处,特别是关于它们共同的本体论不透明性。然后,文章讨论了OOO的本体论民主(或“扁平本体论”)概念对威廉姆斯自己的平等主义冲动的影响。对威廉姆斯作品的OOO阅读最终被认为更适合他的短诗,而不是像帕特森这样的作品,人们认为帕特森从根本上是以认识论为中心的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Well-Wrought Broken Pieces of a Green Bottle: William Carlos Williams and Object-Oriented Ontology
abstract:This article presents a reading of William Carlos Williams's poetry and poetics through the lens of object-oriented ontology (OOO). While much critical attention has been devoted to Williams's preoccupation with objects, OOO is here seen to provide a rich philosophical framework for his object thought, because OOO allows space for the notion that objects, by their nature, evade human understanding. This is demonstrated through an extended analysis of Kora in Hell alongside Marcel Duchamp's Large Glass, in which similarities between the two works are traced—specifically regarding their shared ontological opacity. The article then discusses the implications of OOO's conception of ontological democracy (or 'flat ontology') for Williams's own egalitarian impulses. An OOO reading of Williams's work is ultimately seen to be more suited to his short poems than it is to such a work as Paterson, which it is argued is fundamentally epistemologically focused.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Invisible Labor in William Carlos Williams A New Language for a New Perception: A Study of the Influence of Chinese Poetry on the Composition of Spring and All William Carlos Williams and Emily Dickinson Wellcome: The Conflict of the Doctor Persona and the Christian Science Anima William Carlos Williams Bibliography 2022 William Carlos Williams and the Subject of Aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1