工会谈判瑞典模式:种族资本主义、白人和种族的隐形

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Race & Class Pub Date : 2023-02-25 DOI:10.1177/03063968231153561
Paula Mulinari, Anders Neergaard
{"title":"工会谈判瑞典模式:种族资本主义、白人和种族的隐形","authors":"Paula Mulinari, Anders Neergaard","doi":"10.1177/03063968231153561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In October 2022, a new employment protection regulation, often seen as a core aspect of the Swedish model of industrial relations, was implemented in Sweden. While the debate around the new regulation was heated, one interesting omission was that, in the unions’ advocacy for maintaining various forms of labour market security, the racialised labour market was never discussed, despite a strong racially segmented labour market with varying working conditions. In this article we explore how three white, male-dominated trade unions representing employees in different class locations positioned themselves around the change in the new Employment Act. Inspired by contributions on racial capitalism, we unravel how trade unions take part in the contestation over industrial relations in a context in which neoliberal and ethnoracial policies are growing. Using the ‘Swedish model’ as an ‘empty signifier’ – highly variable in meaning, hence contestable – we find that the unions advance three different positions on employment protection regulation: flexible, skilled and protective, and in doing so contribute to the self-racialisation of white male workers in working life.","PeriodicalId":47028,"journal":{"name":"Race & Class","volume":"64 1","pages":"48 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade unions negotiating the Swedish model: racial capitalism, whiteness and the invisibility of race\",\"authors\":\"Paula Mulinari, Anders Neergaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03063968231153561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In October 2022, a new employment protection regulation, often seen as a core aspect of the Swedish model of industrial relations, was implemented in Sweden. While the debate around the new regulation was heated, one interesting omission was that, in the unions’ advocacy for maintaining various forms of labour market security, the racialised labour market was never discussed, despite a strong racially segmented labour market with varying working conditions. In this article we explore how three white, male-dominated trade unions representing employees in different class locations positioned themselves around the change in the new Employment Act. Inspired by contributions on racial capitalism, we unravel how trade unions take part in the contestation over industrial relations in a context in which neoliberal and ethnoracial policies are growing. Using the ‘Swedish model’ as an ‘empty signifier’ – highly variable in meaning, hence contestable – we find that the unions advance three different positions on employment protection regulation: flexible, skilled and protective, and in doing so contribute to the self-racialisation of white male workers in working life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Race & Class\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"48 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Race & Class\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063968231153561\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race & Class","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063968231153561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2022年10月,瑞典实施了一项新的就业保护条例,该条例通常被视为瑞典劳资关系模式的核心方面。虽然围绕新规定的辩论很激烈,但一个有趣的遗漏是,在工会倡导维持各种形式的劳动力市场安全时,从未讨论过种族化的劳动力市场,尽管劳动力市场存在着强大的种族分割,工作条件各不相同。在本文中,我们将探讨代表不同阶层员工的三个白人男性主导的工会如何围绕新《就业法》的变化定位自己。在对种族资本主义的贡献的启发下,我们揭示了工会如何在新自由主义和种族政策不断发展的背景下参与劳资关系的争论。使用“瑞典模式”作为一个“空的能指”——在意义上高度可变,因此是有争议的——我们发现工会在就业保护法规上提出了三种不同的立场:灵活的、熟练的和保护性的,这样做有助于白人男性工人在工作生活中的自我种族化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trade unions negotiating the Swedish model: racial capitalism, whiteness and the invisibility of race
In October 2022, a new employment protection regulation, often seen as a core aspect of the Swedish model of industrial relations, was implemented in Sweden. While the debate around the new regulation was heated, one interesting omission was that, in the unions’ advocacy for maintaining various forms of labour market security, the racialised labour market was never discussed, despite a strong racially segmented labour market with varying working conditions. In this article we explore how three white, male-dominated trade unions representing employees in different class locations positioned themselves around the change in the new Employment Act. Inspired by contributions on racial capitalism, we unravel how trade unions take part in the contestation over industrial relations in a context in which neoliberal and ethnoracial policies are growing. Using the ‘Swedish model’ as an ‘empty signifier’ – highly variable in meaning, hence contestable – we find that the unions advance three different positions on employment protection regulation: flexible, skilled and protective, and in doing so contribute to the self-racialisation of white male workers in working life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Race & Class
Race & Class Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Race & Class is a refereed, ISI-ranked publication, the foremost English language journal on racism and imperialism in the world today. For three decades it has established a reputation for the breadth of its analysis, its global outlook and its multidisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Sectarianism as racism: the collective punishment of Alevi communities in Turkey Life next to a landfill: urban marginality, environmental injustice and the Roma Disabling Palestine: the case of Gaza’s Great March of Return Fractured: race, class, gender and the hatred of identity politics By Michael Richmond And Alex Charnley Private Worlds by Jeremy Seabrook: a response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1