借贷体验和借款人信用如何影响对等小额贷款平台市场的理性羊群行为

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Management Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/07421222.2023.2229128
P. Lowry, Junji Xiao, Jia Yuan
{"title":"借贷体验和借款人信用如何影响对等小额贷款平台市场的理性羊群行为","authors":"P. Lowry, Junji Xiao, Jia Yuan","doi":"10.1080/07421222.2023.2229128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the herding behavior that characterizes lenders’ lending decisions on a microloan platform and explains how rational herding behavior can resolve the information-asymmetry problem, which is a well-known reason for the failure of online microloan platforms. Using a set of panel data on individual lending decisions acquired from Paipaidai.com (PPDai), an online microloan platform, we examine the influence of the lending decisions of prominent, experienced lenders on novice lenders to identify rational herding behavior. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that rational herding behavior can in fact efficiently reduce lender loss from borrower defaults caused by limited information. Although it is typically assumed that herding behavior is irrational, we find that it can be rational in this context and can thus shed light on why PPDai has succeeded while most other microloan platforms have failed. Accordingly, we make three key contributions: 1) we use heterogeneous herding effects to empirically determine whether lenders’ herding behavior on PPDai is rational based on observational learning; 2) we investigate the moderating effect of borrower credit and novice-lender experience on herding, and we leverage this heterogeneity in lender experience to better explain loan results; and 3) because PPDai publicly provides potential lenders with a transparent credit score—in contrast to platforms like Prosper.com, which leverage hidden proprietary credit information from Experian—we further analyze the credit composition of prominent lenders to better understand the crucial determinants of rational herding. In fact, our follow-up survival simulations indicate that without rational herding, the total number of successful PPDai loans would have decreased by around 46 percent during the study period—a finding that further underlines the crucial influence of rational herding and the unique contextual factors of PPDai that have fostered it.","PeriodicalId":50154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"40 1","pages":"914 - 952"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Lending Experience and Borrower Credit Influence Rational Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Microloan Platform Markets\",\"authors\":\"P. Lowry, Junji Xiao, Jia Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07421222.2023.2229128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the herding behavior that characterizes lenders’ lending decisions on a microloan platform and explains how rational herding behavior can resolve the information-asymmetry problem, which is a well-known reason for the failure of online microloan platforms. Using a set of panel data on individual lending decisions acquired from Paipaidai.com (PPDai), an online microloan platform, we examine the influence of the lending decisions of prominent, experienced lenders on novice lenders to identify rational herding behavior. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that rational herding behavior can in fact efficiently reduce lender loss from borrower defaults caused by limited information. Although it is typically assumed that herding behavior is irrational, we find that it can be rational in this context and can thus shed light on why PPDai has succeeded while most other microloan platforms have failed. Accordingly, we make three key contributions: 1) we use heterogeneous herding effects to empirically determine whether lenders’ herding behavior on PPDai is rational based on observational learning; 2) we investigate the moderating effect of borrower credit and novice-lender experience on herding, and we leverage this heterogeneity in lender experience to better explain loan results; and 3) because PPDai publicly provides potential lenders with a transparent credit score—in contrast to platforms like Prosper.com, which leverage hidden proprietary credit information from Experian—we further analyze the credit composition of prominent lenders to better understand the crucial determinants of rational herding. In fact, our follow-up survival simulations indicate that without rational herding, the total number of successful PPDai loans would have decreased by around 46 percent during the study period—a finding that further underlines the crucial influence of rational herding and the unique contextual factors of PPDai that have fostered it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"914 - 952\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2229128\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2229128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了小额贷款平台上出借人借贷决策的羊群行为特征,并解释了理性羊群行为如何解决信息不对称问题,这是网络小额贷款平台失败的一个众所周知的原因。利用在线小额贷款平台拍拍贷(拍拍贷)的一组个人贷款决策的面板数据,我们研究了知名的、经验丰富的贷款人对新手贷款人的贷款决策的影响,以确定理性羊群行为。实证分析表明,理性羊群行为实际上可以有效地减少因信息有限而导致的借款人违约给贷款人带来的损失。尽管人们通常认为羊群行为是非理性的,但我们发现,在这种情况下,羊群行为可能是理性的,因此可以解释为什么拍拍贷成功了,而大多数其他小额贷款平台都失败了。因此,我们做出了三个关键贡献:1)基于观察学习,我们利用异质羊群效应实证地确定了借贷人在拍拍贷上的羊群行为是否理性;2)我们研究了借款人信用和新手贷款人经验对羊群效应的调节作用,并利用贷款人经验的这种异质性来更好地解释贷款结果;3)因为拍拍贷公开向潜在的贷款人提供透明的信用评分——与Prosper.com等平台相反,后者利用了experier隐藏的专有信用信息——我们进一步分析了知名贷款人的信用构成,以更好地理解理性羊群的关键决定因素。事实上,我们的后续生存模拟表明,在研究期间,如果没有理性羊群,成功的拍拍贷贷款总数将减少约46%——这一发现进一步强调了理性羊群的关键影响,以及培育它的拍拍贷独特的背景因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Lending Experience and Borrower Credit Influence Rational Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Microloan Platform Markets
ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the herding behavior that characterizes lenders’ lending decisions on a microloan platform and explains how rational herding behavior can resolve the information-asymmetry problem, which is a well-known reason for the failure of online microloan platforms. Using a set of panel data on individual lending decisions acquired from Paipaidai.com (PPDai), an online microloan platform, we examine the influence of the lending decisions of prominent, experienced lenders on novice lenders to identify rational herding behavior. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that rational herding behavior can in fact efficiently reduce lender loss from borrower defaults caused by limited information. Although it is typically assumed that herding behavior is irrational, we find that it can be rational in this context and can thus shed light on why PPDai has succeeded while most other microloan platforms have failed. Accordingly, we make three key contributions: 1) we use heterogeneous herding effects to empirically determine whether lenders’ herding behavior on PPDai is rational based on observational learning; 2) we investigate the moderating effect of borrower credit and novice-lender experience on herding, and we leverage this heterogeneity in lender experience to better explain loan results; and 3) because PPDai publicly provides potential lenders with a transparent credit score—in contrast to platforms like Prosper.com, which leverage hidden proprietary credit information from Experian—we further analyze the credit composition of prominent lenders to better understand the crucial determinants of rational herding. In fact, our follow-up survival simulations indicate that without rational herding, the total number of successful PPDai loans would have decreased by around 46 percent during the study period—a finding that further underlines the crucial influence of rational herding and the unique contextual factors of PPDai that have fostered it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Management Information Systems
Journal of Management Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Management Information Systems is a widely recognized forum for the presentation of research that advances the practice and understanding of organizational information systems. It serves those investigating new modes of information delivery and the changing landscape of information policy making, as well as practitioners and executives managing the information resource.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Vulnerability Prioritization in Cloud Computing Using Multi-View Representation Learning Creating and Capturing Value with Physical-Digital Experiential Consumer Offerings Unintended Consequences of Disclosing Recommendations by Artificial Intelligence versus Humans on True and Fake News Believability and Engagement Board Interlocks with Information Technology Firms and Innovation Outcomes: A Resource Dependence Perspective Engagement and Crowding-Out Effects of Leaderboard Gamification on Medical Crowdfunding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1