{"title":"档案理论:神话还是平庸?","authors":"John W. Roberts","doi":"10.26512/RICI.V13.N3.2020.33102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Archival theory too often is trivial, overwrought, unnecessary, or irrelevant. While theory in other disciplines can produce new insights and stimulate intellectual progress, theory in archives cannot play an analogous role and cannot advance the archival profession. It tends to oversimplify that which is complicated and to overcomplicate that which is simple. Much archival theory is public relations Babbitry that threatens to over- stratify the profession.","PeriodicalId":41445,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciencia da Informacao","volume":"13 1","pages":"1039-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teoria arquivística: mito ou banalidade?\",\"authors\":\"John W. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.26512/RICI.V13.N3.2020.33102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Archival theory too often is trivial, overwrought, unnecessary, or irrelevant. While theory in other disciplines can produce new insights and stimulate intellectual progress, theory in archives cannot play an analogous role and cannot advance the archival profession. It tends to oversimplify that which is complicated and to overcomplicate that which is simple. Much archival theory is public relations Babbitry that threatens to over- stratify the profession.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciencia da Informacao\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1039-1054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciencia da Informacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26512/RICI.V13.N3.2020.33102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26512/RICI.V13.N3.2020.33102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Archival theory too often is trivial, overwrought, unnecessary, or irrelevant. While theory in other disciplines can produce new insights and stimulate intellectual progress, theory in archives cannot play an analogous role and cannot advance the archival profession. It tends to oversimplify that which is complicated and to overcomplicate that which is simple. Much archival theory is public relations Babbitry that threatens to over- stratify the profession.