护理

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS CRITICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1111/criq.12727
Holly Yanacek
{"title":"护理","authors":"Holly Yanacek","doi":"10.1111/criq.12727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With global shortages of health-care workers, child care, eldercare and care for people with disabilities, news outlets around the world have reported a <i>care crisis</i> worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. In <i>The Care Manifesto</i> (Verso Books, 2020), the authors observe, ‘Rhetorically at least, governments worldwide have responded [to the pandemic], and in sharp contrast to 2019, <i>talk</i> of care is currently everywhere’ (p.7). A glimpse into <i>care</i>'s long history adds what Raymond Williams described as ‘just that extra edge of consciousness’ (<i>Keywords</i>, 1976) to understand the implications of <i>care</i> in contemporary English usage. The word's complexity arises not only from its status as a noun and a verb but also from its ability to describe, variously, an action, a feeling, supervision, paid or unpaid labour and the object of care itself, as well as from the word's strong association with conflicting ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ emotions.</p><p>The word <i>care</i> is inherited from Germanic and first attested before the eleventh century in its noun and verb forms. <i>Care</i> the noun derives from Old English <i>caru</i>, <i>cearu</i>, and the verb derives from Old English <i>carian</i>. <i>OED</i> includes quotations from <i>Beowulf</i> (c. 975–1025) documenting some of the earliest uses in the entries for both the noun <i>care</i> (‘Cearu wæs geniwod, geworden in wicun’ [sorrow was renewed, it had come to the dwellings]) and for the verb (‘na ymb his lif cearað’ [he never cared about his life]). <i>OED</i> sense 1 of the noun <i>care</i> denotes ‘Mental suffering, sorrow, grief, trouble’ and ‘Utterance of sorrow; lamentation, mourning’ and is now obsolete. <i>OED</i> sense 2b of the entry <i>to care</i> remains an active sense of the word today: ‘To feel concern (great or little), be concerned, trouble oneself, feel interest. Also in colloquial phrases expressing or implying lack of interest or concern: for all I care, see if I care, who cares?’</p><p>Beginning in the thirteenth century, <i>to care for</i> described an other-directed action or provision: ‘to take thought for, provide for, look after, take care of’. Still active today, this sense of the verb <i>to care</i> applies in many contexts, including parenting, <i>eldercare</i>, pet keeping, farming, and <i>health care. OED</i> sense 5 of <i>to care</i>, the most recent sense of the verb, indicates the addition of an affective meaning. This sense of <i>to care</i> denoting ‘To have regard, fondness, or attachment for’ dates back to the sixteenth century and could be used to describe one's feelings about a person or a thing. The most common collocation used when this affective sense of <i>care</i> is meant is <i>to care <b>about</b></i>, whereas <i>to care <b>for</b></i> typically describes an action, i.e. hands-on caregiving. While the <i>OED</i> notes that the verb was originally used only in negative constructions (e.g. he never cared to; they cared for nothing; I care not), affirmative constructions are common in contemporary English usage.</p><p>Although the earliest sense of the noun <i>care</i> denoting sorrow or grief is obsolete, this association of <i>care</i> with ‘negative’ emotions and mental suffering is palpable in two senses of the word that are still active. <i>OED</i> sense 2 of <i>care</i> denotes ‘Burdened state of mind arising from fear, doubt, or concern about anything; solicitude, anxiety, mental perturbation’, and sense 3a defines <i>care</i> as ‘Serious or grave mental attention; the charging of the mind with anything; concern; heed, heedfulness, attention, regard; caution, pains’. These two senses of <i>care</i> highlight possible negative perceptions of <i>caregiving</i> as a burden and emphasize the potential physical, mental, and emotional impacts on <i>carers</i>. Other senses of the noun <i>care</i> still active today include the meaning ‘Charge; oversight with a view to protection, preservation, or guidance’ (<i>OED</i> sense 4a) and the related phrase <i>to take care of</i> (<i>OED</i> sense 4b), which can mean not only ‘to look after, provide for’ but, interestingly, also ‘to deal with, dispose of’. From the late sixteenth century, in addition to the meanings of <i>care</i> as a state of mind, action, and oversight, <i>care</i> also denotes the object of care or concern itself and is often used in the plural, as in the idioms ‘not a care in the world’ and ‘to have all the cares of the world on one's shoulders’.</p><p>Although the adjectival form <i>careless</i> originally meant ‘Free from care, anxiety, or apprehension’, this sense of the word became archaic from the seventeenth century, and this meaning is now attributed to the more positively connoted adjective, <i>carefree</i>, while <i>careless</i> suggests ‘having no care about’ or ‘inattentive, negligent, thoughtless’. The sense of the adjective <i>careful</i> ‘Full of grief; mournful; sorrowful’ is now obsolete, and this antonym of <i>careless</i> commonly suggests ‘circumspect, watchful, cautious’ and full of care or <i>concern</i> for someone or something or applying care or <i>attention</i> to one's work.</p><p>As this concise outline of the word's semantic development illustrates, <i>care</i>, with its noun and verb forms, has had multiple competing strands of meaning over the course of its long history, and the word has become more challenging in contemporary English usage. Both noun and verb forms of the word <i>care</i> show a high relative frequency, with the noun being more frequently used than the verb (100–1000 times vs. 10–100 times per million words) in typical modern English usage according to the <i>OED</i>. The wide range of collocations and modifiers of <i>care</i> explains the higher relative frequency of the noun. Some of the most common collocations consisting of modifiers preceding <i>care</i> include <i>health care, child care, foster care, intensive care, primary care</i>, and <i>medical care</i>. In these collocations, <i>care</i> refers to either paid or unpaid work provided by individuals (e.g. doctors, nurses, care assistants, parents, or other family members) or an institution to meet the physical, material, mental, social, and/or emotional needs of the receivers of care. Among the most commonly used verb collocations are <i>take care</i>, <i>provide care</i>, and <i>receive care</i>, which reflect the transactional and relational nature of <i>care</i>. Frequent collocations consisting of words that follow <i>care</i> include the near-synonyms <i>caregiver, caretaker</i>, and <i>care provider</i>, in addition to <i>care home, care pathway, care work</i>, and <i>care package</i>.</p><p>The <i>OED</i> entry for the noun <i>care</i> features a number of draft additions from 2001 that comment on specific collocations mentioned above. In medical contexts, <i>care</i> is often synonymous with <i>treatment</i> given to a patient by a health worker, as suggested by the term <i>care pathway</i>, defined as the optimal sequence of steps in the diagnosis of a particular disorder and the plan of treatment for an individual. Care provided by health workers may be considered <i>care work</i>, but this subtype of work also includes <i>child care</i>, teaching, <i>eldercare</i>, and domestic work done in the service of others. Care work may be compensated in the case of teaching and health care, but as scholars in fields such as feminist economics, gender studies, and sociology have long recognized, <i>care work</i> often describes unpaid labour that is deeply necessary but undervalued and disproportionately performed by women, ethnic minorities, immigrants, and the poor. The British expression <i>care in the community</i> describes medical or social care for people with disabilities or individuals living with a mental health issue within a community or by relatives instead of in hospitals or other institutions as a result of a governmental policy aiming to reduce institutional provision of long-term care.</p><p>A similar shift away from provisions of care through social welfare or public assistance programmes and toward ideas of self-sufficiency and individualized <i>responsibility</i> for health and <i>well-being</i> is evident in current use of the word <i>self-care</i>. According to the <i>OED</i>, the term was first attested in the mid-sixteenth century and denoted ‘Concern or regard for oneself; self-interested behavior’ but in the mid-nineteenth century expanded to mean ‘The activity of taking care of one's own health, appearance, or well-being’, the sense commonly used today. Caring for oneself is undoubtedly important, and yet recent <i>self-care rhetoric</i> has rendered the term nearly meaningless, with companies, social media posts, and articles labelling almost everything from lighting a candle to applying a spa face mask <i>#selfcare</i>. This commodified, neoliberal version of <i>self-care</i> is a far cry from what writer and civil rights activist Audre Lorde envisioned when she wrote the following in <i>A Burst of Light</i> (1988): ‘Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare’ (p.131). The <i>self-care industry</i> has capitalized on the neoliberal shift of responsibility for well-being to individuals, and sales of self-care consumer goods have boomed in the absence of affordable and equitable access to medical and mental health care.</p><p>Care is a basic need essential for the survival of humans, other animals, and plants alike. Without it, societies would cease to function. Yet care is not provided equitably—it remains highly gendered in both the workplace and the home, with women accounting for 70% of the global health and social care workforce (World Health Organization). Early negative connotations of the noun and verb <i>care</i> still echo in words such <i>as careworn, caregiving, care work</i>, and <i>caregiver burnout</i>, implying that care is exhausting or even a burden. This fear that caregiving responsibilities could reduce work productivity or one's ability to compete is amplified by the ideal neoliberal vision of ‘every person for themselves’. Thus, even if <i>talk</i> of care and claims to value it are currently heard everywhere, the continued devaluation and marginalization of care work, of caregivers, and of the people most in need of care tells a different story.</p><p>See <span>access, emotion, empathy, responsibility, well-being</span></p>","PeriodicalId":44341,"journal":{"name":"CRITICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"65 3","pages":"51-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/criq.12727","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care\",\"authors\":\"Holly Yanacek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/criq.12727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>With global shortages of health-care workers, child care, eldercare and care for people with disabilities, news outlets around the world have reported a <i>care crisis</i> worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. In <i>The Care Manifesto</i> (Verso Books, 2020), the authors observe, ‘Rhetorically at least, governments worldwide have responded [to the pandemic], and in sharp contrast to 2019, <i>talk</i> of care is currently everywhere’ (p.7). A glimpse into <i>care</i>'s long history adds what Raymond Williams described as ‘just that extra edge of consciousness’ (<i>Keywords</i>, 1976) to understand the implications of <i>care</i> in contemporary English usage. The word's complexity arises not only from its status as a noun and a verb but also from its ability to describe, variously, an action, a feeling, supervision, paid or unpaid labour and the object of care itself, as well as from the word's strong association with conflicting ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ emotions.</p><p>The word <i>care</i> is inherited from Germanic and first attested before the eleventh century in its noun and verb forms. <i>Care</i> the noun derives from Old English <i>caru</i>, <i>cearu</i>, and the verb derives from Old English <i>carian</i>. <i>OED</i> includes quotations from <i>Beowulf</i> (c. 975–1025) documenting some of the earliest uses in the entries for both the noun <i>care</i> (‘Cearu wæs geniwod, geworden in wicun’ [sorrow was renewed, it had come to the dwellings]) and for the verb (‘na ymb his lif cearað’ [he never cared about his life]). <i>OED</i> sense 1 of the noun <i>care</i> denotes ‘Mental suffering, sorrow, grief, trouble’ and ‘Utterance of sorrow; lamentation, mourning’ and is now obsolete. <i>OED</i> sense 2b of the entry <i>to care</i> remains an active sense of the word today: ‘To feel concern (great or little), be concerned, trouble oneself, feel interest. Also in colloquial phrases expressing or implying lack of interest or concern: for all I care, see if I care, who cares?’</p><p>Beginning in the thirteenth century, <i>to care for</i> described an other-directed action or provision: ‘to take thought for, provide for, look after, take care of’. Still active today, this sense of the verb <i>to care</i> applies in many contexts, including parenting, <i>eldercare</i>, pet keeping, farming, and <i>health care. OED</i> sense 5 of <i>to care</i>, the most recent sense of the verb, indicates the addition of an affective meaning. This sense of <i>to care</i> denoting ‘To have regard, fondness, or attachment for’ dates back to the sixteenth century and could be used to describe one's feelings about a person or a thing. The most common collocation used when this affective sense of <i>care</i> is meant is <i>to care <b>about</b></i>, whereas <i>to care <b>for</b></i> typically describes an action, i.e. hands-on caregiving. While the <i>OED</i> notes that the verb was originally used only in negative constructions (e.g. he never cared to; they cared for nothing; I care not), affirmative constructions are common in contemporary English usage.</p><p>Although the earliest sense of the noun <i>care</i> denoting sorrow or grief is obsolete, this association of <i>care</i> with ‘negative’ emotions and mental suffering is palpable in two senses of the word that are still active. <i>OED</i> sense 2 of <i>care</i> denotes ‘Burdened state of mind arising from fear, doubt, or concern about anything; solicitude, anxiety, mental perturbation’, and sense 3a defines <i>care</i> as ‘Serious or grave mental attention; the charging of the mind with anything; concern; heed, heedfulness, attention, regard; caution, pains’. These two senses of <i>care</i> highlight possible negative perceptions of <i>caregiving</i> as a burden and emphasize the potential physical, mental, and emotional impacts on <i>carers</i>. Other senses of the noun <i>care</i> still active today include the meaning ‘Charge; oversight with a view to protection, preservation, or guidance’ (<i>OED</i> sense 4a) and the related phrase <i>to take care of</i> (<i>OED</i> sense 4b), which can mean not only ‘to look after, provide for’ but, interestingly, also ‘to deal with, dispose of’. From the late sixteenth century, in addition to the meanings of <i>care</i> as a state of mind, action, and oversight, <i>care</i> also denotes the object of care or concern itself and is often used in the plural, as in the idioms ‘not a care in the world’ and ‘to have all the cares of the world on one's shoulders’.</p><p>Although the adjectival form <i>careless</i> originally meant ‘Free from care, anxiety, or apprehension’, this sense of the word became archaic from the seventeenth century, and this meaning is now attributed to the more positively connoted adjective, <i>carefree</i>, while <i>careless</i> suggests ‘having no care about’ or ‘inattentive, negligent, thoughtless’. The sense of the adjective <i>careful</i> ‘Full of grief; mournful; sorrowful’ is now obsolete, and this antonym of <i>careless</i> commonly suggests ‘circumspect, watchful, cautious’ and full of care or <i>concern</i> for someone or something or applying care or <i>attention</i> to one's work.</p><p>As this concise outline of the word's semantic development illustrates, <i>care</i>, with its noun and verb forms, has had multiple competing strands of meaning over the course of its long history, and the word has become more challenging in contemporary English usage. Both noun and verb forms of the word <i>care</i> show a high relative frequency, with the noun being more frequently used than the verb (100–1000 times vs. 10–100 times per million words) in typical modern English usage according to the <i>OED</i>. The wide range of collocations and modifiers of <i>care</i> explains the higher relative frequency of the noun. Some of the most common collocations consisting of modifiers preceding <i>care</i> include <i>health care, child care, foster care, intensive care, primary care</i>, and <i>medical care</i>. In these collocations, <i>care</i> refers to either paid or unpaid work provided by individuals (e.g. doctors, nurses, care assistants, parents, or other family members) or an institution to meet the physical, material, mental, social, and/or emotional needs of the receivers of care. Among the most commonly used verb collocations are <i>take care</i>, <i>provide care</i>, and <i>receive care</i>, which reflect the transactional and relational nature of <i>care</i>. Frequent collocations consisting of words that follow <i>care</i> include the near-synonyms <i>caregiver, caretaker</i>, and <i>care provider</i>, in addition to <i>care home, care pathway, care work</i>, and <i>care package</i>.</p><p>The <i>OED</i> entry for the noun <i>care</i> features a number of draft additions from 2001 that comment on specific collocations mentioned above. In medical contexts, <i>care</i> is often synonymous with <i>treatment</i> given to a patient by a health worker, as suggested by the term <i>care pathway</i>, defined as the optimal sequence of steps in the diagnosis of a particular disorder and the plan of treatment for an individual. Care provided by health workers may be considered <i>care work</i>, but this subtype of work also includes <i>child care</i>, teaching, <i>eldercare</i>, and domestic work done in the service of others. Care work may be compensated in the case of teaching and health care, but as scholars in fields such as feminist economics, gender studies, and sociology have long recognized, <i>care work</i> often describes unpaid labour that is deeply necessary but undervalued and disproportionately performed by women, ethnic minorities, immigrants, and the poor. The British expression <i>care in the community</i> describes medical or social care for people with disabilities or individuals living with a mental health issue within a community or by relatives instead of in hospitals or other institutions as a result of a governmental policy aiming to reduce institutional provision of long-term care.</p><p>A similar shift away from provisions of care through social welfare or public assistance programmes and toward ideas of self-sufficiency and individualized <i>responsibility</i> for health and <i>well-being</i> is evident in current use of the word <i>self-care</i>. According to the <i>OED</i>, the term was first attested in the mid-sixteenth century and denoted ‘Concern or regard for oneself; self-interested behavior’ but in the mid-nineteenth century expanded to mean ‘The activity of taking care of one's own health, appearance, or well-being’, the sense commonly used today. Caring for oneself is undoubtedly important, and yet recent <i>self-care rhetoric</i> has rendered the term nearly meaningless, with companies, social media posts, and articles labelling almost everything from lighting a candle to applying a spa face mask <i>#selfcare</i>. This commodified, neoliberal version of <i>self-care</i> is a far cry from what writer and civil rights activist Audre Lorde envisioned when she wrote the following in <i>A Burst of Light</i> (1988): ‘Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare’ (p.131). The <i>self-care industry</i> has capitalized on the neoliberal shift of responsibility for well-being to individuals, and sales of self-care consumer goods have boomed in the absence of affordable and equitable access to medical and mental health care.</p><p>Care is a basic need essential for the survival of humans, other animals, and plants alike. Without it, societies would cease to function. Yet care is not provided equitably—it remains highly gendered in both the workplace and the home, with women accounting for 70% of the global health and social care workforce (World Health Organization). Early negative connotations of the noun and verb <i>care</i> still echo in words such <i>as careworn, caregiving, care work</i>, and <i>caregiver burnout</i>, implying that care is exhausting or even a burden. This fear that caregiving responsibilities could reduce work productivity or one's ability to compete is amplified by the ideal neoliberal vision of ‘every person for themselves’. Thus, even if <i>talk</i> of care and claims to value it are currently heard everywhere, the continued devaluation and marginalization of care work, of caregivers, and of the people most in need of care tells a different story.</p><p>See <span>access, emotion, empathy, responsibility, well-being</span></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"51-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/criq.12727\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/criq.12727\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY REVIEWS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/criq.12727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于全球卫生保健工作者、儿童保育、老年人护理和残疾人护理短缺,世界各地的新闻媒体都报道了COVID-19大流行加剧的护理危机。在《关怀宣言》(Verso Books, 2020年)中,作者观察到,“至少在口头上,世界各国政府已经(对疫情)做出了回应,与2019年形成鲜明对比的是,目前到处都在谈论关怀”(第7页)。对care的悠久历史的一瞥增加了Raymond Williams所描述的“只是意识的额外边缘”(关键词,1976),以理解care在当代英语用法中的含义。这个词的复杂性不仅来自于它作为名词和动词的地位,还来自于它描述各种行为、感觉、监督、有偿或无偿劳动以及护理对象本身的能力,以及这个词与相互冲突的“积极”和“消极”情绪的强烈联系。care这个词继承自日耳曼语,在11世纪之前,它的名词和动词形式首次得到证实。名词Care来源于古英语caru, cearu,动词Care来源于古英语carian。《牛津英语词典》收录了《贝奥武夫》(Beowulf,约975-1025年)的引语,记录了这些词条中名词care的一些最早用法(' Cearu wæs geniwood, geworden in wicun '[悲伤重新出现,它已经来到住所])和动词care的用法(' na ymb his life cearað '[他从不关心自己的生活])。名词care在OED中的释义1表示“精神上的痛苦、悲伤、悲伤、麻烦”和“悲伤的表达;“哀号,哀悼”,现在已经过时了。《牛津英语词典》中care一词的释义2b至今仍保留着这个词的活跃意义:“感到关心(或大或小)、关心、烦恼、感兴趣。”也用于表达或暗示缺乏兴趣或关心的口语化短语:尽管我关心,看看我是否关心,谁关心?从13世纪开始,to care for用于描述他人指导的行动或提供:“考虑、提供、照顾、照顾”。直到今天,care这个动词的意思仍然很活跃,在很多情况下都有应用,包括养育子女、照顾老人、养宠物、务农和医疗保健。《牛津英语词典》中to care的词义5是该动词的最新词义,表示添加了情感意义。care意为“关注、喜爱或依恋”,可以追溯到16世纪,可以用来描述一个人对一个人或一件事的感觉。当这种情感关怀的意思是关心时,最常用的搭配是关心,而关心通常描述的是一种行动,即动手照顾。而《牛津英语词典》指出,这个动词最初只用于否定结构中(例如,他从未关心过;他们什么也不在乎;我不在乎),肯定结构在当代英语中很常见。尽管care这个名词最早表示悲伤或悲伤的意思已经过时了,但这种与“消极”情绪和精神痛苦的联系在这个词的两种意义上仍然很明显。care的释义2表示“因害怕、怀疑或担心某事而产生的精神负担状态”;忧虑、焦虑、精神不安”,释义3a将护理定义为“严重或严重的精神关注;思想被任何事物所控制;关注;留心,谨慎,注意,关注;谨慎,痛苦”。这两种护理意识强调了将护理视为一种负担的可能的负面看法,并强调了对护理者潜在的身体、精神和情感影响。名词care的其他含义至今仍很活跃,包括“冲锋”的意思;以保护、保存或指导为目的的监督”(OED释义4a)和相关短语“take care of”(OED释义4b),这不仅意味着“照顾、提供”,有趣的是,它还意味着“处理、处置”。从16世纪后期开始,care除了作为一种精神状态、行动和监督的意思外,还表示关心的对象或关心的本身,并且经常以复数形式使用,如习语“世界上没有牵挂”和“把世界上所有的牵挂都放在自己的肩膀上”。尽管形容词形式careless最初的意思是“无忧无虑、焦虑或忧虑”,但这个词的意思从17世纪开始就变得古老了,现在这个意思被归为更积极的形容词,无忧无虑,而careless表示“不关心”或“不注意、疏忽、粗心”。形容词的意思是“充满悲伤的;悲哀的;“sorrow”现在已经过时了,这个“careless”的反义词通常表示“谨慎的,警惕的,谨慎的”,对某人或某事充满关心或关心,或者对某人的工作非常关心或关注。 正如这个词的语义发展的简明大纲所说明的那样,care这个词的名词和动词形式在其漫长的历史过程中有多种相互竞争的意思,这个词在当代英语的用法中变得更具挑战性。care的名词和动词形式都显示出较高的相对频率,根据《牛津英语词典》,在典型的现代英语用法中,名词形式的使用频率比动词形式的使用频率要高(100-1000次对10-100次)。广泛的搭配和care修饰语解释了名词较高的相对频率。一些最常见的由护理前修饰语组成的搭配包括卫生保健、儿童护理、寄养、重症监护、初级保健和医疗保健。在这些搭配中,护理是指由个人(如医生、护士、护理助理、父母或其他家庭成员)或机构提供的有偿或无偿工作,以满足护理接受者的身体、物质、精神、社会和/或情感需求。最常用的动词搭配是take care,提供care和receive care,这反映了care的事务性和关系性。与care相关的单词经常被搭配在一起,包括近义词caregiver、caretaker和care provider,此外还有care home、care pathway、care work和care package。《牛津英语词典》关于名词care的词条在2001年增加了一些草案,对上面提到的特定搭配进行了评论。在医学语境中,照护通常等同于卫生工作者对患者的治疗,正如术语“照护途径”所示,照护途径的定义是诊断特定疾病的最佳步骤顺序和针对个人的治疗计划。卫生工作者提供的护理可被视为护理工作,但这类工作还包括照顾儿童、教学、照顾老人和为他人服务的家务劳动。就教学和保健而言,护理工作可能得到补偿,但正如女权主义经济学、性别研究和社会学等领域的学者长期以来所认识到的那样,护理工作通常描述的是非常必要的、但被低估的、不成比例地由妇女、少数民族、移民和穷人从事的无偿劳动。英国表达“社区护理”描述了在社区内或由亲戚而不是医院或其他机构为残疾人或有精神健康问题的个人提供的医疗或社会护理,这是政府旨在减少机构提供长期护理的政策的结果。从通过社会福利或公共援助方案提供照护,转向自给自足和个人对健康和福祉负责的观念,这种类似的转变在目前对“自我照护”一词的使用中很明显。根据《牛津英语词典》,这个词最早出现在16世纪中期,意为“关心或关心自己;自利行为”,但在19世纪中期扩展为“照顾自己的健康、外表或幸福的活动”,这是今天普遍使用的意思。照顾好自己无疑是很重要的,然而最近关于自我护理的言论让这个词变得几乎毫无意义,公司、社交媒体和文章几乎把从点蜡烛到敷水疗面膜的一切事情都贴上了“自我护理”的标签。这种商品化的、新自由主义版本的自我照顾与作家、民权活动家奥德丽•洛德(Audre Lorde)在《光的爆发》(a Burst of Light, 1988)中所设想的相距甚远。她在书中写道:“照顾自己不是自我放纵,而是自我保护,这是一种政治斗争行为。”自我护理行业利用了新自由主义将健康责任转移给个人的趋势,在人们无法负担得起且公平地获得医疗和精神保健的情况下,自我护理消费品的销售蓬勃发展。关爱是人类、其他动物和植物生存的基本需求。没有它,社会将停止运转。然而,护理的提供并不公平——在工作场所和家庭中,护理仍然高度性别化,妇女占全球卫生和社会护理工作人员的70%(世界卫生组织)。名词和动词care早期的负面含义在careworn、caregiving、care work和caregiver burnout等词中仍然有回响,暗示照顾是累人的甚至是一种负担。这种担心照顾他人的责任可能会降低工作效率或一个人的竞争能力,这种担心被“人人为自己”的理想新自由主义愿景放大了。因此,即使目前到处都在谈论护理和声称重视护理,但护理工作、护理人员和最需要护理的人的持续贬值和边缘化说明了一个不同的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care

With global shortages of health-care workers, child care, eldercare and care for people with disabilities, news outlets around the world have reported a care crisis worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. In The Care Manifesto (Verso Books, 2020), the authors observe, ‘Rhetorically at least, governments worldwide have responded [to the pandemic], and in sharp contrast to 2019, talk of care is currently everywhere’ (p.7). A glimpse into care's long history adds what Raymond Williams described as ‘just that extra edge of consciousness’ (Keywords, 1976) to understand the implications of care in contemporary English usage. The word's complexity arises not only from its status as a noun and a verb but also from its ability to describe, variously, an action, a feeling, supervision, paid or unpaid labour and the object of care itself, as well as from the word's strong association with conflicting ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ emotions.

The word care is inherited from Germanic and first attested before the eleventh century in its noun and verb forms. Care the noun derives from Old English caru, cearu, and the verb derives from Old English carian. OED includes quotations from Beowulf (c. 975–1025) documenting some of the earliest uses in the entries for both the noun care (‘Cearu wæs geniwod, geworden in wicun’ [sorrow was renewed, it had come to the dwellings]) and for the verb (‘na ymb his lif cearað’ [he never cared about his life]). OED sense 1 of the noun care denotes ‘Mental suffering, sorrow, grief, trouble’ and ‘Utterance of sorrow; lamentation, mourning’ and is now obsolete. OED sense 2b of the entry to care remains an active sense of the word today: ‘To feel concern (great or little), be concerned, trouble oneself, feel interest. Also in colloquial phrases expressing or implying lack of interest or concern: for all I care, see if I care, who cares?’

Beginning in the thirteenth century, to care for described an other-directed action or provision: ‘to take thought for, provide for, look after, take care of’. Still active today, this sense of the verb to care applies in many contexts, including parenting, eldercare, pet keeping, farming, and health care. OED sense 5 of to care, the most recent sense of the verb, indicates the addition of an affective meaning. This sense of to care denoting ‘To have regard, fondness, or attachment for’ dates back to the sixteenth century and could be used to describe one's feelings about a person or a thing. The most common collocation used when this affective sense of care is meant is to care about, whereas to care for typically describes an action, i.e. hands-on caregiving. While the OED notes that the verb was originally used only in negative constructions (e.g. he never cared to; they cared for nothing; I care not), affirmative constructions are common in contemporary English usage.

Although the earliest sense of the noun care denoting sorrow or grief is obsolete, this association of care with ‘negative’ emotions and mental suffering is palpable in two senses of the word that are still active. OED sense 2 of care denotes ‘Burdened state of mind arising from fear, doubt, or concern about anything; solicitude, anxiety, mental perturbation’, and sense 3a defines care as ‘Serious or grave mental attention; the charging of the mind with anything; concern; heed, heedfulness, attention, regard; caution, pains’. These two senses of care highlight possible negative perceptions of caregiving as a burden and emphasize the potential physical, mental, and emotional impacts on carers. Other senses of the noun care still active today include the meaning ‘Charge; oversight with a view to protection, preservation, or guidance’ (OED sense 4a) and the related phrase to take care of (OED sense 4b), which can mean not only ‘to look after, provide for’ but, interestingly, also ‘to deal with, dispose of’. From the late sixteenth century, in addition to the meanings of care as a state of mind, action, and oversight, care also denotes the object of care or concern itself and is often used in the plural, as in the idioms ‘not a care in the world’ and ‘to have all the cares of the world on one's shoulders’.

Although the adjectival form careless originally meant ‘Free from care, anxiety, or apprehension’, this sense of the word became archaic from the seventeenth century, and this meaning is now attributed to the more positively connoted adjective, carefree, while careless suggests ‘having no care about’ or ‘inattentive, negligent, thoughtless’. The sense of the adjective careful ‘Full of grief; mournful; sorrowful’ is now obsolete, and this antonym of careless commonly suggests ‘circumspect, watchful, cautious’ and full of care or concern for someone or something or applying care or attention to one's work.

As this concise outline of the word's semantic development illustrates, care, with its noun and verb forms, has had multiple competing strands of meaning over the course of its long history, and the word has become more challenging in contemporary English usage. Both noun and verb forms of the word care show a high relative frequency, with the noun being more frequently used than the verb (100–1000 times vs. 10–100 times per million words) in typical modern English usage according to the OED. The wide range of collocations and modifiers of care explains the higher relative frequency of the noun. Some of the most common collocations consisting of modifiers preceding care include health care, child care, foster care, intensive care, primary care, and medical care. In these collocations, care refers to either paid or unpaid work provided by individuals (e.g. doctors, nurses, care assistants, parents, or other family members) or an institution to meet the physical, material, mental, social, and/or emotional needs of the receivers of care. Among the most commonly used verb collocations are take care, provide care, and receive care, which reflect the transactional and relational nature of care. Frequent collocations consisting of words that follow care include the near-synonyms caregiver, caretaker, and care provider, in addition to care home, care pathway, care work, and care package.

The OED entry for the noun care features a number of draft additions from 2001 that comment on specific collocations mentioned above. In medical contexts, care is often synonymous with treatment given to a patient by a health worker, as suggested by the term care pathway, defined as the optimal sequence of steps in the diagnosis of a particular disorder and the plan of treatment for an individual. Care provided by health workers may be considered care work, but this subtype of work also includes child care, teaching, eldercare, and domestic work done in the service of others. Care work may be compensated in the case of teaching and health care, but as scholars in fields such as feminist economics, gender studies, and sociology have long recognized, care work often describes unpaid labour that is deeply necessary but undervalued and disproportionately performed by women, ethnic minorities, immigrants, and the poor. The British expression care in the community describes medical or social care for people with disabilities or individuals living with a mental health issue within a community or by relatives instead of in hospitals or other institutions as a result of a governmental policy aiming to reduce institutional provision of long-term care.

A similar shift away from provisions of care through social welfare or public assistance programmes and toward ideas of self-sufficiency and individualized responsibility for health and well-being is evident in current use of the word self-care. According to the OED, the term was first attested in the mid-sixteenth century and denoted ‘Concern or regard for oneself; self-interested behavior’ but in the mid-nineteenth century expanded to mean ‘The activity of taking care of one's own health, appearance, or well-being’, the sense commonly used today. Caring for oneself is undoubtedly important, and yet recent self-care rhetoric has rendered the term nearly meaningless, with companies, social media posts, and articles labelling almost everything from lighting a candle to applying a spa face mask #selfcare. This commodified, neoliberal version of self-care is a far cry from what writer and civil rights activist Audre Lorde envisioned when she wrote the following in A Burst of Light (1988): ‘Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare’ (p.131). The self-care industry has capitalized on the neoliberal shift of responsibility for well-being to individuals, and sales of self-care consumer goods have boomed in the absence of affordable and equitable access to medical and mental health care.

Care is a basic need essential for the survival of humans, other animals, and plants alike. Without it, societies would cease to function. Yet care is not provided equitably—it remains highly gendered in both the workplace and the home, with women accounting for 70% of the global health and social care workforce (World Health Organization). Early negative connotations of the noun and verb care still echo in words such as careworn, caregiving, care work, and caregiver burnout, implying that care is exhausting or even a burden. This fear that caregiving responsibilities could reduce work productivity or one's ability to compete is amplified by the ideal neoliberal vision of ‘every person for themselves’. Thus, even if talk of care and claims to value it are currently heard everywhere, the continued devaluation and marginalization of care work, of caregivers, and of the people most in need of care tells a different story.

See access, emotion, empathy, responsibility, well-being

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CRITICAL QUARTERLY
CRITICAL QUARTERLY LITERARY REVIEWS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Critical Quarterly is internationally renowned for it unique blend of literary criticism, cultural studies, poetry and fiction. The journal addresses the whole range of cultural forms so that discussions of, for example, cinema and television can appear alongside analyses of the accepted literary canon. It is a necessary condition of debate in these areas that it should involve as many and as varied voices as possible, and Critical Quarterly welcomes submissions from new researchers and writers as well as more established contributors.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial Revaluations ‘Notebook Literature’: Virginia Woolf and Marion Milner Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1