可持续发展平衡计分卡架构与环境投资决策

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT Foundations of Management Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2478/fman-2020-0015
Suaad Jassem, Z. Zakaria, Anna Che Azmi
{"title":"可持续发展平衡计分卡架构与环境投资决策","authors":"Suaad Jassem, Z. Zakaria, Anna Che Azmi","doi":"10.2478/fman-2020-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study is centered around a set of research questions that aim to explain how sustainability balanced scorecard architectures with sustainability parameters either embedded or treated as a separate perspective relate to environmental investment decision-making. The research also examines the mediating role of sustainability balanced scorecard knowledge and moderating role of strategic risk information. This article presents the results and answers to the research questions via conducting an experimental study approach using a two-factor factorial design. This is possibly the first study that determines, through an experimental procedure conducted with managers working in large manufacturing companies, whether any significant difference exists in environmental investment decision outcomes when decision-makers are presented with either an architecture where sustainability is embedded with the traditional four perspectives of balanced scorecards versus when it is presented as a separate fifth perspective. Furthermore, the development of an integrated model is possibly a significant contribution to the extant literature.","PeriodicalId":43250,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"193 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making\",\"authors\":\"Suaad Jassem, Z. Zakaria, Anna Che Azmi\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/fman-2020-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study is centered around a set of research questions that aim to explain how sustainability balanced scorecard architectures with sustainability parameters either embedded or treated as a separate perspective relate to environmental investment decision-making. The research also examines the mediating role of sustainability balanced scorecard knowledge and moderating role of strategic risk information. This article presents the results and answers to the research questions via conducting an experimental study approach using a two-factor factorial design. This is possibly the first study that determines, through an experimental procedure conducted with managers working in large manufacturing companies, whether any significant difference exists in environmental investment decision outcomes when decision-makers are presented with either an architecture where sustainability is embedded with the traditional four perspectives of balanced scorecards versus when it is presented as a separate fifth perspective. Furthermore, the development of an integrated model is possibly a significant contribution to the extant literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations of Management\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"193 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2020-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2020-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究围绕一系列研究问题,旨在解释具有可持续性参数的可持续性平衡计分卡架构如何与环境投资决策相关。研究还考察了可持续性平衡计分卡知识的中介作用和战略风险信息的调节作用。本文通过采用双因素析因设计的实验研究方法,提出了研究结果和研究问题的答案。这可能是第一项研究,通过对大型制造公司的管理人员进行的实验程序来确定,当决策者看到可持续性嵌入平衡计分卡的传统四个视角的架构时,环境投资决策结果是否存在显著差异,而当决策者看到可持续性作为一个单独的第五个视角时。此外,综合模型的发展可能是对现有文献的重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making
Abstract This study is centered around a set of research questions that aim to explain how sustainability balanced scorecard architectures with sustainability parameters either embedded or treated as a separate perspective relate to environmental investment decision-making. The research also examines the mediating role of sustainability balanced scorecard knowledge and moderating role of strategic risk information. This article presents the results and answers to the research questions via conducting an experimental study approach using a two-factor factorial design. This is possibly the first study that determines, through an experimental procedure conducted with managers working in large manufacturing companies, whether any significant difference exists in environmental investment decision outcomes when decision-makers are presented with either an architecture where sustainability is embedded with the traditional four perspectives of balanced scorecards versus when it is presented as a separate fifth perspective. Furthermore, the development of an integrated model is possibly a significant contribution to the extant literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Cluster Support Based on the Example of the European Cluster Excellence Initiative The Method of Determining the Technical Costs of Manufacturing Products Contemporary Consumer Trends A Few Notes On Art Auctions Critical Understanding of Existing Entrepreneurial Marketing Models: 2002 – 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1