当权利冲突:检视性别认同、性倾向与宗教歧视保护之间的冲突

A. Alteri
{"title":"当权利冲突:检视性别认同、性倾向与宗教歧视保护之间的冲突","authors":"A. Alteri","doi":"10.1177/13582291221096561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court extended federal employment discrimination protections to individuals based on their gender identity or sexual orientation. While this decision represents a victory for LGBTQIA+ employees, it did not speak to whether religious freedom laws would provide a suitable defense for violating this law. After this decision, we are left with an HR puzzle. When employment discrimination protections collide, what set of rights, those based on our religious beliefs or those based on our gender identity or sexual orientation, win out? Existing laws and Court cases suggest that individuals and corporations may be able to avoid the non-discrimination requirement by claiming a religious objection to an employee’s gender identity or sexual orientation, but this issue is far from settled. Accordingly, this paper provides legal analysis of the conflict and presents advice regarding how to foster an inclusive workplace and ensure that the rights of all are safeguarded.","PeriodicalId":42250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When rights collide: Examining conflicts between gender identity, sexual orientation, & religious discrimination protections\",\"authors\":\"A. Alteri\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13582291221096561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court extended federal employment discrimination protections to individuals based on their gender identity or sexual orientation. While this decision represents a victory for LGBTQIA+ employees, it did not speak to whether religious freedom laws would provide a suitable defense for violating this law. After this decision, we are left with an HR puzzle. When employment discrimination protections collide, what set of rights, those based on our religious beliefs or those based on our gender identity or sexual orientation, win out? Existing laws and Court cases suggest that individuals and corporations may be able to avoid the non-discrimination requirement by claiming a religious objection to an employee’s gender identity or sexual orientation, but this issue is far from settled. Accordingly, this paper provides legal analysis of the conflict and presents advice regarding how to foster an inclusive workplace and ensure that the rights of all are safeguarded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13582291221096561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13582291221096561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年,美国最高法院将联邦就业歧视保护扩大到基于性别认同或性取向的个人。虽然这一决定代表着LGBTQIA+员工的胜利,但它并没有说明宗教自由法是否会为违反这一法律提供适当的辩护。在做出这一决定后,我们将面临一个人力资源难题。当就业歧视保护发生冲突时,什么样的权利,基于我们的宗教信仰或基于我们的性别认同或性取向的权利,会胜出?现有法律和法院案例表明,个人和公司可以通过对员工的性别认同或性取向提出宗教异议来避免非歧视要求,但这一问题远未解决。因此,本文对冲突进行了法律分析,并就如何建立一个包容性的工作场所和确保所有人的权利得到保障提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When rights collide: Examining conflicts between gender identity, sexual orientation, & religious discrimination protections
In 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court extended federal employment discrimination protections to individuals based on their gender identity or sexual orientation. While this decision represents a victory for LGBTQIA+ employees, it did not speak to whether religious freedom laws would provide a suitable defense for violating this law. After this decision, we are left with an HR puzzle. When employment discrimination protections collide, what set of rights, those based on our religious beliefs or those based on our gender identity or sexual orientation, win out? Existing laws and Court cases suggest that individuals and corporations may be able to avoid the non-discrimination requirement by claiming a religious objection to an employee’s gender identity or sexual orientation, but this issue is far from settled. Accordingly, this paper provides legal analysis of the conflict and presents advice regarding how to foster an inclusive workplace and ensure that the rights of all are safeguarded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Intersectional discrimination and EU law: Time to revisit Parris Editorial - September 2024 The prohibition of discrimination and the workers’ right to maternity or paternity leave in light of the drafting history of Article 40 of the Constitution of Uganda and sections 56 and 57 of the Employment Act On the margins of refuge: Queer Syrian refugees and the politics of belonging and mobility in post-2019 Lebanon Legal status of the self-employed person in the field of social protection in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1