GÓmez-torrente参考普通物质

IF 0.2 4区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Manuscrito Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n4.mx

Martín Abreu Zavaleta

{"title":"GÓmez-torrente参考普通物质","authors":"Martín Abreu Zavaleta","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n4.mx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": According to the Kripke-Putnam orthodoxy, a term like 'water' refers to samples of the same substance as the items on the basis of which the term was introduced. However, observations due to Needham (2000) and Leslie (2013) cast doubt on the idea that there is a uniquely privileged notion of substance relevant to the determination of reference, in which case it would seem at best indeterminate what the word `water' refers to. In response to this problem, Gómez-Torrente (2019) has argued that there is a privileged notion of substance that plays a role in the determination of reference, namely, the ordinary notion of substance. This paper argues that Gómez-Torrente's proposal is not successful. Contrary to what Gómez-Torrente supposes, there 1 For Demartini, Eleonora Orlando, for","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GÓMEZ-TORRENTE ON REFERENCE TO ORDINARY SUBSTANCES\",\"authors\":\"Martín Abreu Zavaleta\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n4.mx\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": According to the Kripke-Putnam orthodoxy, a term like 'water' refers to samples of the same substance as the items on the basis of which the term was introduced. However, observations due to Needham (2000) and Leslie (2013) cast doubt on the idea that there is a uniquely privileged notion of substance relevant to the determination of reference, in which case it would seem at best indeterminate what the word `water' refers to. In response to this problem, Gómez-Torrente (2019) has argued that there is a privileged notion of substance that plays a role in the determination of reference, namely, the ordinary notion of substance. This paper argues that Gómez-Torrente's proposal is not successful. Contrary to what Gómez-Torrente supposes, there 1 For Demartini, Eleonora Orlando, for\",\"PeriodicalId\":42903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manuscrito\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manuscrito\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n4.mx\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscrito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n4.mx","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

：根据Kripke Putnam正统观念，像“水”这样的术语指的是与引入该术语所依据的物品相同物质的样品。然而，Needham（2000）和Leslie（2013）的观察结果使人们对这样一种观点产生了怀疑，即存在一个与参考文献的确定相关的独特的特权物质概念，在这种情况下，“水”一词充其量似乎不确定指的是什么，戈麦斯·托伦特（Gómez Torrente，2019）认为，有一种特殊的物质概念在参考的确定中发挥作用，即普通的物质概念。本文认为托伦特的建议并不成功。与Gómez Torrente的假设相反，Demartini、Eleonora Orlando、

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

GÓMEZ-TORRENTE ON REFERENCE TO ORDINARY SUBSTANCES

: According to the Kripke-Putnam orthodoxy, a term like 'water' refers to samples of the same substance as the items on the basis of which the term was introduced. However, observations due to Needham (2000) and Leslie (2013) cast doubt on the idea that there is a uniquely privileged notion of substance relevant to the determination of reference, in which case it would seem at best indeterminate what the word `water' refers to. In response to this problem, Gómez-Torrente (2019) has argued that there is a privileged notion of substance that plays a role in the determination of reference, namely, the ordinary notion of substance. This paper argues that Gómez-Torrente's proposal is not successful. Contrary to what Gómez-Torrente supposes, there 1 For Demartini, Eleonora Orlando, for

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊