智能生物混凝土抗压强度预测的机器学习和RSM模型

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Smart Structures and Systems Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.12989/SSS.2021.28.4.535
H. A. Algaifi, Suhaimi Abu Bakar, Rayed Alyousef, A. M. Sam, Ali S Alqarni, M. Ibrahim, S. Shahidan, M. Ibrahim, B. Salami
{"title":"智能生物混凝土抗压强度预测的机器学习和RSM模型","authors":"H. A. Algaifi, Suhaimi Abu Bakar, Rayed Alyousef, A. M. Sam, Ali S Alqarni, M. Ibrahim, S. Shahidan, M. Ibrahim, B. Salami","doi":"10.12989/SSS.2021.28.4.535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, bacteria-based self-healing concrete has been widely exploited to improve the compressive strength of concrete using different bacterial species. However, both the identification of the optimal involved reaction parameters and theoretical framework information are still limited. In the present study, both experimentally and numerical modelling using machine learning (ANN and ANFIS) and response surface methodology (RSM) were implemented to evaluate and optimse the evolution of bacterial concrete strength. Therefore, a total of 58 compressive strength tests of the concrete incorporating new bacterial species were designed using different concentrations of urea, cells concentration, calcium, nutrient and time. Based on the results, the compressive strength of the bacterial concrete improved by 16% due to the decrement of the pore percentage in the concrete skin; specifically, 5 mm from the concrete surface, compared to that of the control concrete. In the same context, both machine the learning and RSM models indicated that the optimal range of urea, calcium, nutrient and bacterial cells were (18-23 g/L), (150-350 mM), (1-3 g/L) and 2×107 cells/mL, respectively. Based on the statistical analysis, RMSE, R2, MPE, RAE and RRSE were (0.793, 0.785), (0.985, 0.986), (1.508, 1.1), (0.11, 0.09) and (0.121, 0.12) from both the ANN and ANFIS models, respectively, while; the following values (0.839, 0.972, 1.678, 0.131 and 0.165) was obtained from RSM model, respectively. As such, it can be concluded that a high correlation and minimum error were obtained, however, machine learning models provided more accurate results compared to that of the RSM model.","PeriodicalId":51155,"journal":{"name":"Smart Structures and Systems","volume":"28 1","pages":"535-551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning and RSM models for prediction of compressive strength of smart bio-concrete\",\"authors\":\"H. A. Algaifi, Suhaimi Abu Bakar, Rayed Alyousef, A. M. Sam, Ali S Alqarni, M. Ibrahim, S. Shahidan, M. Ibrahim, B. Salami\",\"doi\":\"10.12989/SSS.2021.28.4.535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, bacteria-based self-healing concrete has been widely exploited to improve the compressive strength of concrete using different bacterial species. However, both the identification of the optimal involved reaction parameters and theoretical framework information are still limited. In the present study, both experimentally and numerical modelling using machine learning (ANN and ANFIS) and response surface methodology (RSM) were implemented to evaluate and optimse the evolution of bacterial concrete strength. Therefore, a total of 58 compressive strength tests of the concrete incorporating new bacterial species were designed using different concentrations of urea, cells concentration, calcium, nutrient and time. Based on the results, the compressive strength of the bacterial concrete improved by 16% due to the decrement of the pore percentage in the concrete skin; specifically, 5 mm from the concrete surface, compared to that of the control concrete. In the same context, both machine the learning and RSM models indicated that the optimal range of urea, calcium, nutrient and bacterial cells were (18-23 g/L), (150-350 mM), (1-3 g/L) and 2×107 cells/mL, respectively. Based on the statistical analysis, RMSE, R2, MPE, RAE and RRSE were (0.793, 0.785), (0.985, 0.986), (1.508, 1.1), (0.11, 0.09) and (0.121, 0.12) from both the ANN and ANFIS models, respectively, while; the following values (0.839, 0.972, 1.678, 0.131 and 0.165) was obtained from RSM model, respectively. As such, it can be concluded that a high correlation and minimum error were obtained, however, machine learning models provided more accurate results compared to that of the RSM model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart Structures and Systems\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"535-551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart Structures and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2021.28.4.535\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Structures and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2021.28.4.535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

近年来,基于细菌的自修复混凝土已被广泛开发,以使用不同的细菌种类来提高混凝土的抗压强度。然而,最优反应参数的确定和理论框架信息仍然有限。在本研究中,使用机器学习(ANN和ANFIS)和响应面方法(RSM)进行了实验和数值建模,以评估和优化细菌混凝土强度的演变。因此,使用不同浓度的尿素、细胞浓度、钙、营养素和时间,设计了总共58个含有新细菌的混凝土抗压强度试验。结果表明,由于混凝土表层孔隙百分比的降低,细菌混凝土的抗压强度提高了16%;具体地说,与对照混凝土相比,距离混凝土表面5mm。在相同的情况下,机器学习和RSM模型都表明,尿素、钙、营养物和细菌细胞的最佳范围分别为(18-23 g/L)、(150-350 mM)、(1-3 g/L)和2×107个细胞/mL。基于统计分析,ANN和ANFIS模型的RMSE、R2、MPE、RAE和RRSE分别为(0.793、0.785)、(0.985、0.986)、(1.508、1.1)、(0.11、0.09)和(0.121、0.12);从RSM模型中分别获得以下值(0.839、0.972、1.678、0.131和0.165)。因此,可以得出结论,获得了高相关性和最小误差,然而,与RSM模型相比,机器学习模型提供了更准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning and RSM models for prediction of compressive strength of smart bio-concrete
In recent years, bacteria-based self-healing concrete has been widely exploited to improve the compressive strength of concrete using different bacterial species. However, both the identification of the optimal involved reaction parameters and theoretical framework information are still limited. In the present study, both experimentally and numerical modelling using machine learning (ANN and ANFIS) and response surface methodology (RSM) were implemented to evaluate and optimse the evolution of bacterial concrete strength. Therefore, a total of 58 compressive strength tests of the concrete incorporating new bacterial species were designed using different concentrations of urea, cells concentration, calcium, nutrient and time. Based on the results, the compressive strength of the bacterial concrete improved by 16% due to the decrement of the pore percentage in the concrete skin; specifically, 5 mm from the concrete surface, compared to that of the control concrete. In the same context, both machine the learning and RSM models indicated that the optimal range of urea, calcium, nutrient and bacterial cells were (18-23 g/L), (150-350 mM), (1-3 g/L) and 2×107 cells/mL, respectively. Based on the statistical analysis, RMSE, R2, MPE, RAE and RRSE were (0.793, 0.785), (0.985, 0.986), (1.508, 1.1), (0.11, 0.09) and (0.121, 0.12) from both the ANN and ANFIS models, respectively, while; the following values (0.839, 0.972, 1.678, 0.131 and 0.165) was obtained from RSM model, respectively. As such, it can be concluded that a high correlation and minimum error were obtained, however, machine learning models provided more accurate results compared to that of the RSM model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Structures and Systems
Smart Structures and Systems 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: An International Journal of Mechatronics, Sensors, Monitoring, Control, Diagnosis, and Management airns at providing a major publication channel for researchers in the general area of smart structures and systems. Typical subjects considered by the journal include: Sensors/Actuators(Materials/devices/ informatics/networking) Structural Health Monitoring and Control Diagnosis/Prognosis Life Cycle Engineering(planning/design/ maintenance/renewal) and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Analysis, optimization and control of an adaptive tuned vibration absorber featuring magnetoactive materials Numerical investigation on cyclic behaviour of superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) dampers Hybrid fragility curve derivation of buildings based on post-earthquake reconnaissance data A corrosion threshold-controllable sensing system of Fe-C coated long period fiber gratings for life-cycle mass loss measurement of steel bars with strain and temperature compensation Steel dual-ring dampers: Micro-finite element modelling and validation of cyclic behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1