产科臂丛神经麻痹的危险因素

H. Belabbassi, Amina Imouloudene, H. Kaced
{"title":"产科臂丛神经麻痹的危险因素","authors":"H. Belabbassi, Amina Imouloudene, H. Kaced","doi":"10.4103/mj.mj_2_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study was aimed to identify the risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP). Patients and Methods: A retrospective case–control study was designed. A comparison was performed between cases of brachial plexus paralysis (n = 32), with controls without brachial plexus paralysis (n = 30) randomly selected from physical rehabilitation medicine examination. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Package. Results: Independent risk factors for brachial plexus paralysis were macrosomia (birth weight 4000 g; odds ratio [OR] = 12.353; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.510–60.802, P < 10−3), labor dystocia and instrumental vaginal delivery (forceps delivery and vacuum extraction; OR = 8.8; 95% CI 2.743–28.234, P < 10−3), and prolonged pregnancy (OR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.066–1.538, P = 0.011); however, vaginal breech delivery (breech presentation or extraction; OR = 3.231; 95% CI 0.598–17.456, P = 0.258), parity (OR = 2.545; 95% CI 0.677–9.565, P = 0.206), shoulder dystocia (OR = 1.957; 95% CI 0.571–6.702, P = 0.367), and after cesarean section (OR = 1.103; 95% CI 0.987–1.234, P = 0.238) do not represent any risk factor. Conclusions: In our population (n = 62), macrosomia, labor dystocia, instrumental vaginal delivery, and prolonged pregnancy were the significant risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus paralysis, while shoulder dystocia, breech deliveries, parity, and cesarean section were not. Despite our small sample, we found three significant risk factors associated with OBPP.","PeriodicalId":33069,"journal":{"name":"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy\",\"authors\":\"H. Belabbassi, Amina Imouloudene, H. Kaced\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mj.mj_2_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The study was aimed to identify the risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP). Patients and Methods: A retrospective case–control study was designed. A comparison was performed between cases of brachial plexus paralysis (n = 32), with controls without brachial plexus paralysis (n = 30) randomly selected from physical rehabilitation medicine examination. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Package. Results: Independent risk factors for brachial plexus paralysis were macrosomia (birth weight 4000 g; odds ratio [OR] = 12.353; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.510–60.802, P < 10−3), labor dystocia and instrumental vaginal delivery (forceps delivery and vacuum extraction; OR = 8.8; 95% CI 2.743–28.234, P < 10−3), and prolonged pregnancy (OR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.066–1.538, P = 0.011); however, vaginal breech delivery (breech presentation or extraction; OR = 3.231; 95% CI 0.598–17.456, P = 0.258), parity (OR = 2.545; 95% CI 0.677–9.565, P = 0.206), shoulder dystocia (OR = 1.957; 95% CI 0.571–6.702, P = 0.367), and after cesarean section (OR = 1.103; 95% CI 0.987–1.234, P = 0.238) do not represent any risk factor. Conclusions: In our population (n = 62), macrosomia, labor dystocia, instrumental vaginal delivery, and prolonged pregnancy were the significant risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus paralysis, while shoulder dystocia, breech deliveries, parity, and cesarean section were not. Despite our small sample, we found three significant risk factors associated with OBPP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mj.mj_2_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mj.mj_2_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨产科臂丛神经麻痹的危险因素。患者和方法:设计了一项回顾性病例对照研究。对臂丛神经麻痹病例(n=32)和从物理康复医学检查中随机选择的非臂丛神经瘫痪对照组(n=30)进行比较。使用SPSS软件包进行统计分析。结果:臂丛神经麻痹的独立危险因素为巨大儿(出生体重4000 g;比值比[OR]=12.353;95%置信区间[CI]2.510–60.802,P<10−3)、难产和工具性阴道分娩(产钳分娩和真空拔出;OR=8.8;95%CI 2.743–28.234,P<0−3)以及妊娠期延长(OR=1.28;95%CI 1.066–1.538,P=0.011);然而,经阴道臀位分娩(臀位出现或拔出;or=3.231;95%CI 0.598–17.456,P=0.258)、产次(or=2.545;95%CI 0.677–9.565,P=0.206)、肩难产(or=1.957;95%CI 0.5 71–6.702,P=0.367)和剖宫产后(or=1.103;95%CI 0.987–1.234,P=0.238)并不代表任何危险因素。结论:在我们的人群(n=62)中,巨大儿、难产、工具阴道分娩和长期妊娠是新生儿臂丛神经麻痹的重要危险因素,而肩难产、臀位分娩、产程和剖宫产则不是。尽管我们的样本很小,但我们发现了三个与OBPP相关的重要风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy
Objective: The study was aimed to identify the risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP). Patients and Methods: A retrospective case–control study was designed. A comparison was performed between cases of brachial plexus paralysis (n = 32), with controls without brachial plexus paralysis (n = 30) randomly selected from physical rehabilitation medicine examination. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Package. Results: Independent risk factors for brachial plexus paralysis were macrosomia (birth weight 4000 g; odds ratio [OR] = 12.353; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.510–60.802, P < 10−3), labor dystocia and instrumental vaginal delivery (forceps delivery and vacuum extraction; OR = 8.8; 95% CI 2.743–28.234, P < 10−3), and prolonged pregnancy (OR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.066–1.538, P = 0.011); however, vaginal breech delivery (breech presentation or extraction; OR = 3.231; 95% CI 0.598–17.456, P = 0.258), parity (OR = 2.545; 95% CI 0.677–9.565, P = 0.206), shoulder dystocia (OR = 1.957; 95% CI 0.571–6.702, P = 0.367), and after cesarean section (OR = 1.103; 95% CI 0.987–1.234, P = 0.238) do not represent any risk factor. Conclusions: In our population (n = 62), macrosomia, labor dystocia, instrumental vaginal delivery, and prolonged pregnancy were the significant risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus paralysis, while shoulder dystocia, breech deliveries, parity, and cesarean section were not. Despite our small sample, we found three significant risk factors associated with OBPP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of activity of xanthine oxidase on some biomarkers in patients with kidney stones in Iraqi Patients Blood lead level and renal function: Sample of Iraqi patients attending Baghdad Teaching Hospital in 2022 Morphometric measurements of carrying angle of the elbow among sample of Iraqi medical students: An observational, cross-sectional study Dimensions of the sphenoid and ethmoid sinuses on computed tomography: Clinical implications and role in sex determination Study of the link between ligament laxity and the occurrence of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1