{"title":"土家族的名词化与相对化","authors":"Lu Man, J. V. D. Weijer, Zhengguang Liu","doi":"10.1075/LTBA.16021.MAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a preliminary investigation of\n nominalization and relativization in Tujia from a typological perspective. We\n show that there are several nominalizers in Tujia, only two of which are\n multifunctional: ɕi and ɲie. ɕi can function\n as a nominalizer, a relativizer, a complementizer, a converbal clause marker or\n a stance marker. ɲie can function as a genitive marker, a\n nominalizer, a relative clause marker, a non-relative attributive marker or a\n stance marker. Relative clauses in Tujia can be head internal and pre-nominal.\n The head internal relative clauses are marked by ɕi, while the\n pre-nominal relative clauses are marked by ɲie.1 We point out that ɲie\n manifests typical genitive-relative-nominalization syncretism, whereas\n ɕi manifests extended nominalization functions, both of\n which are widely attested in other Tibeto-Burman languages. We argue that\n ɕi originates from a general noun, of unknown etymology.\n The nominalizer ɲie originates from a genitive marker. These\n findings should prove useful to future typological or comparative research with\n respect to nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages.","PeriodicalId":41542,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nominalization and relativization in Tujia\",\"authors\":\"Lu Man, J. V. D. Weijer, Zhengguang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LTBA.16021.MAN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents a preliminary investigation of\\n nominalization and relativization in Tujia from a typological perspective. We\\n show that there are several nominalizers in Tujia, only two of which are\\n multifunctional: ɕi and ɲie. ɕi can function\\n as a nominalizer, a relativizer, a complementizer, a converbal clause marker or\\n a stance marker. ɲie can function as a genitive marker, a\\n nominalizer, a relative clause marker, a non-relative attributive marker or a\\n stance marker. Relative clauses in Tujia can be head internal and pre-nominal.\\n The head internal relative clauses are marked by ɕi, while the\\n pre-nominal relative clauses are marked by ɲie.1 We point out that ɲie\\n manifests typical genitive-relative-nominalization syncretism, whereas\\n ɕi manifests extended nominalization functions, both of\\n which are widely attested in other Tibeto-Burman languages. We argue that\\n ɕi originates from a general noun, of unknown etymology.\\n The nominalizer ɲie originates from a genitive marker. These\\n findings should prove useful to future typological or comparative research with\\n respect to nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LTBA.16021.MAN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LTBA.16021.MAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper presents a preliminary investigation of
nominalization and relativization in Tujia from a typological perspective. We
show that there are several nominalizers in Tujia, only two of which are
multifunctional: ɕi and ɲie. ɕi can function
as a nominalizer, a relativizer, a complementizer, a converbal clause marker or
a stance marker. ɲie can function as a genitive marker, a
nominalizer, a relative clause marker, a non-relative attributive marker or a
stance marker. Relative clauses in Tujia can be head internal and pre-nominal.
The head internal relative clauses are marked by ɕi, while the
pre-nominal relative clauses are marked by ɲie.1 We point out that ɲie
manifests typical genitive-relative-nominalization syncretism, whereas
ɕi manifests extended nominalization functions, both of
which are widely attested in other Tibeto-Burman languages. We argue that
ɕi originates from a general noun, of unknown etymology.
The nominalizer ɲie originates from a genitive marker. These
findings should prove useful to future typological or comparative research with
respect to nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages.