内部观点和行动原因

Gianella Bardazano
{"title":"内部观点和行动原因","authors":"Gianella Bardazano","doi":"10.22187/RFD2019N47A13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article intends to account for the importance of internal point of view to understand the concept of law, having into account Raz’s distancing regarding Hart on this issue, to whom he concedes conceptual primacy. In this sense, for the legal systems’ conceptual analysis, the epistemic privilege conferred to internal point of view articulates with the conception of rules as exclusive reasons.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El punto de vista interno y las razones para la acción\",\"authors\":\"Gianella Bardazano\",\"doi\":\"10.22187/RFD2019N47A13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article intends to account for the importance of internal point of view to understand the concept of law, having into account Raz’s distancing regarding Hart on this issue, to whom he concedes conceptual primacy. In this sense, for the legal systems’ conceptual analysis, the epistemic privilege conferred to internal point of view articulates with the conception of rules as exclusive reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2019N47A13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2019N47A13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在说明内部观点对理解法律概念的重要性,同时考虑到拉兹在这个问题上对哈特的疏远,他承认哈特在概念上是首要的。从这个意义上说,对于法律体系的概念分析来说,赋予内部观点的认识特权与规则作为排他性原因的概念相契合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El punto de vista interno y las razones para la acción
The article intends to account for the importance of internal point of view to understand the concept of law, having into account Raz’s distancing regarding Hart on this issue, to whom he concedes conceptual primacy. In this sense, for the legal systems’ conceptual analysis, the epistemic privilege conferred to internal point of view articulates with the conception of rules as exclusive reasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Acceso de la Administración Tributaria a la Información Bancaria en Honduras Estudio de la Figura del Holding, su desarrollo en Latinoamérica y presencia en Honduras Reflexiones en torno a la Proporcionalidad y Ponderación de Derechos Aplicados al Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación In Vitro) Vs. Costa Rica Derechos Humanos: Coercibilidad de tratados, Educación, Estado de Derecho y Democracia RETROACTIVIDAD DE LA LEY PENAL MAS FAVORABLE (En Honduras una cuestión de justicia constitucional)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1