Whatsapp状态中的仇恨言论

Yuni Suryani, Rika Istianingrum, Idhoofiyatul Fatin
{"title":"Whatsapp状态中的仇恨言论","authors":"Yuni Suryani, Rika Istianingrum, Idhoofiyatul Fatin","doi":"10.26499/surbet.v17i1.330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hate Speech Act in Whatsapp StatusHate speech acts on social media often become criminal law complaints offenses with the aim of obtaining justice. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method that aims to describe hate speech acts on Whatsapp status. The research data comes from the screenshot of the Whatsapp status obtained by the researcher from BAP (News of the Judiciary), the researcher as a linguist witness. The data presented in the BAP according to the chronology or context of the event were analyzed using Searle's speech acts. Based on the analysis, the writer found several kinds of hate speech acts, namely (1) insulting expressive and warning directives; (2) derogatory expressive and directive (giving warning); (3) expressive accusing and assertive (giving statements); (4) assertive accusing, assertive inciting, expressive insulting, and threatening commissive; (5) commissive, challenging, and expressive insulting; (6) expressive contempt and assertive accusing; (7) derogatory expressiveness; (8) assertive accusing, expressive insulting; (9) commissive threats; (10) expressive insulting, assertive admitting, and assertive accusing.AbstrakTindak tutur kebencian dalam media sosial sering menjadi delik aduan hukum pidana dengan tujuan memperoleh keadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dan bertujuan mendeskripsikan tindak tutur kebencian dalam status Whatsapp. Data penelitian berasal dari tangkapan layar status Whatsapp yang diperoleh peneliti dari BAP (Berita Acara Peradilan) peneliti sebagai ahli bahasa. Data yang disajikan dalam BAP sesuai dengan kronologi atau konteks peristiwa dan dianalisis menggunakan teori tindak tutur Searle (1975). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada beberapa tindak tutur kebencian, yaitu (1) ekspresif menghina dan direktif memberi peringatan; (2) ekspresif menghina dan direktif (memberi peringatan); (3) ekspresif menuduh dan asertif (memberikan pernyataan); (4) asertif menuduh, asertif menghasut, ekspresif menghina, dan komisif mengancam; (5) komisif, menantang, dan ekspresif menghina; (6) ekspresif menghina dan asertif menuduh; (7) ekspresif menghina; (8) asertif menuduh, ekspresif menghina; (9) komisif mengancam; (10) ekspresif menghina, asertif mengakui, dan asertif menuduh. ","PeriodicalId":34821,"journal":{"name":"Suar Betang","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tindak Tutur Kebencian dalam Status Whatsapp\",\"authors\":\"Yuni Suryani, Rika Istianingrum, Idhoofiyatul Fatin\",\"doi\":\"10.26499/surbet.v17i1.330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hate Speech Act in Whatsapp StatusHate speech acts on social media often become criminal law complaints offenses with the aim of obtaining justice. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method that aims to describe hate speech acts on Whatsapp status. The research data comes from the screenshot of the Whatsapp status obtained by the researcher from BAP (News of the Judiciary), the researcher as a linguist witness. The data presented in the BAP according to the chronology or context of the event were analyzed using Searle's speech acts. Based on the analysis, the writer found several kinds of hate speech acts, namely (1) insulting expressive and warning directives; (2) derogatory expressive and directive (giving warning); (3) expressive accusing and assertive (giving statements); (4) assertive accusing, assertive inciting, expressive insulting, and threatening commissive; (5) commissive, challenging, and expressive insulting; (6) expressive contempt and assertive accusing; (7) derogatory expressiveness; (8) assertive accusing, expressive insulting; (9) commissive threats; (10) expressive insulting, assertive admitting, and assertive accusing.AbstrakTindak tutur kebencian dalam media sosial sering menjadi delik aduan hukum pidana dengan tujuan memperoleh keadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dan bertujuan mendeskripsikan tindak tutur kebencian dalam status Whatsapp. Data penelitian berasal dari tangkapan layar status Whatsapp yang diperoleh peneliti dari BAP (Berita Acara Peradilan) peneliti sebagai ahli bahasa. Data yang disajikan dalam BAP sesuai dengan kronologi atau konteks peristiwa dan dianalisis menggunakan teori tindak tutur Searle (1975). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada beberapa tindak tutur kebencian, yaitu (1) ekspresif menghina dan direktif memberi peringatan; (2) ekspresif menghina dan direktif (memberi peringatan); (3) ekspresif menuduh dan asertif (memberikan pernyataan); (4) asertif menuduh, asertif menghasut, ekspresif menghina, dan komisif mengancam; (5) komisif, menantang, dan ekspresif menghina; (6) ekspresif menghina dan asertif menuduh; (7) ekspresif menghina; (8) asertif menuduh, ekspresif menghina; (9) komisif mengancam; (10) ekspresif menghina, asertif mengakui, dan asertif menuduh. \",\"PeriodicalId\":34821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suar Betang\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suar Betang\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v17i1.330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suar Betang","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v17i1.330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Whatsapp法规中的仇恨言论法案社交媒体上的仇恨言论行为往往成为刑法投诉犯罪,目的是伸张正义。本研究采用定性描述方法,旨在描述Whatsapp状态下的仇恨言论行为。研究数据来自研究人员从BAP(司法新闻)获得的Whatsapp状态截图,该研究人员是语言学家证人。根据事件的时间顺序或背景,BAP中提供的数据使用Searle的言语行为进行了分析。在分析的基础上,作者发现了几种类型的仇恨言论行为,即(1)侮辱性的表达和警告指令;(2) 贬损的表达和指示(发出警告);(3) 表达指责和自信(陈述);(4) 自信指责、自信煽动、表达侮辱和威胁同情;(5) 同情、挑战和表达侮辱;(6) 表现出的蔑视和武断的指责;(7) 贬损表达;(8) 武断的指责、表达性的侮辱;(9) 同情威胁;(10) 表达性的侮辱、自信的承认和自信的指责。社交媒体上的抽象仇恨言论往往成为一种微妙的刑事指控,以期伸张正义。本研究采用定性描述方法,旨在描述Whatsapp状态下的仇恨言论行为。研究数据来自于捕捉Whatsapp状态屏幕研究人员和BAP研究人员作为语言学家。BAP中根据事件的年表或上下文提供的数据,并使用Searle的言语行为理论(1975)进行分析。研究表明,存在一些仇恨言论行为,即(1)明示侮辱和指令警告;(2) 表达羞辱和指示;(3) 明确指责和自信;(4) 自信的指责、自信的煽动、明确的侮辱和专员的威胁;(5) 委托、质疑和明显羞辱;(6) 明确的侮辱性和武断的指控;(7) 侮辱性的;(8) 被指控的断言,明显带有侮辱性;(9) 威胁委员;(10) 表达侮辱性的、自信的忏悔和自信的指责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tindak Tutur Kebencian dalam Status Whatsapp
Hate Speech Act in Whatsapp StatusHate speech acts on social media often become criminal law complaints offenses with the aim of obtaining justice. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method that aims to describe hate speech acts on Whatsapp status. The research data comes from the screenshot of the Whatsapp status obtained by the researcher from BAP (News of the Judiciary), the researcher as a linguist witness. The data presented in the BAP according to the chronology or context of the event were analyzed using Searle's speech acts. Based on the analysis, the writer found several kinds of hate speech acts, namely (1) insulting expressive and warning directives; (2) derogatory expressive and directive (giving warning); (3) expressive accusing and assertive (giving statements); (4) assertive accusing, assertive inciting, expressive insulting, and threatening commissive; (5) commissive, challenging, and expressive insulting; (6) expressive contempt and assertive accusing; (7) derogatory expressiveness; (8) assertive accusing, expressive insulting; (9) commissive threats; (10) expressive insulting, assertive admitting, and assertive accusing.AbstrakTindak tutur kebencian dalam media sosial sering menjadi delik aduan hukum pidana dengan tujuan memperoleh keadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dan bertujuan mendeskripsikan tindak tutur kebencian dalam status Whatsapp. Data penelitian berasal dari tangkapan layar status Whatsapp yang diperoleh peneliti dari BAP (Berita Acara Peradilan) peneliti sebagai ahli bahasa. Data yang disajikan dalam BAP sesuai dengan kronologi atau konteks peristiwa dan dianalisis menggunakan teori tindak tutur Searle (1975). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada beberapa tindak tutur kebencian, yaitu (1) ekspresif menghina dan direktif memberi peringatan; (2) ekspresif menghina dan direktif (memberi peringatan); (3) ekspresif menuduh dan asertif (memberikan pernyataan); (4) asertif menuduh, asertif menghasut, ekspresif menghina, dan komisif mengancam; (5) komisif, menantang, dan ekspresif menghina; (6) ekspresif menghina dan asertif menuduh; (7) ekspresif menghina; (8) asertif menuduh, ekspresif menghina; (9) komisif mengancam; (10) ekspresif menghina, asertif mengakui, dan asertif menuduh. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Javanese Mystique, Modernity, and Islamism: Radical Subjects in the Works of Iman Budhi Santosa Erotism and the Translation of the Poetry "Di Antara Kita" by Ajip Rosidi and "Nyanyian Duniawi" by W.S. Rendra Dissociative Effect and Reorientation of Consciousness in the Movie Yuni and He Named Me Malala The Changes in Ideology in the Adaptation of Riordan’s The Lightning Thief Blue Economy and Green Economy: Ecocritical Study of Kompas Short Stories Collection Keluarga Kudus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1