消费者对生物强化作物的评价:来自实验室实验的证据

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1111/agec.12795
Syed Imran Ali Meerza, Khondoker Mottaleb, Alwin Dsouza, Md. Shajedur Rahaman, Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar
{"title":"消费者对生物强化作物的评价:来自实验室实验的证据","authors":"Syed Imran Ali Meerza,&nbsp;Khondoker Mottaleb,&nbsp;Alwin Dsouza,&nbsp;Md. Shajedur Rahaman,&nbsp;Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar","doi":"10.1111/agec.12795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Malnutrition among women of reproductive age and children remains one of the major issues in developing countries, particularly zinc deficiency. Zinc deficiency hinders cognitive and physical development in children as well as adults. This study utilized a non-hypothetical laboratory valuation experiment to analyze whether positive information about biofortified rice affects consumers’ valuations of biofortified as well as non-biofortified rice. Specifically, we designed a within-subject experiment based on Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) auction mechanism to compare consumers’ valuations of zinc-biofortified and popular non-biofortified rice varieties before and after exposure to information about the health benefits of zinc-biofortified rice. We conducted our experiments in randomly selected four districts of Bangladesh, and a total of 134 consumers participated in our study. Results reveal that consumers assign a significant premium to zinc-biofortified rice when they receive information about zinc-biofortified rice and its health benefits. Intriguingly, positive information about zinc-biofortified rice negatively affects the valuation of non-biofortified rice varieties, suggesting negative spillover effects. Moreover, our results also identify that both the information provision and labeling are important to increase consumer demand for zinc-biofortified rice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"54 5","pages":"697-708"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers’ valuation of a biofortified crop: Evidence from a laboratory experiment\",\"authors\":\"Syed Imran Ali Meerza,&nbsp;Khondoker Mottaleb,&nbsp;Alwin Dsouza,&nbsp;Md. Shajedur Rahaman,&nbsp;Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/agec.12795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Malnutrition among women of reproductive age and children remains one of the major issues in developing countries, particularly zinc deficiency. Zinc deficiency hinders cognitive and physical development in children as well as adults. This study utilized a non-hypothetical laboratory valuation experiment to analyze whether positive information about biofortified rice affects consumers’ valuations of biofortified as well as non-biofortified rice. Specifically, we designed a within-subject experiment based on Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) auction mechanism to compare consumers’ valuations of zinc-biofortified and popular non-biofortified rice varieties before and after exposure to information about the health benefits of zinc-biofortified rice. We conducted our experiments in randomly selected four districts of Bangladesh, and a total of 134 consumers participated in our study. Results reveal that consumers assign a significant premium to zinc-biofortified rice when they receive information about zinc-biofortified rice and its health benefits. Intriguingly, positive information about zinc-biofortified rice negatively affects the valuation of non-biofortified rice varieties, suggesting negative spillover effects. Moreover, our results also identify that both the information provision and labeling are important to increase consumer demand for zinc-biofortified rice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"697-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12795\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

育龄妇女和儿童营养不良仍然是发展中国家的主要问题之一,尤其是缺锌。锌缺乏阻碍儿童和成人的认知和身体发育。这项研究利用了一个非假设的实验室评估实验来分析有关生物强化大米的积极信息是否会影响消费者对生物强化和非生物强化水稻的评估。具体而言,我们设计了一个基于Becker‐DeGroot‐Marschak(BDM)拍卖机制的受试者内部实验,以比较消费者在接触锌生物强化大米的健康益处信息前后对锌生物强化和流行的非生物强化大米品种的估价。我们在孟加拉国随机选择的四个地区进行了实验,共有134名消费者参与了我们的研究。结果表明,当消费者收到有关锌生物强化大米及其健康益处的信息时,他们会对锌生物强化米饭给予显著的溢价。有趣的是,关于锌生物强化水稻的积极信息对非生物强化水稻品种的估值产生了负面影响,表明存在负面溢出效应。此外,我们的研究结果还表明,信息提供和标签对增加消费者对锌生物强化大米的需求都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumers’ valuation of a biofortified crop: Evidence from a laboratory experiment

Malnutrition among women of reproductive age and children remains one of the major issues in developing countries, particularly zinc deficiency. Zinc deficiency hinders cognitive and physical development in children as well as adults. This study utilized a non-hypothetical laboratory valuation experiment to analyze whether positive information about biofortified rice affects consumers’ valuations of biofortified as well as non-biofortified rice. Specifically, we designed a within-subject experiment based on Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) auction mechanism to compare consumers’ valuations of zinc-biofortified and popular non-biofortified rice varieties before and after exposure to information about the health benefits of zinc-biofortified rice. We conducted our experiments in randomly selected four districts of Bangladesh, and a total of 134 consumers participated in our study. Results reveal that consumers assign a significant premium to zinc-biofortified rice when they receive information about zinc-biofortified rice and its health benefits. Intriguingly, positive information about zinc-biofortified rice negatively affects the valuation of non-biofortified rice varieties, suggesting negative spillover effects. Moreover, our results also identify that both the information provision and labeling are important to increase consumer demand for zinc-biofortified rice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Livelihood diversification and household welfare among farm households in the Philippines Growing importance of price: Investigating food values before and during high inflation in Germany An experimental approach to farmer valuation of African rice genetic resources Designated market makers and agricultural futures market quality: Evidence from China's Dalian commodity exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1