个人得失对朋友赌博结果评价的影响:来自ERP的证据

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY 心理学报 Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00651
Tong Yue, Xiting Huang, Caizhen Yue, Liming Xue, Anguo Fu
{"title":"个人得失对朋友赌博结果评价的影响:来自ERP的证据","authors":"Tong Yue, Xiting Huang, Caizhen Yue, Liming Xue, Anguo Fu","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"on the evaluation of friends’ gains and losses would differ under different modes of self-construction. The results indicated that in the interdependent self-construction initiation group, the electrophysiological response mode that results from watching friends’ gambling was consistent with the result obtained in Experiment 1. However, after initiation of the independent self-construction of the subjects, the evaluation mode of the gambling results of a friend differed from that of the interdependent self-construction initiation group. In terms of the FRN index, regardless of one’s own gains and losses, the differences in FRN for friends’ gains and losses were no longer significant. In terms of the P300 index, the P300 discrepancy resulting from watching the gains and losses of a friend after suffering own losses was not significant. However, after having gained benefits, a higher P300 amplitude was induced by watching friends losing money in gambling than when watching them gain money. In summary, this study shows that: (1) the evaluation model for one’s friends’ gains and losses differs depending on the own experienced gains and losses. Under favorable conditions, an individual is more inclined to show indifference to his friends’ gains and losses, which may be because the individual employs stronger egocentric tendency in such a case. (2) The independent self-construction initiation group shows more indifference and competition when observing the gains and losses of a friend than in case of the interdependent self-construction group.","PeriodicalId":36627,"journal":{"name":"心理学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of an individual’s own gains and losses on the evaluation of friends’ gambling results: Evidence from ERPs\",\"authors\":\"Tong Yue, Xiting Huang, Caizhen Yue, Liming Xue, Anguo Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"on the evaluation of friends’ gains and losses would differ under different modes of self-construction. The results indicated that in the interdependent self-construction initiation group, the electrophysiological response mode that results from watching friends’ gambling was consistent with the result obtained in Experiment 1. However, after initiation of the independent self-construction of the subjects, the evaluation mode of the gambling results of a friend differed from that of the interdependent self-construction initiation group. In terms of the FRN index, regardless of one’s own gains and losses, the differences in FRN for friends’ gains and losses were no longer significant. In terms of the P300 index, the P300 discrepancy resulting from watching the gains and losses of a friend after suffering own losses was not significant. However, after having gained benefits, a higher P300 amplitude was induced by watching friends losing money in gambling than when watching them gain money. In summary, this study shows that: (1) the evaluation model for one’s friends’ gains and losses differs depending on the own experienced gains and losses. Under favorable conditions, an individual is more inclined to show indifference to his friends’ gains and losses, which may be because the individual employs stronger egocentric tendency in such a case. (2) The independent self-construction initiation group shows more indifference and competition when observing the gains and losses of a friend than in case of the interdependent self-construction group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"心理学报\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"心理学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00651\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"心理学报","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在不同的自我建构模式下,对朋友得失的评价会有所不同。结果表明,在相互依存的自我建构启动组中,观看朋友赌博产生的电生理反应模式与实验1的结果一致。然而,在受试者开始独立的自我建构后,朋友对赌博结果的评价模式与相互依存的自我建构启动组不同。在FRN指数方面,无论自己的得失,朋友得失的FRN差异不再显著。在P300指数方面,观察朋友在遭受自身损失后的得失所产生的P300差异并不显著。然而,在获得利益后,观看朋友在赌博中输钱会比观看他们赚钱时诱发更高的P300振幅。总之,本研究表明:(1)对朋友得失的评价模型因自己经历的得失而不同。在有利的条件下,个人更倾向于对朋友的得失漠不关心,这可能是因为在这种情况下,个人表现出更强的自我中心倾向。(2) 独立的自我构建启动组在观察朋友的得失时比相互依赖的自我构建组表现出更多的冷漠和竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of an individual’s own gains and losses on the evaluation of friends’ gambling results: Evidence from ERPs
on the evaluation of friends’ gains and losses would differ under different modes of self-construction. The results indicated that in the interdependent self-construction initiation group, the electrophysiological response mode that results from watching friends’ gambling was consistent with the result obtained in Experiment 1. However, after initiation of the independent self-construction of the subjects, the evaluation mode of the gambling results of a friend differed from that of the interdependent self-construction initiation group. In terms of the FRN index, regardless of one’s own gains and losses, the differences in FRN for friends’ gains and losses were no longer significant. In terms of the P300 index, the P300 discrepancy resulting from watching the gains and losses of a friend after suffering own losses was not significant. However, after having gained benefits, a higher P300 amplitude was induced by watching friends losing money in gambling than when watching them gain money. In summary, this study shows that: (1) the evaluation model for one’s friends’ gains and losses differs depending on the own experienced gains and losses. Under favorable conditions, an individual is more inclined to show indifference to his friends’ gains and losses, which may be because the individual employs stronger egocentric tendency in such a case. (2) The independent self-construction initiation group shows more indifference and competition when observing the gains and losses of a friend than in case of the interdependent self-construction group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
心理学报
心理学报 Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1612
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Opportunity (in)equity affects outcome evaluation at an early cognitive stage: Evidence from event-related potentials How the dimension of negative emotional motivation influences time perception: The mediating role of attention control and attention bias Identity embarrassment and identity defense: The development of organizational identity of dispatched employees The double-edged sword effect of employee personal initiative behavior on coworker relationships: The moderating role of the employee warmth trait The role of stroke nodes in the recognition of Chinese characters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1