十字架、新月、斜线、星星:非裔美国人陶器和埃奇菲尔德区陶器标记

J. Joseph
{"title":"十字架、新月、斜线、星星:非裔美国人陶器和埃奇菲尔德区陶器标记","authors":"J. Joseph","doi":"10.1080/21619441.2017.1345107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Alkaline-glazed stoneware developed in the Edgefield District of South Carolina in the early nineteenth century and employed a range of decorations and marks that drew from European ceramic traditions and reflected pottery factory owner’s preferences, styles, and tastes. However, Edgefield stoneware also includes symbols and marks that were used by African-American potters who worked in the District and who made many Edgefield pots. Chief among these are variations of the cross mark, a core symbol employed by African Americans and seen in other ceramics and other media. Other marks, including slash and punctate marks, also have West African associations as “country marks” used in scarification to express cultural and social identity. Employing a database of pottery marks, this article examines the types of marks employed in the Edgefield District, their locations, their use as indicators of pottery manufacturer or individual potter, their designation of vessel attributes, their use as decoration, and their role as marks of cultural identity.","PeriodicalId":37778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21619441.2017.1345107","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crosses, Crescents, Slashes, Stars: African-American Potters and Edgefield District Pottery Marks\",\"authors\":\"J. Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21619441.2017.1345107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Alkaline-glazed stoneware developed in the Edgefield District of South Carolina in the early nineteenth century and employed a range of decorations and marks that drew from European ceramic traditions and reflected pottery factory owner’s preferences, styles, and tastes. However, Edgefield stoneware also includes symbols and marks that were used by African-American potters who worked in the District and who made many Edgefield pots. Chief among these are variations of the cross mark, a core symbol employed by African Americans and seen in other ceramics and other media. Other marks, including slash and punctate marks, also have West African associations as “country marks” used in scarification to express cultural and social identity. Employing a database of pottery marks, this article examines the types of marks employed in the Edgefield District, their locations, their use as indicators of pottery manufacturer or individual potter, their designation of vessel attributes, their use as decoration, and their role as marks of cultural identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21619441.2017.1345107\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21619441.2017.1345107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21619441.2017.1345107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要19世纪初,在南卡罗来纳州埃奇菲尔德区开发的碱性釉面陶器采用了一系列源自欧洲陶瓷传统的装饰和标记,反映了陶器厂主的偏好、风格和品味。然而,埃奇菲尔德陶器也包括在该地区工作的非裔美国陶艺家使用的符号和标记,他们制作了许多埃奇菲尔德壶。其中最主要的是十字记号的变体,这是非裔美国人使用的核心符号,出现在其他陶瓷和其他媒体上。其他标记,包括斜杠和标点符号,也被西非人视为“国家标记”,用于表示文化和社会身份。本文利用陶器标记数据库,研究了埃奇菲尔德区使用的标记类型、它们的位置、它们作为陶器制造商或个体陶工的指标的用途、它们对器皿属性的指定、它们作为装饰的用途以及它们作为文化身份标记的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crosses, Crescents, Slashes, Stars: African-American Potters and Edgefield District Pottery Marks
ABSTRACT Alkaline-glazed stoneware developed in the Edgefield District of South Carolina in the early nineteenth century and employed a range of decorations and marks that drew from European ceramic traditions and reflected pottery factory owner’s preferences, styles, and tastes. However, Edgefield stoneware also includes symbols and marks that were used by African-American potters who worked in the District and who made many Edgefield pots. Chief among these are variations of the cross mark, a core symbol employed by African Americans and seen in other ceramics and other media. Other marks, including slash and punctate marks, also have West African associations as “country marks” used in scarification to express cultural and social identity. Employing a database of pottery marks, this article examines the types of marks employed in the Edgefield District, their locations, their use as indicators of pottery manufacturer or individual potter, their designation of vessel attributes, their use as decoration, and their role as marks of cultural identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage provides a focal point for peer-reviewed publications in interdisciplinary studies in archaeology, history, material culture, and heritage dynamics concerning African descendant populations and cultures across the globe. The Journal invites articles on broad topics, including the historical processes of culture, economics, gender, power, and racialization operating within and upon African descendant communities. We seek to engage scholarly, professional, and community perspectives on the social dynamics and historical legacies of African descendant cultures and communities worldwide. The Journal publishes research articles and essays that review developments in these interdisciplinary fields.
期刊最新文献
Renegotiating and Theorizing Heritage in the Context of “Disaster” in the Caribbean: The Entanglement of Haitian Disaster-Related Histories African Presence in Portugal: People and Things Within Material, Social, and Power Relations Enslavement to Enlistment: Refiguring Opportunity for African Americans in the Military Black Disability Politics in Black Military Service: A Perspective from Nineteenth-Century Fort Davis, Texas An Archaeology of Convict Leasing in the American South
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1