宗教教育中的国际知识转移

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2021.2006539
Kristian Niemi
{"title":"宗教教育中的国际知识转移","authors":"Kristian Niemi","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2021.2006539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the spring of 2019, a manifesto for discussion was published on international knowledge transfer [IKT] in religious education. It was the result of a meeting between scholars in the field of religious education [RE]. According to the authors, although international knowledge transfer is an ideal in all fields of knowledge, it is not clear that the field of religious education is an integrated field of research which produces common, cumulative knowledge. There seems, they argue, to be a general presumption that research results concerning religious education from one country would either not be of interest or importance, or that said results would not be transferable due to context-dependency. Through the Manifesto, the authors want to address the issue; they offer suggestions of what could be done, how, and invite colleagues “from the field of religious education (and beyond)” to contribute. It is not clear from the Manifesto nor the description of its background why the particular format of a “Manifesto” was chosen, instead of a research article or some such. Perhaps it enabled the text to be spread more readily—as it was, in various national channels for research on religious education. It was later published verbatim in the journal of Religious Education, and was followed up by an article where some matters are elaborated further; background, the question of validity, as well as a suggestion for typology of shared knowledge for the field of religious education. This has sparked some academic replies, as well as the main topic of this text: International Knowledge Transfer in Religious Education. The editors claim that it is “the first book on international knowledge transfer in religious education in the history of this discipline”. It should be said that there have been numerous international publications on religious education; the REDCo project comes to mind, as well as titles on religious education in various countries, such as REL-EDU, The Routledge international handbook of religious education, Religious education in the European context; and methodologies developed for the specific purpose of discussing and analyzing religious education from an international perspective. Many more titles could be mentioned; indeed, some are, in the chapters of the book. However, the editors do seem to have a point; no book has previously been published on the specific topic of international knowledge transfer of religious education.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review: International Knowledge Transfer in Religious Education\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Niemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2021.2006539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the spring of 2019, a manifesto for discussion was published on international knowledge transfer [IKT] in religious education. It was the result of a meeting between scholars in the field of religious education [RE]. According to the authors, although international knowledge transfer is an ideal in all fields of knowledge, it is not clear that the field of religious education is an integrated field of research which produces common, cumulative knowledge. There seems, they argue, to be a general presumption that research results concerning religious education from one country would either not be of interest or importance, or that said results would not be transferable due to context-dependency. Through the Manifesto, the authors want to address the issue; they offer suggestions of what could be done, how, and invite colleagues “from the field of religious education (and beyond)” to contribute. It is not clear from the Manifesto nor the description of its background why the particular format of a “Manifesto” was chosen, instead of a research article or some such. Perhaps it enabled the text to be spread more readily—as it was, in various national channels for research on religious education. It was later published verbatim in the journal of Religious Education, and was followed up by an article where some matters are elaborated further; background, the question of validity, as well as a suggestion for typology of shared knowledge for the field of religious education. This has sparked some academic replies, as well as the main topic of this text: International Knowledge Transfer in Religious Education. The editors claim that it is “the first book on international knowledge transfer in religious education in the history of this discipline”. It should be said that there have been numerous international publications on religious education; the REDCo project comes to mind, as well as titles on religious education in various countries, such as REL-EDU, The Routledge international handbook of religious education, Religious education in the European context; and methodologies developed for the specific purpose of discussing and analyzing religious education from an international perspective. Many more titles could be mentioned; indeed, some are, in the chapters of the book. However, the editors do seem to have a point; no book has previously been published on the specific topic of international knowledge transfer of religious education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.2006539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.2006539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年春季,一份关于宗教教育中的国际知识转移(IKT)的讨论宣言发表。这是宗教教育领域学者之间一次会议的结果。作者认为,虽然国际知识转移在所有知识领域都是一种理想,但宗教教育领域是不是一个产生共同、累积知识的综合研究领域尚不清楚。他们认为,似乎有一种普遍的假设,即来自一个国家的有关宗教教育的研究结果要么不有趣,要么不重要,要么由于环境依赖,所述结果无法转移。通过《宣言》,作者想要解决这个问题;他们提出了可以做什么、如何做的建议,并邀请“来自宗教教育(及其他领域)”的同事做出贡献。从《宣言》和对其背景的描述中都不清楚为什么选择了“宣言”的特定格式,而不是一篇研究文章或诸如此类的文章。也许它使文本更容易传播——就像它在各种国家宗教教育研究渠道中传播一样。它后来逐字逐句地发表在《宗教教育》杂志上,随后又有一篇文章进一步阐述了一些问题;背景、有效性问题,以及对宗教教育领域共享知识类型学的建议。这引发了一些学术界的回应,以及本文的主题:宗教教育中的国际知识转移。编辑们声称,这是“这门学科历史上第一本关于宗教教育国际知识转移的书”。应该说,有许多关于宗教教育的国际出版物;想到REDCo项目,以及各国宗教教育的标题,如REL-EDU,劳特利奇国际宗教教育手册,欧洲背景下的宗教教育;以及从国际视角讨论和分析宗教教育的具体目的而开发的方法。我们还可以提到更多游戏;的确,在书的章节中有一些。然而,编辑们似乎是有道理的;以前没有出版过关于宗教教育的国际知识转移这一具体主题的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review: International Knowledge Transfer in Religious Education
In the spring of 2019, a manifesto for discussion was published on international knowledge transfer [IKT] in religious education. It was the result of a meeting between scholars in the field of religious education [RE]. According to the authors, although international knowledge transfer is an ideal in all fields of knowledge, it is not clear that the field of religious education is an integrated field of research which produces common, cumulative knowledge. There seems, they argue, to be a general presumption that research results concerning religious education from one country would either not be of interest or importance, or that said results would not be transferable due to context-dependency. Through the Manifesto, the authors want to address the issue; they offer suggestions of what could be done, how, and invite colleagues “from the field of religious education (and beyond)” to contribute. It is not clear from the Manifesto nor the description of its background why the particular format of a “Manifesto” was chosen, instead of a research article or some such. Perhaps it enabled the text to be spread more readily—as it was, in various national channels for research on religious education. It was later published verbatim in the journal of Religious Education, and was followed up by an article where some matters are elaborated further; background, the question of validity, as well as a suggestion for typology of shared knowledge for the field of religious education. This has sparked some academic replies, as well as the main topic of this text: International Knowledge Transfer in Religious Education. The editors claim that it is “the first book on international knowledge transfer in religious education in the history of this discipline”. It should be said that there have been numerous international publications on religious education; the REDCo project comes to mind, as well as titles on religious education in various countries, such as REL-EDU, The Routledge international handbook of religious education, Religious education in the European context; and methodologies developed for the specific purpose of discussing and analyzing religious education from an international perspective. Many more titles could be mentioned; indeed, some are, in the chapters of the book. However, the editors do seem to have a point; no book has previously been published on the specific topic of international knowledge transfer of religious education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1