比较一系列缺血压迫疗法和肌能技术对上肢交叉综合征患者痛阈和肌张力的影响

Q4 Medicine Rehabilitacja Medyczna Pub Date : 2022-06-11 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.8749
Dawid Janczarzyk, Krzysztof Jamka, E. Mikołajczyk, Bartosz Zając
{"title":"比较一系列缺血压迫疗法和肌能技术对上肢交叉综合征患者痛阈和肌张力的影响","authors":"Dawid Janczarzyk, Krzysztof Jamka, E. Mikołajczyk, Bartosz Zając","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Myofascial pain syndromes and upper crossed syndrome (UCS) are common phenomena observed in society. The main reasons for their formation are postural defects and chronic muscle overload. Trigger points (TP) develop within the affected muscles, generating pain and other symptoms that worsen quality of life. A popular method of therapy is ischaemic compression (IC) of trigger points and muscle energy techniques (MET). However, in literature on the subject, there is a lack information on the effects of a series of therapies with these techniques on the reduction of pain and muscle tension.\n\nAim: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal myofascial technique in the treatment of patients with UCS presenting with pain and excessive tension in the trapezius muscle.\n\nMaterial and methods: In the study, 45 people with UCS with TP in the trapezius back muscle were qualified for the trial. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 equal groups. Group A underwent a series of 5 IC trigger point treatments, while group B received a series of 5 MET treatments. Group C was a control group not subjected to any therapeutic intervention. Changes in pain threshold and muscle resting electrophysiological values after the completion of the 5-week therapy intervention were assessed. The Statistica 13 program was used for statistical analysis of the data.\n\nResults: A significant increase in pain threshold on both sides of the body was demonstrated in groups A and B, but not in group C. Comparison of pain changes between the right and left sides showed no significant differences between groups. There was a significant decrease regarding tension in group C on both sides of the body and its increase in group A on the right side, however, in each case, these values were within the physiological norms.\n\nConclusions: A series of 5 ischaemic compression treatments and muscle energy techniques are effective in reducing pain caused by latent trigger points in people with UCS but are not associated with changes in resting tension beyond physiological norms.\n\n","PeriodicalId":35329,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effects of a Series of Ischaemic Compression Therapy and Muscle Energy Techniques on Pain Threshold and Muscle Tension in People with Upper Crossed Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Dawid Janczarzyk, Krzysztof Jamka, E. Mikołajczyk, Bartosz Zając\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Myofascial pain syndromes and upper crossed syndrome (UCS) are common phenomena observed in society. The main reasons for their formation are postural defects and chronic muscle overload. Trigger points (TP) develop within the affected muscles, generating pain and other symptoms that worsen quality of life. A popular method of therapy is ischaemic compression (IC) of trigger points and muscle energy techniques (MET). However, in literature on the subject, there is a lack information on the effects of a series of therapies with these techniques on the reduction of pain and muscle tension.\\n\\nAim: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal myofascial technique in the treatment of patients with UCS presenting with pain and excessive tension in the trapezius muscle.\\n\\nMaterial and methods: In the study, 45 people with UCS with TP in the trapezius back muscle were qualified for the trial. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 equal groups. Group A underwent a series of 5 IC trigger point treatments, while group B received a series of 5 MET treatments. Group C was a control group not subjected to any therapeutic intervention. Changes in pain threshold and muscle resting electrophysiological values after the completion of the 5-week therapy intervention were assessed. The Statistica 13 program was used for statistical analysis of the data.\\n\\nResults: A significant increase in pain threshold on both sides of the body was demonstrated in groups A and B, but not in group C. Comparison of pain changes between the right and left sides showed no significant differences between groups. There was a significant decrease regarding tension in group C on both sides of the body and its increase in group A on the right side, however, in each case, these values were within the physiological norms.\\n\\nConclusions: A series of 5 ischaemic compression treatments and muscle energy techniques are effective in reducing pain caused by latent trigger points in people with UCS but are not associated with changes in resting tension beyond physiological norms.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitacja Medyczna\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitacja Medyczna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:肌筋膜疼痛综合征和上交叉综合征是社会上常见的现象。它们形成的主要原因是姿势缺陷和慢性肌肉超负荷。触发点(TP)在受影响的肌肉内发展,产生疼痛和其他症状,恶化生活质量。一种流行的治疗方法是触发点的缺血性压迫(IC)和肌肉能量技术(MET)。然而,在有关该主题的文献中,缺乏关于使用这些技术的一系列治疗对减轻疼痛和肌肉紧张的效果的信息。目的:本研究的目的是确定治疗斜方肌疼痛和过度紧张的UCS患者的最佳肌筋膜技术。材料和方法:在本研究中,45名斜方肌背肌TP的UCS患者符合试验条件。受试者被随机分为3组。A组接受了一系列5个IC触发点治疗,而B组接受了系列5个MET治疗。C组是未进行任何治疗干预的对照组。评估5周治疗干预完成后疼痛阈值和肌肉静息电生理值的变化。Statistica 13程序用于数据的统计分析。结果:A组和B组身体两侧的疼痛阈值显著增加,但C组没有。比较左右两侧的疼痛变化,两组之间没有显著差异。在C组中,身体两侧的张力显著降低,在a组中,右侧的张力增加,然而,在每种情况下,这些值都在生理规范范围内。结论:一系列5种缺血性压迫治疗和肌肉能量技术可以有效减轻UCS患者潜在触发点引起的疼痛,但与超过生理规范的静息张力变化无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the Effects of a Series of Ischaemic Compression Therapy and Muscle Energy Techniques on Pain Threshold and Muscle Tension in People with Upper Crossed Syndrome
Introduction: Myofascial pain syndromes and upper crossed syndrome (UCS) are common phenomena observed in society. The main reasons for their formation are postural defects and chronic muscle overload. Trigger points (TP) develop within the affected muscles, generating pain and other symptoms that worsen quality of life. A popular method of therapy is ischaemic compression (IC) of trigger points and muscle energy techniques (MET). However, in literature on the subject, there is a lack information on the effects of a series of therapies with these techniques on the reduction of pain and muscle tension. Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal myofascial technique in the treatment of patients with UCS presenting with pain and excessive tension in the trapezius muscle. Material and methods: In the study, 45 people with UCS with TP in the trapezius back muscle were qualified for the trial. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 equal groups. Group A underwent a series of 5 IC trigger point treatments, while group B received a series of 5 MET treatments. Group C was a control group not subjected to any therapeutic intervention. Changes in pain threshold and muscle resting electrophysiological values after the completion of the 5-week therapy intervention were assessed. The Statistica 13 program was used for statistical analysis of the data. Results: A significant increase in pain threshold on both sides of the body was demonstrated in groups A and B, but not in group C. Comparison of pain changes between the right and left sides showed no significant differences between groups. There was a significant decrease regarding tension in group C on both sides of the body and its increase in group A on the right side, however, in each case, these values were within the physiological norms. Conclusions: A series of 5 ischaemic compression treatments and muscle energy techniques are effective in reducing pain caused by latent trigger points in people with UCS but are not associated with changes in resting tension beyond physiological norms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitacja Medyczna
Rehabilitacja Medyczna Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rheological Properties of Blood in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated with Local Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Preliminary Report Functional Patterns and Postural Balance in Young Women With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain and Healthy Individuals Comparing Influence of Thermal Effects in Experimental Models - Thermotherapy in Medical Rehabilitation Development and Reliability of Parents' Body Posture Literacy Questionnaire (PBPLQ) Effect of Selected Kinesiology Taping Applications on Reducing Pain and Accelerating Rehabilitation in Children with Osgood-Schlatter Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1