Lei Yuan, Yingjun Wu, Yun X. Xu, Kaijian Chu, F. Feng, Xiaobing Wu, B. Yi, Yefa Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang
{"title":"术前应用三丙烯酸酯明胶微球与线圈栓塞门静脉的比较研究","authors":"Lei Yuan, Yingjun Wu, Yun X. Xu, Kaijian Chu, F. Feng, Xiaobing Wu, B. Yi, Yefa Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nEight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P 0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05]. \n \n \nConclusions \nThis study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils. \n \n \nKey words: \nLiver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy","PeriodicalId":10021,"journal":{"name":"中华肝胆外科杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"208-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on preoperative portal vein embolization using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus coils\",\"authors\":\"Lei Yuan, Yingjun Wu, Yun X. Xu, Kaijian Chu, F. Feng, Xiaobing Wu, B. Yi, Yefa Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nEight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P 0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05]. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThis study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nLiver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy\",\"PeriodicalId\":10021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"208-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝胆外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study on preoperative portal vein embolization using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus coils
Objective
To compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils.
Methods
From March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
Results
Eight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P 0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05].
Conclusions
This study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils.
Key words:
Liver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association and supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, founded in 1995. The journal has the following columns: review, hot spotlight, academic thinking, thesis, experimental research, short thesis, case report, synthesis, etc. The journal has been recognized by Beida Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences).
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery has been included in famous databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of China Science Citation Database (with Extended Version) and so on, and it is one of the national key academic journals under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology.