充分性和可持续性:可持续组织的概念分析和道德考虑

IF 2.2 2区 哲学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Values Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.3197/096327121X16328186623878
T. Lehtonen, Pasi Heikkurinen
{"title":"充分性和可持续性:可持续组织的概念分析和道德考虑","authors":"T. Lehtonen, Pasi Heikkurinen","doi":"10.3197/096327121X16328186623878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the concept of sufficiency in relation to sustainability and discusses ethical implications for sustainable organisation in time and place. We identify three foundational conceptualisations of sufficiency related to sustainability: (1) a limits model that starts with objective boundaries imposed by the biosphere and basic human needs; (2) a preference model that treats sufficiency as a subjective inclination for moderation defined situationally; and (3) a balancing model that seeks to integrate the objective limits and subjective preferences by focussing on action embedded in the socio-ecological context. This includes balancing the needs of humans with those of non-humans. The limits model builds on universal duty, the preference model on preference utilitarianism and the balancing model on action-oriented virtue ethics. The balancing model of sufficiency is well suited to meeting the needs of present and future generations as well as delivering intra- and inter-generational justice not limited to humans.","PeriodicalId":47200,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Values","volume":"31 1","pages":"599 - 618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sufficiency and Sustainability: Conceptual Analysis and Ethical Considerations for Sustainable Organisation\",\"authors\":\"T. Lehtonen, Pasi Heikkurinen\",\"doi\":\"10.3197/096327121X16328186623878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the concept of sufficiency in relation to sustainability and discusses ethical implications for sustainable organisation in time and place. We identify three foundational conceptualisations of sufficiency related to sustainability: (1) a limits model that starts with objective boundaries imposed by the biosphere and basic human needs; (2) a preference model that treats sufficiency as a subjective inclination for moderation defined situationally; and (3) a balancing model that seeks to integrate the objective limits and subjective preferences by focussing on action embedded in the socio-ecological context. This includes balancing the needs of humans with those of non-humans. The limits model builds on universal duty, the preference model on preference utilitarianism and the balancing model on action-oriented virtue ethics. The balancing model of sufficiency is well suited to meeting the needs of present and future generations as well as delivering intra- and inter-generational justice not limited to humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Values\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"599 - 618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16328186623878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Values","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16328186623878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文分析了充分性与可持续性的关系,并讨论了可持续组织在时间和地点上的伦理意义。我们确定了与可持续性相关的充足性的三个基本概念:(1)从生物圈和人类基本需求强加的客观边界开始的极限模型;(2) 偏好模型,将充分性视为情境定义的适度的主观倾向;以及(3)一个平衡模型,通过关注嵌入社会生态环境中的行动,寻求整合客观限制和主观偏好。这包括平衡人类和非人类的需求。极限模型建立在普遍义务之上,偏好模型建立在偏好功利主义之上,平衡模型建立在行动导向的美德伦理之上。充足性的平衡模式非常适合满足今世后代的需求,并提供不限于人类的代际正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sufficiency and Sustainability: Conceptual Analysis and Ethical Considerations for Sustainable Organisation
This article analyses the concept of sufficiency in relation to sustainability and discusses ethical implications for sustainable organisation in time and place. We identify three foundational conceptualisations of sufficiency related to sustainability: (1) a limits model that starts with objective boundaries imposed by the biosphere and basic human needs; (2) a preference model that treats sufficiency as a subjective inclination for moderation defined situationally; and (3) a balancing model that seeks to integrate the objective limits and subjective preferences by focussing on action embedded in the socio-ecological context. This includes balancing the needs of humans with those of non-humans. The limits model builds on universal duty, the preference model on preference utilitarianism and the balancing model on action-oriented virtue ethics. The balancing model of sufficiency is well suited to meeting the needs of present and future generations as well as delivering intra- and inter-generational justice not limited to humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
36.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Environmental Values is an international peer-reviewed journal that brings together contributions from philosophy, economics, politics, sociology, geography, anthropology, ecology and other disciplines, which relate to the present and future environment of human beings and other species. In doing so we aim to clarify the relationship between practical policy issues and more fundamental underlying principles or assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Every tree fixed with a purpose: Contesting value in Olmsted's parks On degrowth strategy: The Simpler Way perspective A social and ethical game-changer? An empirical ethics study of CRISPR in the salmon farming industry Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies Book Review: Strange Natures. Conservation in the Era of Synthetic Biology by Kent H. Redford and William M. Adams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1