中心性肥胖的不同人体测量指标可以预测老年人高血压

V. S. Novaes, R. S. Passos, Í. Ribeiro, I. V. Freire, L. Schettino, C. Araújo, C. A. Casotti, R. Pereira
{"title":"中心性肥胖的不同人体测量指标可以预测老年人高血压","authors":"V. S. Novaes, R. S. Passos, Í. Ribeiro, I. V. Freire, L. Schettino, C. Araújo, C. A. Casotti, R. Pereira","doi":"10.15446/av.enferm.v37n3.77165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to investigate the association between hypertension and anthropometric indicators of central obesity, obtained from two anatomical sites in older adults.Methodology: cross-sectional study that involved 145 older adults, from whom socioeconomic and demographic data and anthropometric indicators of central obesity (waist circumference [CC] and abdominal circumference [CA]) were obtained, which were considered independent variables. A logistic regression model was used to analyze associations and for the discriminatory power of the cut-off points of the hypertension anthropometric indicators, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed. Comparisons were made between ROC curves, with the aim of identifying significant differences in the discriminatory power of the anthropometric indicators studied.Results: out of the 145 individuals, 79 were females (54%) and 66 males (46%). Results showed a high prevalence of arterial hypertension in men (69,7%) and women (73,4%). Both CC and CA were significantly associated with hypertension in both genders. Parameters of the ROC curve revealed that both anthropometric indicators of central obesity exhibit good discriminatory power for hypertension in the studied population. The cut-off point for CC was > 83,2 cm for men and > 82,6 cm for women; while for CA it was > 85,1 cm and > 85,4 cm for men and women, respectively.Conclusion: CA and CC are significantly associated with hypertension in both genders, and there is no superiority between them to predict hypertension in the elderly population.","PeriodicalId":30347,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Enfermeria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15446/av.enferm.v37n3.77165","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different anthropometric indicators of central obesity can predict hypertension in older adults\",\"authors\":\"V. S. Novaes, R. S. Passos, Í. Ribeiro, I. V. Freire, L. Schettino, C. Araújo, C. A. Casotti, R. Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.15446/av.enferm.v37n3.77165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: to investigate the association between hypertension and anthropometric indicators of central obesity, obtained from two anatomical sites in older adults.Methodology: cross-sectional study that involved 145 older adults, from whom socioeconomic and demographic data and anthropometric indicators of central obesity (waist circumference [CC] and abdominal circumference [CA]) were obtained, which were considered independent variables. A logistic regression model was used to analyze associations and for the discriminatory power of the cut-off points of the hypertension anthropometric indicators, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed. Comparisons were made between ROC curves, with the aim of identifying significant differences in the discriminatory power of the anthropometric indicators studied.Results: out of the 145 individuals, 79 were females (54%) and 66 males (46%). Results showed a high prevalence of arterial hypertension in men (69,7%) and women (73,4%). Both CC and CA were significantly associated with hypertension in both genders. Parameters of the ROC curve revealed that both anthropometric indicators of central obesity exhibit good discriminatory power for hypertension in the studied population. The cut-off point for CC was > 83,2 cm for men and > 82,6 cm for women; while for CA it was > 85,1 cm and > 85,4 cm for men and women, respectively.Conclusion: CA and CC are significantly associated with hypertension in both genders, and there is no superiority between them to predict hypertension in the elderly population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avances en Enfermeria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15446/av.enferm.v37n3.77165\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avances en Enfermeria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v37n3.77165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v37n3.77165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨高血压与中枢性肥胖的人体测量指标之间的关系,这些指标来自老年人的两个解剖部位。方法:横断面研究纳入145名老年人,从中获得社会经济和人口统计学数据以及中心性肥胖的人体测量指标(腰围[CC]和腹围[CA]),这些指标被认为是独立变量。采用logistic回归模型分析相关性,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析高血压人体测量指标截断点的区分力。在ROC曲线之间进行比较,目的是确定所研究的人体测量指标的区分能力的显着差异。结果:145只个体中,雌性79只(54%),雄性66只(46%)。结果显示,男性(69.7%)和女性(73.4%)的高血压患病率较高。无论男女,CC和CA均与高血压显著相关。ROC曲线参数显示,中心性肥胖的两项人体测量指标在研究人群中对高血压具有良好的鉴别能力。男性和女性CC的分界点分别为bb1083.2 cm和bb1086.2 cm;而男性和女性的平均身高分别为1.85万厘米和1.85万厘米。结论:CA和CC在男女人群中均与高血压有显著相关性,两者在预测老年人群高血压方面没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Different anthropometric indicators of central obesity can predict hypertension in older adults
Objective: to investigate the association between hypertension and anthropometric indicators of central obesity, obtained from two anatomical sites in older adults.Methodology: cross-sectional study that involved 145 older adults, from whom socioeconomic and demographic data and anthropometric indicators of central obesity (waist circumference [CC] and abdominal circumference [CA]) were obtained, which were considered independent variables. A logistic regression model was used to analyze associations and for the discriminatory power of the cut-off points of the hypertension anthropometric indicators, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed. Comparisons were made between ROC curves, with the aim of identifying significant differences in the discriminatory power of the anthropometric indicators studied.Results: out of the 145 individuals, 79 were females (54%) and 66 males (46%). Results showed a high prevalence of arterial hypertension in men (69,7%) and women (73,4%). Both CC and CA were significantly associated with hypertension in both genders. Parameters of the ROC curve revealed that both anthropometric indicators of central obesity exhibit good discriminatory power for hypertension in the studied population. The cut-off point for CC was > 83,2 cm for men and > 82,6 cm for women; while for CA it was > 85,1 cm and > 85,4 cm for men and women, respectively.Conclusion: CA and CC are significantly associated with hypertension in both genders, and there is no superiority between them to predict hypertension in the elderly population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vitimização por bullying e senso de comunidade escolar: prevalência e fatores associados Validez y confiabilidad del instrumento Adopción del rol de cuidador con uso de medicamentos Propiedades psicométricas del Índice de Bienestar General en mujeres gestantes colombianas Manejo da hipertensão gestacional no pré-natal: validação de cenário para a simulação clínica Cuidando la sexualidad desde lo comunicacional: teoría fundamentada constructivista
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1