重复作为当代戏剧审问场景中语言和心理暴力的手段

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ars & Humanitas Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI:10.4312/ars.14.1.13-26
Tomaz Onic, Nastja Prajnč Kacijan
{"title":"重复作为当代戏剧审问场景中语言和心理暴力的手段","authors":"Tomaz Onic, Nastja Prajnč Kacijan","doi":"10.4312/ars.14.1.13-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Repetition is a common linguistic element in literary as well as non-literary discourse. In A Dictionary of Stylistics, Katie Wales draws attention to the two sets of effects it can produce in everyday use: it can be an unwanted redundancy as well as a “powerful resource of interpersonal involvement and rapport” (2014, 366). While the former is not characteristic of quality literature, the latter can be a potent stylistic tool for achieving a range of effects. Paul Simpson (2004, 50) refers to repetition as one of the main principles in forming textual patterns (e.g., foregrounding), thus bringing certain features of the text to the front of the reader’s or – in the case of staged drama – viewer’s attention. Similarly, Michael Burke (2014, 25-28) sees repetition as one of the significant features in stylistics, next to parallelism and deviation, but suggests that the concepts concerning its function need to be further developed and researched. John Cuddon credits repetition in literature with a structural function, denoting it an “essential unifying element in nearly all poetry and much prose” (1999, 742), while understanding it in broad terms: as repetition of words, phrases, stanzas or longer excerpts, even sounds and other stylistic or linguistic phenomena. Edward Quinn (2006, 359-60) extends this definition to the employment of repeated images with an impact on the imagery of the work, as well as to visual context, by acknowledging repetition as a technique in film. This makes repetition applicable to all absolute genres, in Szondi’s (2000, 30-31) sense, and most particularly to drama. An extensive overview of research about repetition in spoken conversation was provided by Deborah Tannen (2007). Several authors she mentions (e.g., Schegloff, 1997; Rieger, 2003; Linell, 1982; Svennevig, 2004, and others, cit. in Tannen (15-16)) as well as Tannen herself emphasize the importance of considering the sound aspect – particularly intonation – in the analysis of repetition patterns: “the very notion that the repetition of words spoken in conversation is ‘exact’ repetition holds only if we think of words as they would appear in a dictionary, stripped of their sound” (2007, 16). This suggests that the semantic potential of voice quality, i.e., volume, intonation, stress and other phonetic aspects, is too often ignored. These findings are particularly","PeriodicalId":40773,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"14 1","pages":"13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetition as a means of verbal and psychological violence in interrogation scenes from contemporary drama\",\"authors\":\"Tomaz Onic, Nastja Prajnč Kacijan\",\"doi\":\"10.4312/ars.14.1.13-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Repetition is a common linguistic element in literary as well as non-literary discourse. In A Dictionary of Stylistics, Katie Wales draws attention to the two sets of effects it can produce in everyday use: it can be an unwanted redundancy as well as a “powerful resource of interpersonal involvement and rapport” (2014, 366). While the former is not characteristic of quality literature, the latter can be a potent stylistic tool for achieving a range of effects. Paul Simpson (2004, 50) refers to repetition as one of the main principles in forming textual patterns (e.g., foregrounding), thus bringing certain features of the text to the front of the reader’s or – in the case of staged drama – viewer’s attention. Similarly, Michael Burke (2014, 25-28) sees repetition as one of the significant features in stylistics, next to parallelism and deviation, but suggests that the concepts concerning its function need to be further developed and researched. John Cuddon credits repetition in literature with a structural function, denoting it an “essential unifying element in nearly all poetry and much prose” (1999, 742), while understanding it in broad terms: as repetition of words, phrases, stanzas or longer excerpts, even sounds and other stylistic or linguistic phenomena. Edward Quinn (2006, 359-60) extends this definition to the employment of repeated images with an impact on the imagery of the work, as well as to visual context, by acknowledging repetition as a technique in film. This makes repetition applicable to all absolute genres, in Szondi’s (2000, 30-31) sense, and most particularly to drama. An extensive overview of research about repetition in spoken conversation was provided by Deborah Tannen (2007). Several authors she mentions (e.g., Schegloff, 1997; Rieger, 2003; Linell, 1982; Svennevig, 2004, and others, cit. in Tannen (15-16)) as well as Tannen herself emphasize the importance of considering the sound aspect – particularly intonation – in the analysis of repetition patterns: “the very notion that the repetition of words spoken in conversation is ‘exact’ repetition holds only if we think of words as they would appear in a dictionary, stripped of their sound” (2007, 16). This suggests that the semantic potential of voice quality, i.e., volume, intonation, stress and other phonetic aspects, is too often ignored. These findings are particularly\",\"PeriodicalId\":40773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars & Humanitas\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"13-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars & Humanitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.14.1.13-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars & Humanitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.14.1.13-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

重复是文学和非文学话语中常见的语言元素。在《文体学词典》中,凯蒂·威尔士提请注意它在日常使用中可能产生的两组效果:它可以是不必要的冗余,也可以是“人际关系参与和融洽的强大资源”(2014年,366)。虽然前者不是优质文学的特征,但后者可以成为实现一系列效果的有力风格工具。Paul Simpson(2004,50)认为重复是形成文本模式(例如,前景)的主要原则之一,从而将文本的某些特征带到读者或(在舞台剧的情况下)观众的注意力的前面。同样,Michael Burke(2014, 25-28)认为重复是文体学的重要特征之一,仅次于平行和偏离,但他认为有关其功能的概念需要进一步发展和研究。John Cuddon认为文学中的重复具有结构功能,表示它是“几乎所有诗歌和许多散文中必不可少的统一元素”(1999,742),同时从广义上理解它:单词,短语,节或更长的节选,甚至声音和其他文体或语言现象的重复。Edward Quinn(2006, 359-60)通过承认重复是电影中的一种技术,将这一定义扩展到对作品图像以及视觉环境产生影响的重复图像的使用。这使得重复适用于所有绝对类型,在Szondi(2000,30 -31)的意义上,尤其是戏剧。Deborah Tannen(2007)对口语对话中的重复进行了广泛的研究。她提到的几位作者(例如,Schegloff, 1997;Rieger, 2003;王晓路,1982;Svennevig(2004)和其他人(参见Tannen(15-16))以及Tannen自己强调了在重复模式分析中考虑声音方面——特别是语调——的重要性:“只有当我们把单词看作字典中出现的单词,去掉它们的声音,对话中所说的单词的重复才是‘精确的’重复的概念才会有效”(2007,16)。这表明语音质量的语义潜力,即音量、语调、重音和其他语音方面,往往被忽视。这些发现特别
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repetition as a means of verbal and psychological violence in interrogation scenes from contemporary drama
Repetition is a common linguistic element in literary as well as non-literary discourse. In A Dictionary of Stylistics, Katie Wales draws attention to the two sets of effects it can produce in everyday use: it can be an unwanted redundancy as well as a “powerful resource of interpersonal involvement and rapport” (2014, 366). While the former is not characteristic of quality literature, the latter can be a potent stylistic tool for achieving a range of effects. Paul Simpson (2004, 50) refers to repetition as one of the main principles in forming textual patterns (e.g., foregrounding), thus bringing certain features of the text to the front of the reader’s or – in the case of staged drama – viewer’s attention. Similarly, Michael Burke (2014, 25-28) sees repetition as one of the significant features in stylistics, next to parallelism and deviation, but suggests that the concepts concerning its function need to be further developed and researched. John Cuddon credits repetition in literature with a structural function, denoting it an “essential unifying element in nearly all poetry and much prose” (1999, 742), while understanding it in broad terms: as repetition of words, phrases, stanzas or longer excerpts, even sounds and other stylistic or linguistic phenomena. Edward Quinn (2006, 359-60) extends this definition to the employment of repeated images with an impact on the imagery of the work, as well as to visual context, by acknowledging repetition as a technique in film. This makes repetition applicable to all absolute genres, in Szondi’s (2000, 30-31) sense, and most particularly to drama. An extensive overview of research about repetition in spoken conversation was provided by Deborah Tannen (2007). Several authors she mentions (e.g., Schegloff, 1997; Rieger, 2003; Linell, 1982; Svennevig, 2004, and others, cit. in Tannen (15-16)) as well as Tannen herself emphasize the importance of considering the sound aspect – particularly intonation – in the analysis of repetition patterns: “the very notion that the repetition of words spoken in conversation is ‘exact’ repetition holds only if we think of words as they would appear in a dictionary, stripped of their sound” (2007, 16). This suggests that the semantic potential of voice quality, i.e., volume, intonation, stress and other phonetic aspects, is too often ignored. These findings are particularly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ars & Humanitas
Ars & Humanitas HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contactos e intercambios entre las literaturas de Europa Central y del Sureste y de América Latina durante la Guerra Fría Eslovenia y la Guerra Fría cultural The importance of separating the author from the narrative in modern and classical literature Zagovornik literarne izobrazbe pisateljev in kritikov Alkoholizem v delih slovenskih in čeških pisateljic dolgega 19. stoletja
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1