作物轮作中地下带状家禽粪便的最佳播种距离评估

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural & Environmental Letters Pub Date : 2022-01-30 DOI:10.1002/ael2.20063
A. J. Ashworth, C. C. Nieman
{"title":"作物轮作中地下带状家禽粪便的最佳播种距离评估","authors":"A. J. Ashworth,&nbsp;C. C. Nieman","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Poultry litter is a nutrient-dense fertilizer, but surface applications lead to nutrient losses to air, soil, and water. Objectives were to evaluate optimum subsurface-applied poultry litter bands from crop seeding distance in a corn (<i>Zea Mays</i> L.)–soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation. Soil amendment treatments included planting 13, 25, and 38 cm from subsurface-banded poultry litter, surface-applied poultry litter, inorganic nitrogen (N), and 0 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> (control) in Year 1, followed by soybean in Year 2 (no new soil amendment applications). Across subsurface treatments, corn grain and silage yields were 45 and 30% greater compared with surface applications, respectively, with inorganic N not differing from 25- and 38-cm bands during grain harvest. In Year 2, subsurface-banded soybean grain yields were 26% greater than with inorganic N. Consequently, subsurface banding poultry litter may be an ecologically and agronomicallyviable replacement for surface litter applications in corn silage and grain systems and inorganic N in corn–soybean rotations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating optimum seeding distances from subsurface banding poultry litter in crop rotations\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Ashworth,&nbsp;C. C. Nieman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ael2.20063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Poultry litter is a nutrient-dense fertilizer, but surface applications lead to nutrient losses to air, soil, and water. Objectives were to evaluate optimum subsurface-applied poultry litter bands from crop seeding distance in a corn (<i>Zea Mays</i> L.)–soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation. Soil amendment treatments included planting 13, 25, and 38 cm from subsurface-banded poultry litter, surface-applied poultry litter, inorganic nitrogen (N), and 0 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> (control) in Year 1, followed by soybean in Year 2 (no new soil amendment applications). Across subsurface treatments, corn grain and silage yields were 45 and 30% greater compared with surface applications, respectively, with inorganic N not differing from 25- and 38-cm bands during grain harvest. In Year 2, subsurface-banded soybean grain yields were 26% greater than with inorganic N. Consequently, subsurface banding poultry litter may be an ecologically and agronomicallyviable replacement for surface litter applications in corn silage and grain systems and inorganic N in corn–soybean rotations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20063\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家禽粪便是一种营养密集的肥料,但表面施用会导致营养物质流失到空气、土壤和水中。目的是根据玉米(Zea Mays L.) -大豆[Glycine max (L.)]作物播种距离,评价最佳地表下施用家禽凋落物带。稳定。)旋转。土壤改良剂处理包括在第一年种植13、25和38厘米的地下带状家禽凋落物、地表施用家禽凋落物、无机氮(N)和0 kg N ha - 1(对照),然后在第二年种植大豆(不施用新的土壤改良剂)。在地下处理中,玉米籽粒和青贮产量分别比地表施用高45%和30%,在谷物收获期间,无机氮在25 - cm和38 - cm波段上没有差异。在第2年,地下带状处理的大豆籽粒产量比施用无机氮的大豆籽粒产量高出26%。因此,地下带状处理的家禽凋落物在生态和农艺学上可能是玉米青贮和粮食系统中地表凋落物施用和玉米-大豆轮作中无机氮施用的可行替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating optimum seeding distances from subsurface banding poultry litter in crop rotations

Poultry litter is a nutrient-dense fertilizer, but surface applications lead to nutrient losses to air, soil, and water. Objectives were to evaluate optimum subsurface-applied poultry litter bands from crop seeding distance in a corn (Zea Mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation. Soil amendment treatments included planting 13, 25, and 38 cm from subsurface-banded poultry litter, surface-applied poultry litter, inorganic nitrogen (N), and 0 kg N ha−1 (control) in Year 1, followed by soybean in Year 2 (no new soil amendment applications). Across subsurface treatments, corn grain and silage yields were 45 and 30% greater compared with surface applications, respectively, with inorganic N not differing from 25- and 38-cm bands during grain harvest. In Year 2, subsurface-banded soybean grain yields were 26% greater than with inorganic N. Consequently, subsurface banding poultry litter may be an ecologically and agronomicallyviable replacement for surface litter applications in corn silage and grain systems and inorganic N in corn–soybean rotations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The influence of climate on varietal similarities across countries Our connections to soil health through simile When are you measuring soil β-glucosidase activities in cropping systems? Soil organic matter characteristics of four soil types under different conservation strategies across Hubei Province A tool for integrating agrometeorological observation data for digital agriculture: A Minnesota case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1