经济增长与物质幸福:和解的尝试

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Tocqueville Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.3138/TTR.42.1.33
Gérard Cornilleau, Pierre Madec
{"title":"经济增长与物质幸福:和解的尝试","authors":"Gérard Cornilleau, Pierre Madec","doi":"10.3138/TTR.42.1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The measurement of well-being and its evolution is an open question. A suggested indicator, which is limited to the measure of material well-being, is based on taking into account the \"relative\" nature of a generation's level of well-being and the \"absolute\" impact of lifetime income growth. The assumption is that each individual has a level of well-being at birth that is proportional to the relative income available to his or her family. Subsequently, the well-being of each individual evolves as the real income available to him. In the long term, this indicator depends on the distribution of income (a reduction in inequality increases social welfare) and the growth rate of the economy, with rising per capita income leading to a sustainable increase in well-being, since lifelong generations enjoy higher well-being. It also evolves positively with lifespan and aging, as the share of generations that have benefited from increased well-being over life is increasing. The calculation of this indicator for France and the United States from 1950 to 2019 shows that well-being in France increased very sharply from the 1950s to the 1970s before stagnating since the 1980s. In the United States, the evolution of well-being has been much more consistent. Since the 2008 crisis, aggregate well-being has tended to decline in both countries as growth decline and inequality increase. Generations born after 1970 are much less favourable than previous generations, with the difference in well-being at the same age being particularly marked for those born since 1980.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"33 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Growth and Material Well-being: An Attempt at Reconciliation\",\"authors\":\"Gérard Cornilleau, Pierre Madec\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/TTR.42.1.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The measurement of well-being and its evolution is an open question. A suggested indicator, which is limited to the measure of material well-being, is based on taking into account the \\\"relative\\\" nature of a generation's level of well-being and the \\\"absolute\\\" impact of lifetime income growth. The assumption is that each individual has a level of well-being at birth that is proportional to the relative income available to his or her family. Subsequently, the well-being of each individual evolves as the real income available to him. In the long term, this indicator depends on the distribution of income (a reduction in inequality increases social welfare) and the growth rate of the economy, with rising per capita income leading to a sustainable increase in well-being, since lifelong generations enjoy higher well-being. It also evolves positively with lifespan and aging, as the share of generations that have benefited from increased well-being over life is increasing. The calculation of this indicator for France and the United States from 1950 to 2019 shows that well-being in France increased very sharply from the 1950s to the 1970s before stagnating since the 1980s. In the United States, the evolution of well-being has been much more consistent. Since the 2008 crisis, aggregate well-being has tended to decline in both countries as growth decline and inequality increase. Generations born after 1970 are much less favourable than previous generations, with the difference in well-being at the same age being particularly marked for those born since 1980.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.42.1.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.42.1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:幸福感的测量及其演变是一个悬而未决的问题。一个建议的指标仅限于衡量物质福利,其基础是考虑到一代人福利水平的“相对”性质和一生收入增长的“绝对”影响。假设每个人出生时的幸福水平与他或她家庭的相对收入成正比。随后,每个人的福祉演变为他可以获得的实际收入。从长期来看,这一指标取决于收入分配(减少不平等会增加社会福利)和经济增长率,人均收入的增加会导致福祉的持续增长,因为终身代人享有更高的福祉。它还随着寿命和老龄化而积极发展,因为受益于生活中幸福程度提高的几代人的比例正在增加。对1950年至2019年法国和美国的这一指标的计算表明,法国的幸福感在20世纪50年代至70年代期间急剧上升,但自20世纪80年代以来停滞不前。在美国,幸福感的演变更加一致。自2008年危机以来,随着经济增长放缓和不平等加剧,两国的总体幸福感都趋于下降。1970年以后出生的人比前几代人的幸福感差得多,1980年以后出生的人在同一年龄段的幸福感差异尤其明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic Growth and Material Well-being: An Attempt at Reconciliation
Abstract:The measurement of well-being and its evolution is an open question. A suggested indicator, which is limited to the measure of material well-being, is based on taking into account the "relative" nature of a generation's level of well-being and the "absolute" impact of lifetime income growth. The assumption is that each individual has a level of well-being at birth that is proportional to the relative income available to his or her family. Subsequently, the well-being of each individual evolves as the real income available to him. In the long term, this indicator depends on the distribution of income (a reduction in inequality increases social welfare) and the growth rate of the economy, with rising per capita income leading to a sustainable increase in well-being, since lifelong generations enjoy higher well-being. It also evolves positively with lifespan and aging, as the share of generations that have benefited from increased well-being over life is increasing. The calculation of this indicator for France and the United States from 1950 to 2019 shows that well-being in France increased very sharply from the 1950s to the 1970s before stagnating since the 1980s. In the United States, the evolution of well-being has been much more consistent. Since the 2008 crisis, aggregate well-being has tended to decline in both countries as growth decline and inequality increase. Generations born after 1970 are much less favourable than previous generations, with the difference in well-being at the same age being particularly marked for those born since 1980.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
La conversion de l'histoire est-elle possible ? Les limites de l'influence de Carl Schmitt sur Raymond Aron : le concept de souveraineté de l'État et celui de l'hostilité absolue The American Red Cross and Disaster Relief in the 1960s: Nonprofits and Mass Philanthropy in an Era of Rising Expectations Comprendre "L'homme qui comprit la démocratie": Table ronde autour de l'ouvrage d'Olivier Zunz Getting Inequality Right: A Zunzian Perspective on the Reformulation of the American Promise The People's Branch: The U.S. Congress and the Democratic State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1