越南湄公河三角洲合同参与预测——人工神经网络与多项式Logit模型的比较

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization Pub Date : 2021-01-20 DOI:10.1515/JAFIO-2020-0023
H. Dang, T. Pham
{"title":"越南湄公河三角洲合同参与预测——人工神经网络与多项式Logit模型的比较","authors":"H. Dang, T. Pham","doi":"10.1515/JAFIO-2020-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The research aims of this study are bi-fold: to study factors influencing the uptake of contract farming (CF) and to compare the predicting power of the artificial neural network model (ANN) and the Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) on predicting CF participation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. ANN and MNL were employed to analyze on the basis of the transaction cost theory. To validate the ANN, a 10-fold cross-validation procedure was applied to avoid model overfitting. The sensitivity analysis of ANN was used to elicit the magnitude of the correlation between predictors. Multicollinearity was examined with all VIFs lower than two. Among predictors, the most influential roles of the cooperatives and the extension agents/services in supporting CF participation are reported. Also, farmers who conduct frequent access to the market incline to participate in CF. Risk perceptions and preferences are dissimilar across domains, which are also mainly interpreted that risk-averse farmers tend to opt for CF as an effective solution to risks perceived. Thus, heterogeneous approaches should be tailored to promote CF. The findings suggest that MNL outperforms ANN in terms of accuracy percentage and mean absolute error (MAE). However, this result should not be generalized base on the constraint of the data threshold as articulated in the study. The sensitivity analysis of ANN and the estimation results of the MNL relatively agreed on the importance of model predictors. This study is the first to investigate the impacts of the domain-specific risk perceptions and attitudes on CF and also contribute to the debate over the performance between the conventional econometric models versus machine learning techniques.","PeriodicalId":52541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/JAFIO-2020-0023","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Contract Participation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: A Comparison Between the Artificial Neural Network and the Multinomial Logit Model\",\"authors\":\"H. Dang, T. Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/JAFIO-2020-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The research aims of this study are bi-fold: to study factors influencing the uptake of contract farming (CF) and to compare the predicting power of the artificial neural network model (ANN) and the Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) on predicting CF participation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. ANN and MNL were employed to analyze on the basis of the transaction cost theory. To validate the ANN, a 10-fold cross-validation procedure was applied to avoid model overfitting. The sensitivity analysis of ANN was used to elicit the magnitude of the correlation between predictors. Multicollinearity was examined with all VIFs lower than two. Among predictors, the most influential roles of the cooperatives and the extension agents/services in supporting CF participation are reported. Also, farmers who conduct frequent access to the market incline to participate in CF. Risk perceptions and preferences are dissimilar across domains, which are also mainly interpreted that risk-averse farmers tend to opt for CF as an effective solution to risks perceived. Thus, heterogeneous approaches should be tailored to promote CF. The findings suggest that MNL outperforms ANN in terms of accuracy percentage and mean absolute error (MAE). However, this result should not be generalized base on the constraint of the data threshold as articulated in the study. The sensitivity analysis of ANN and the estimation results of the MNL relatively agreed on the importance of model predictors. This study is the first to investigate the impacts of the domain-specific risk perceptions and attitudes on CF and also contribute to the debate over the performance between the conventional econometric models versus machine learning techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/JAFIO-2020-0023\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/JAFIO-2020-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JAFIO-2020-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本研究的研究目的是双重的:研究影响越南湄公河三角洲地区承包农业(CF)吸收的因素,并比较人工神经网络模型(ANN)和多项Logit模型(MNL)对越南湄公河三角洲地区承包农业参与的预测能力。在交易成本理论的基础上,采用人工神经网络和MNL进行分析。为了验证人工神经网络,采用了10倍交叉验证程序来避免模型过拟合。使用人工神经网络的敏感性分析来得出预测因子之间的相关性程度。所有vif均小于2时,检验多重共线性。报告指出,在预测因素中,合作社和推广机构/服务机构在支持CF参与方面发挥了最具影响力的作用。此外,频繁进入市场的农民倾向于参与CF。不同领域的风险感知和偏好不同,这也主要解释为风险厌恶的农民倾向于选择CF作为感知风险的有效解决方案。因此,应该定制异构方法来促进CF。研究结果表明,MNL在准确率和平均绝对误差(MAE)方面优于ANN。然而,这一结果不应该基于研究中所阐述的数据阈值的约束而一般化。人工神经网络的敏感性分析与MNL的估计结果在模型预测因子的重要性上比较一致。这项研究首次调查了特定领域的风险感知和态度对CF的影响,也有助于传统计量经济模型与机器学习技术之间的性能争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Contract Participation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: A Comparison Between the Artificial Neural Network and the Multinomial Logit Model
Abstract The research aims of this study are bi-fold: to study factors influencing the uptake of contract farming (CF) and to compare the predicting power of the artificial neural network model (ANN) and the Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) on predicting CF participation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. ANN and MNL were employed to analyze on the basis of the transaction cost theory. To validate the ANN, a 10-fold cross-validation procedure was applied to avoid model overfitting. The sensitivity analysis of ANN was used to elicit the magnitude of the correlation between predictors. Multicollinearity was examined with all VIFs lower than two. Among predictors, the most influential roles of the cooperatives and the extension agents/services in supporting CF participation are reported. Also, farmers who conduct frequent access to the market incline to participate in CF. Risk perceptions and preferences are dissimilar across domains, which are also mainly interpreted that risk-averse farmers tend to opt for CF as an effective solution to risks perceived. Thus, heterogeneous approaches should be tailored to promote CF. The findings suggest that MNL outperforms ANN in terms of accuracy percentage and mean absolute error (MAE). However, this result should not be generalized base on the constraint of the data threshold as articulated in the study. The sensitivity analysis of ANN and the estimation results of the MNL relatively agreed on the importance of model predictors. This study is the first to investigate the impacts of the domain-specific risk perceptions and attitudes on CF and also contribute to the debate over the performance between the conventional econometric models versus machine learning techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization
Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization (JAFIO) is a unique forum for empirical and theoretical research in industrial organization with a special focus on agricultural and food industries worldwide. As concentration, industrialization, and globalization continue to reshape horizontal and vertical relationships within the food supply chain, agricultural economists are revising both their views of traditional markets as well as their tools of analysis. At the core of this revision are strategic interactions between principals and agents, strategic interdependence between rival firms, and strategic trade policy between competing nations, all in a setting plagued by incomplete and/or imperfect information structures. Add to that biotechnology, electronic commerce, as well as the shift in focus from raw agricultural commodities to branded products, and the conclusion is that a "new" agricultural economics is needed for an increasingly complex "new" agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Implementing Antitrust Regulations in Dynamic Industries: The Case of the U.S. Cottonseed Industry Pandemic Produce: Impacts of COVID-19 on Florida’s Fruit and Vegetable Industries The Impact of COVID-19 on World Oil Producers: Time is Important COVID-19 Impacts on United States Crawfish Impacts of COVID-19 on U.S. Seafood Availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1