{"title":"迈向更有动机的支持性阅读干预:从年轻dll对纯英语课程的看法中学习","authors":"J. Erickson, Kelsey E. Davison, Sarah Markmann","doi":"10.1177/14687984231186086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How willing to participate in supplemental reading intervention programs are young dual language learners (DLLs)? Here we employ a qualitative case study design to consider two kindergarten and one first-grade DLLs’ motivation for doing reading tasks within a school-based, pull-out, English-only, reading intervention. Focal children’s motivation-related perceptions were elicited with two participatory interviews. Responses were compared with adults’ evaluations of the children’s behavioral engagement specific to the intervention. All DLLs shared their perceived benefits and costs of intervention involvement and made recommendations for improvement. Exercising autonomy within the intervention was found to be motivating for all children. The degree to which the intervention supported DLLs in sustaining valued connections with friends, family, and teachers also appeared to have a significant influence on motivation. The findings align with and extend existing literature that explores the reading motivation of older DLLs and young monolingual English speakers' motivations for reading within intervention programs. Collectively, findings imply that motivation theory and research, along with DLLs' own program-specific feedback, should inform intervention design and delivery.","PeriodicalId":47033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward more motivationally-supportive reading interventions: Learning from young DLLs’ perceptions of English-only programmes\",\"authors\":\"J. Erickson, Kelsey E. Davison, Sarah Markmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14687984231186086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How willing to participate in supplemental reading intervention programs are young dual language learners (DLLs)? Here we employ a qualitative case study design to consider two kindergarten and one first-grade DLLs’ motivation for doing reading tasks within a school-based, pull-out, English-only, reading intervention. Focal children’s motivation-related perceptions were elicited with two participatory interviews. Responses were compared with adults’ evaluations of the children’s behavioral engagement specific to the intervention. All DLLs shared their perceived benefits and costs of intervention involvement and made recommendations for improvement. Exercising autonomy within the intervention was found to be motivating for all children. The degree to which the intervention supported DLLs in sustaining valued connections with friends, family, and teachers also appeared to have a significant influence on motivation. The findings align with and extend existing literature that explores the reading motivation of older DLLs and young monolingual English speakers' motivations for reading within intervention programs. Collectively, findings imply that motivation theory and research, along with DLLs' own program-specific feedback, should inform intervention design and delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231186086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231186086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward more motivationally-supportive reading interventions: Learning from young DLLs’ perceptions of English-only programmes
How willing to participate in supplemental reading intervention programs are young dual language learners (DLLs)? Here we employ a qualitative case study design to consider two kindergarten and one first-grade DLLs’ motivation for doing reading tasks within a school-based, pull-out, English-only, reading intervention. Focal children’s motivation-related perceptions were elicited with two participatory interviews. Responses were compared with adults’ evaluations of the children’s behavioral engagement specific to the intervention. All DLLs shared their perceived benefits and costs of intervention involvement and made recommendations for improvement. Exercising autonomy within the intervention was found to be motivating for all children. The degree to which the intervention supported DLLs in sustaining valued connections with friends, family, and teachers also appeared to have a significant influence on motivation. The findings align with and extend existing literature that explores the reading motivation of older DLLs and young monolingual English speakers' motivations for reading within intervention programs. Collectively, findings imply that motivation theory and research, along with DLLs' own program-specific feedback, should inform intervention design and delivery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy is a fully peer-reviewed international journal. Since its foundation in 2001 JECL has rapidly become a distinctive, leading voice in research in early childhood literacy, with a multinational range of contributors and readership. The main emphasis in the journal is on papers researching issues related to the nature, function and use of literacy in early childhood. This includes the history, development, use, learning and teaching of literacy, as well as policy and strategy. Research papers may address theoretical, methodological, strategic or applied aspects of early childhood literacy and could be reviews of research issues. JECL is both a forum for debate about the topic of early childhood literacy and a resource for those working in the field. Literacy is broadly defined; JECL focuses on the 0-8 age range. Our prime interest in empirical work is those studies that are situated in authentic or naturalistic settings; this differentiates the journal from others in the area. JECL, therefore, tends to favour qualitative work but is also open to research employing quantitative methods. The journal is multi-disciplinary. We welcome submissions from diverse disciplinary backgrounds including: education, cultural psychology, literacy studies, sociology, anthropology, historical and cultural studies, applied linguistics and semiotics.