The effect of the growth ring orientation on spring-back and set-recovery in surface-densified wood

Abstract Wood under thermo-mechanical densification behaves differently depending on the cross-sectional growth ring orientation (GRO) relative to the direction of compression. This influences the degree of cell damage, but also the shape-memory effects occurring when the compression load is released (spring-back) and when the timber is re-moistened (set-recovery). To study how the GRO influences the shape-memory effects, Scots pine specimens were separated into three distinct groups of GRO (Flat, Inclined, Hybrid) and then thermo-mechanically surface-densified. Spring-back and set-recovery were determined by thickness measurements and by digital image correlation. A GRO parallel to the densified surface, resulted in a low spring-back and a high set-recovery which were uniform over the width of the specimen. Specimens with a GRO between 15 and 45° to the densified surface showed high spring-back and low set-recovery, indicating cell-wall damage. Spring-back mainly occurred in the non-plasticised region immediately below the heated surface region and elasto-plastic rolling-shear deformation along individual growth rings occurred. The GRO of softwood subjected to thermo-mechanical densification determines if an applied load results in rolling shear-deformation or radial compression. This in turn determines where in the cross-section and when in the process the cells deform and if this deformation occurs below or above the glass-transition temperature.