探索物理科学学习者对反应图的速率和程度的图示解释

Taurayi Willard Chinaka, Zanele Qwabe
{"title":"探索物理科学学习者对反应图的速率和程度的图示解释","authors":"Taurayi Willard Chinaka, Zanele Qwabe","doi":"10.18844/cjes.v18i1.7002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graphs are very important in all areas of science, and they are an essential part of tertiary, high school, and primary school learning, worldwide. A solid understanding of graphical interpretation is essential for understanding today's world and becoming scientifically literate. The aim of this study was to explore grade 12 learners’ graphical interpretation of the rate and extent of reaction topic. A mixed-method methodology was adopted for this study. A purposive sampling technique was used to sample participants from the accessible population in King Cetshwayo District KwaZulu-Natal province in South Africa. One-hundred and forty-six (146) grade 12 Physical Sciences learners formed the sample. A validated two-tier diagnostic questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 25 and inductive coding was used to qualitative data. The Johnstone triangle and the Peircean semiotic modes were employed as the theoretical framework. The findings indicated that learners rely on definitions to interpret graphs. Most of the learners failed to interpret the salient features of the graphs. The findings of this study are diagnostic, and they assist module designers and educators in determining challenges learners face when interpreting graphs in chemistry. Implications for instructional approaches particular to the rate of reaction graphs are discussed. Further studies are needed on instructional practices and their effect on students’ ability to interpret rate and extent of reaction graphs.\nKeywords: Graphical interpretation; rate and extent of reaction; Johnstone triangle","PeriodicalId":37121,"journal":{"name":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring physical sciences learners’ graphical interpretation of rate and extent of reaction graphs\",\"authors\":\"Taurayi Willard Chinaka, Zanele Qwabe\",\"doi\":\"10.18844/cjes.v18i1.7002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Graphs are very important in all areas of science, and they are an essential part of tertiary, high school, and primary school learning, worldwide. A solid understanding of graphical interpretation is essential for understanding today's world and becoming scientifically literate. The aim of this study was to explore grade 12 learners’ graphical interpretation of the rate and extent of reaction topic. A mixed-method methodology was adopted for this study. A purposive sampling technique was used to sample participants from the accessible population in King Cetshwayo District KwaZulu-Natal province in South Africa. One-hundred and forty-six (146) grade 12 Physical Sciences learners formed the sample. A validated two-tier diagnostic questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 25 and inductive coding was used to qualitative data. The Johnstone triangle and the Peircean semiotic modes were employed as the theoretical framework. The findings indicated that learners rely on definitions to interpret graphs. Most of the learners failed to interpret the salient features of the graphs. The findings of this study are diagnostic, and they assist module designers and educators in determining challenges learners face when interpreting graphs in chemistry. Implications for instructional approaches particular to the rate of reaction graphs are discussed. Further studies are needed on instructional practices and their effect on students’ ability to interpret rate and extent of reaction graphs.\\nKeywords: Graphical interpretation; rate and extent of reaction; Johnstone triangle\",\"PeriodicalId\":37121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v18i1.7002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v18i1.7002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图表在所有科学领域都非常重要,它们是世界范围内大学、高中和小学学习的重要组成部分。对图形解释的深刻理解对于理解当今世界和成为科学素养至关重要。摘要本研究旨在探讨高三学生对反应话题的速度和程度的图示解释。本研究采用混合方法。采用有目的抽样技术对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省塞奇瓦约国王区无障碍人口中的参与者进行抽样。146名12年级物理科学学生组成了样本。采用有效的两层诊断问卷和半结构化访谈收集数据。定量资料采用SPSS 25进行分析,定性资料采用归纳编码。约翰斯通三角和佩尔海符号学模式被作为理论框架。研究结果表明,学习者依赖定义来解释图形。大多数学习者都不能解释图表的显著特征。本研究的发现是诊断性的,它们帮助模块设计者和教育者确定学习者在解释化学图表时面临的挑战。讨论了对教学方法的启示,特别是对反应速率图的启示。教学实践及其对学生解读反应图的比率和程度的影响有待进一步研究。关键词:图形解译;反应速率和程度;约翰斯通三角形
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring physical sciences learners’ graphical interpretation of rate and extent of reaction graphs
Graphs are very important in all areas of science, and they are an essential part of tertiary, high school, and primary school learning, worldwide. A solid understanding of graphical interpretation is essential for understanding today's world and becoming scientifically literate. The aim of this study was to explore grade 12 learners’ graphical interpretation of the rate and extent of reaction topic. A mixed-method methodology was adopted for this study. A purposive sampling technique was used to sample participants from the accessible population in King Cetshwayo District KwaZulu-Natal province in South Africa. One-hundred and forty-six (146) grade 12 Physical Sciences learners formed the sample. A validated two-tier diagnostic questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 25 and inductive coding was used to qualitative data. The Johnstone triangle and the Peircean semiotic modes were employed as the theoretical framework. The findings indicated that learners rely on definitions to interpret graphs. Most of the learners failed to interpret the salient features of the graphs. The findings of this study are diagnostic, and they assist module designers and educators in determining challenges learners face when interpreting graphs in chemistry. Implications for instructional approaches particular to the rate of reaction graphs are discussed. Further studies are needed on instructional practices and their effect on students’ ability to interpret rate and extent of reaction graphs. Keywords: Graphical interpretation; rate and extent of reaction; Johnstone triangle
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of preschool teachers' chess learning and teaching experiences Intrinsic motivation in preschool children: Predictive effect on levels of resilience Utilizing prior language knowledge: A study of how Thai students translate unknown languages into English The effectiveness of the psychoeducation program developed to increase school attachment Manifestations of students' "clip thinking" in working with a scientific text
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1