后进先出法的兴衰

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Historians Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.2308/aahj-2021-010
D. Tinkelman, Qianhua Ling
{"title":"后进先出法的兴衰","authors":"D. Tinkelman, Qianhua Ling","doi":"10.2308/aahj-2021-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We trace the history of LIFO from the 1930s to 2021. LIFO usage rose sharply in the 1970s. LIFO’s supporters praised its matching of recent costs against sales, and its nonrecognition of inventory holding gains. Managers appreciated its tax-lowering effects in inflationary periods. The 1970s LIFO adoptions spurred accounting research into market efficiency and accounting choice. LIFO’s tax advantages began decreasing in the 1980s due to lower tax rates, low inflation, and changing inventory practices. Its theoretical justification weakened as the FASB adopted a Conceptual Framework in the 1980s that deemphasized matching, and instead valued relevance, decision-usefulness, representational faithfulness, and comparability. Without major tax advantages or strong theoretical justifications, LIFO usage declined markedly beginning in the mid-1980s. The IASB disallowed LIFO in 2005. By 2020, LIFO had become a niche method, surviving mainly due to the LIFO conformity rule. Whether its use will increase with renewed inflation is unclear.","PeriodicalId":43735,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Historians Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rise and Decline of LIFO\",\"authors\":\"D. Tinkelman, Qianhua Ling\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/aahj-2021-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We trace the history of LIFO from the 1930s to 2021. LIFO usage rose sharply in the 1970s. LIFO’s supporters praised its matching of recent costs against sales, and its nonrecognition of inventory holding gains. Managers appreciated its tax-lowering effects in inflationary periods. The 1970s LIFO adoptions spurred accounting research into market efficiency and accounting choice. LIFO’s tax advantages began decreasing in the 1980s due to lower tax rates, low inflation, and changing inventory practices. Its theoretical justification weakened as the FASB adopted a Conceptual Framework in the 1980s that deemphasized matching, and instead valued relevance, decision-usefulness, representational faithfulness, and comparability. Without major tax advantages or strong theoretical justifications, LIFO usage declined markedly beginning in the mid-1980s. The IASB disallowed LIFO in 2005. By 2020, LIFO had become a niche method, surviving mainly due to the LIFO conformity rule. Whether its use will increase with renewed inflation is unclear.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Historians Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Historians Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2021-010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Historians Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2021-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们追溯了后进先出法从20世纪30年代到2021年的历史。后进先出法的使用在20世纪70年代急剧增加。后进先出法的支持者称赞其近期成本与销售额的匹配,以及对库存持有收益的不认可。经理们对其在通货膨胀时期的减税效果表示赞赏。20世纪70年代采用后进先出法促使会计界对市场效率和会计选择进行研究。由于较低的税率、较低的通货膨胀率和不断变化的库存做法,后进先出法的税收优势在20世纪80年代开始减少。随着FASB在20世纪80年代采用了一个概念框架,该框架不再强调匹配,而是重视相关性、决策有用性、表征忠实性和可比性,其理论合理性减弱。由于没有重大的税收优惠或强有力的理论依据,后进先出法的使用从20世纪80年代中期开始显著下降。国际会计准则理事会在2005年否决了后进先出法。到2020年,后进先出法已经成为一种小众方法,主要由于后进先出规则的一致性而得以幸存。它的使用是否会随着通货膨胀的加剧而增加尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Rise and Decline of LIFO
We trace the history of LIFO from the 1930s to 2021. LIFO usage rose sharply in the 1970s. LIFO’s supporters praised its matching of recent costs against sales, and its nonrecognition of inventory holding gains. Managers appreciated its tax-lowering effects in inflationary periods. The 1970s LIFO adoptions spurred accounting research into market efficiency and accounting choice. LIFO’s tax advantages began decreasing in the 1980s due to lower tax rates, low inflation, and changing inventory practices. Its theoretical justification weakened as the FASB adopted a Conceptual Framework in the 1980s that deemphasized matching, and instead valued relevance, decision-usefulness, representational faithfulness, and comparability. Without major tax advantages or strong theoretical justifications, LIFO usage declined markedly beginning in the mid-1980s. The IASB disallowed LIFO in 2005. By 2020, LIFO had become a niche method, surviving mainly due to the LIFO conformity rule. Whether its use will increase with renewed inflation is unclear.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Historians Journal
Accounting Historians Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Accounting Historians Journal is an international journal that addresses the development of accounting thought and practice. AHJ embraces all subject matter related to accounting history, including but not limited to research that provides historical perspective on contemporary issues.
期刊最新文献
A History of the Academy of Accounting Historians: 2014–2023 The Impact of World War II on Accounting and Finance at the Alger-Sullivan Lumber Company in Century, Florida The First PCAOB Director of Registration and Inspections George Henry Diacont Peculiarities of Accounting Practices in Francesco Datini’s Partnership in Pisa Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1