术前应用三丙烯酸酯明胶微球与线圈栓塞门静脉的比较研究

Lei Yuan, Yingjun Wu, Yun X. Xu, Kaijian Chu, F. Feng, Xiaobing Wu, B. Yi, Yefa Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang
{"title":"术前应用三丙烯酸酯明胶微球与线圈栓塞门静脉的比较研究","authors":"Lei Yuan, Yingjun Wu, Yun X. Xu, Kaijian Chu, F. Feng, Xiaobing Wu, B. Yi, Yefa Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nEight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P 0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05]. \n \n \nConclusions \nThis study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils. \n \n \nKey words: \nLiver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy","PeriodicalId":10021,"journal":{"name":"中华肝胆外科杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"208-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on preoperative portal vein embolization using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus coils\",\"authors\":\"Lei Yuan, Yingjun Wu, Yun X. Xu, Kaijian Chu, F. Feng, Xiaobing Wu, B. Yi, Yefa Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nEight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P 0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05]. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThis study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nLiver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy\",\"PeriodicalId\":10021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"208-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝胆外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较术前使用三丙烯明胶微球(TAGM)与线圈栓塞门静脉(PVE)的效果。方法2016年3月至2018年6月,东方肝胆外科医院胆道外科一科连续21例因恶性或良性肝病计划大肝切除术前未来肝残(FLR)率小于45%的患者纳入研究。患者分为两组,分别采用远端TAGM +近端线圈门静脉栓塞术(TC组)和多线圈门静脉栓塞术(CC组)。pve术后并发症、肝功能、血常规检查;比较两组患者FLR增生情况、肝切除类型、手术时间、术中出血量及术后并发症。结果8例患者纳入TC组。男4例,女4例,平均年龄(55.3±7.7)岁。CC组13例患者,男性11例,女性2例,平均年龄(52.6±11.3)岁。两组患者在性别、年龄、肝病类型、FLR体积、FLR比率、标准FLR比率、手术类型、手术时间、出血量、主要并发症、肝功能衰竭发生率等方面均无显著差异。两组患者均成功进行PVE治疗。TC组FLR体积有效增长,1例患者因肿瘤进展而未能接受手术。CC组4例肝切除失败:1例门静脉左支主干血栓形成;1例患者发生肿瘤进展,2例患者FLR生长不足。与CC组相比,TC组FLR增生体积显著增加[(9.0±2.8)%比(5.2±3.8)%,P 0.05],增殖百分比显著增加[(33.6±20.1)%比(20.9±15.1)%,P 0.05]。结论TAGM +线圈的PVE是安全有效的。与使用多个线圈的PVE相比,它诱导的FLR肥大程度更好。关键词:肝脏疾病;门静脉栓塞;三丙烯明胶微球;线圈;主要肝切除术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study on preoperative portal vein embolization using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus coils
Objective To compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils. Methods From March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results Eight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P 0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05]. Conclusions This study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils. Key words: Liver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华肝胆外科杂志
中华肝胆外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7101
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association and supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, founded in 1995. The journal has the following columns: review, hot spotlight, academic thinking, thesis, experimental research, short thesis, case report, synthesis, etc. The journal has been recognized by Beida Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences). Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery has been included in famous databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of China Science Citation Database (with Extended Version) and so on, and it is one of the national key academic journals under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic efficacy of external and internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice Combined postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis Retrograde approach to the retroperitoneal Castleman disease: a case report and literature review Application of laparoscopy in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer Hepatic biloma after minimally invasive interventional therapies: treatment and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1