Ronald Cheung, Samantha So, Monali S. Malvankar-Mehta
{"title":"机器学习分类器对白内障的诊断准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Ronald Cheung, Samantha So, Monali S. Malvankar-Mehta","doi":"10.1080/17469899.2022.2142120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy of current machine learning classifiers for pediatric and adult cataracts. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were searched systematically and thoroughly. Conferences held through Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, and Canadian Society of Ophthalmology were searched. Studies were screened using Covidence software and data on sensitivity, specificity and area under curve were extracted from the included studies. STATA 15.0 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results Our search strategy identified 150 records from databases and 35 records from gray literature. Total of 21 records were used for the qualitative analysis and 11 records (100 134 images) were used for the quantitative analysis. In adult patients with cataracts, the pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.948 [95% CI: 0.815–0.987] and specificity was 0.960 [95% CI: 0.924–0.980] for cataract screening using machine learning classifiers. For pediatric cataracts, the pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.882 [95% CI: 0.696–0.960] and specificity was 0.891 [95% CI: 0.807–0.942]. Conclusion The included studies show promising results for the diagnostic accuracy of the machine learning classifiers for cataracts and its potential implementation in clinical settings. Prospero registration CRD42020219316","PeriodicalId":39989,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","volume":"17 1","pages":"427 - 437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers for cataracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Cheung, Samantha So, Monali S. Malvankar-Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17469899.2022.2142120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy of current machine learning classifiers for pediatric and adult cataracts. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were searched systematically and thoroughly. Conferences held through Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, and Canadian Society of Ophthalmology were searched. Studies were screened using Covidence software and data on sensitivity, specificity and area under curve were extracted from the included studies. STATA 15.0 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results Our search strategy identified 150 records from databases and 35 records from gray literature. Total of 21 records were used for the qualitative analysis and 11 records (100 134 images) were used for the quantitative analysis. In adult patients with cataracts, the pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.948 [95% CI: 0.815–0.987] and specificity was 0.960 [95% CI: 0.924–0.980] for cataract screening using machine learning classifiers. For pediatric cataracts, the pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.882 [95% CI: 0.696–0.960] and specificity was 0.891 [95% CI: 0.807–0.942]. Conclusion The included studies show promising results for the diagnostic accuracy of the machine learning classifiers for cataracts and its potential implementation in clinical settings. Prospero registration CRD42020219316\",\"PeriodicalId\":39989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"427 - 437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2142120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2142120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers for cataracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy of current machine learning classifiers for pediatric and adult cataracts. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were searched systematically and thoroughly. Conferences held through Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, and Canadian Society of Ophthalmology were searched. Studies were screened using Covidence software and data on sensitivity, specificity and area under curve were extracted from the included studies. STATA 15.0 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results Our search strategy identified 150 records from databases and 35 records from gray literature. Total of 21 records were used for the qualitative analysis and 11 records (100 134 images) were used for the quantitative analysis. In adult patients with cataracts, the pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.948 [95% CI: 0.815–0.987] and specificity was 0.960 [95% CI: 0.924–0.980] for cataract screening using machine learning classifiers. For pediatric cataracts, the pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.882 [95% CI: 0.696–0.960] and specificity was 0.891 [95% CI: 0.807–0.942]. Conclusion The included studies show promising results for the diagnostic accuracy of the machine learning classifiers for cataracts and its potential implementation in clinical settings. Prospero registration CRD42020219316
期刊介绍:
The worldwide problem of visual impairment is set to increase, as we are seeing increased longevity in developed countries. This will produce a crisis in vision care unless concerted action is taken. The substantial value that ophthalmic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases has led to intense research efforts in this area in recent years, with corresponding improvements in treatment, ophthalmic instrumentation and surgical techniques. As a result, the future for ophthalmology holds great promise as further exciting and innovative developments unfold.