1型糖尿病远程医疗成功实施的制度障碍

Q2 Medicine Clinical Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.2337/cd23-0056
Joyce M Lee, Emma Ospelt, Nudrat Noor, Ann Mungmode, Osagie Ebekozien, Meenal Gupta, Faisal S Malik, Naomi R Fogel, Siham Accacha, Susan Hsieh, Meredith Wilkes, Anna Neyman, Francesco Vendrame
{"title":"1型糖尿病远程医疗成功实施的制度障碍","authors":"Joyce M Lee, Emma Ospelt, Nudrat Noor, Ann Mungmode, Osagie Ebekozien, Meenal Gupta, Faisal S Malik, Naomi R Fogel, Siham Accacha, Susan Hsieh, Meredith Wilkes, Anna Neyman, Francesco Vendrame","doi":"10.2337/cd23-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to describe rates of telemedicine use 18 months after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and to assess the institutional barriers to its implementation for type 1 diabetes care across centers of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. Observational electronic health record data capturing telemedicine rates from 15 U.S. centers between September 2020 and September 2021 and a survey of 33 centers capturing telemedicine rates and key components of telemedicine were analyzed. A capacity score was developed and summed to a total capacity score and compared with overall telemedicine rates across centers. Telemedicine visits decreased by 17.4% from September 2020 to September 2021. Generally, it was observed that the lower the average telemedicine capacity score, the lower the rate of telemedicine visits. Despite a decline in the utilization of telemedicine 18 months after the start of the pandemic, visit rates were still 20% higher than in the pre-pandemic period. However, there is a need to improve structural components to ensure telemedicine capacity and robust telemedicine utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":39894,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diabetes","volume":" ","pages":"34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Barriers to the Successful Implementation of Telemedicine for Type 1 Diabetes Care.\",\"authors\":\"Joyce M Lee, Emma Ospelt, Nudrat Noor, Ann Mungmode, Osagie Ebekozien, Meenal Gupta, Faisal S Malik, Naomi R Fogel, Siham Accacha, Susan Hsieh, Meredith Wilkes, Anna Neyman, Francesco Vendrame\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/cd23-0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to describe rates of telemedicine use 18 months after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and to assess the institutional barriers to its implementation for type 1 diabetes care across centers of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. Observational electronic health record data capturing telemedicine rates from 15 U.S. centers between September 2020 and September 2021 and a survey of 33 centers capturing telemedicine rates and key components of telemedicine were analyzed. A capacity score was developed and summed to a total capacity score and compared with overall telemedicine rates across centers. Telemedicine visits decreased by 17.4% from September 2020 to September 2021. Generally, it was observed that the lower the average telemedicine capacity score, the lower the rate of telemedicine visits. Despite a decline in the utilization of telemedicine 18 months after the start of the pandemic, visit rates were still 20% higher than in the pre-pandemic period. However, there is a need to improve structural components to ensure telemedicine capacity and robust telemedicine utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述2019年冠状病毒病大流行开始18个月后远程医疗的使用率,并评估T1D交流质量改进协作中心在1型糖尿病护理中实施远程医疗的制度障碍。分析了2020年9月至2021年9月期间捕获美国15个中心远程医疗率的观察性电子健康记录数据,以及对捕获远程医疗率和远程医疗关键组成部分的33个中心的调查。开发了容量得分,并将其汇总为总容量得分,并与各中心的总体远程医疗率进行比较。从2020年9月到2021年9月,远程医疗访问量下降了17.4%。总体而言,平均远程医疗能力得分越低,远程医疗就诊率越低。尽管在大流行开始18个月后,远程医疗的使用率有所下降,但出诊率仍比大流行前时期高出20%。然而,有必要改进结构组件,以确保远程医疗能力和强大的远程医疗利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutional Barriers to the Successful Implementation of Telemedicine for Type 1 Diabetes Care.

The aim of this study was to describe rates of telemedicine use 18 months after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and to assess the institutional barriers to its implementation for type 1 diabetes care across centers of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. Observational electronic health record data capturing telemedicine rates from 15 U.S. centers between September 2020 and September 2021 and a survey of 33 centers capturing telemedicine rates and key components of telemedicine were analyzed. A capacity score was developed and summed to a total capacity score and compared with overall telemedicine rates across centers. Telemedicine visits decreased by 17.4% from September 2020 to September 2021. Generally, it was observed that the lower the average telemedicine capacity score, the lower the rate of telemedicine visits. Despite a decline in the utilization of telemedicine 18 months after the start of the pandemic, visit rates were still 20% higher than in the pre-pandemic period. However, there is a need to improve structural components to ensure telemedicine capacity and robust telemedicine utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Diabetes
Clinical Diabetes Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Diabetes is to provide primary care providers and all clinicians involved in the care of people with diabetes with information on advances and state-of-the-art care for people with diabetes. Clinical Diabetes is also a forum for discussing diabetes-related problems in practice, medical-legal issues, case studies, digests of recent research, and patient education materials.
期刊最新文献
Good To Know: Your Type 2 Diabetes Treatment: Get Ready for Your Visit. Therapeutic Inertia: Still a Big Problem. Increasing Access to Connected Insulin Pens by Promoting Shared Decision-Making Through Collaborative Quality Improvement. Increasing Awareness and Uptake of Connected Insulin Pens for Eligible Patients With Diabetes: A Quality Improvement Success Story. Partnering With Families Through Shared Decision-Making to Increase Connected Pen Use: A Quality Improvement Success Story.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1