古弗里斯兰复合词:亲属术语

K. Pospelova
{"title":"古弗里斯兰复合词:亲属术语","authors":"K. Pospelova","doi":"10.15823/ZZ.2017.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Together with derivation, compounding is one of the most important word-building processes in the world languages. In the Germanic languages, compounding has become extremely productive (Müller, 2015). As opposed to studies in other Old Germanic languages, compounding in Old Frisian (OFr) has not been investigated in full. Unlike in the neighbouring languages, only a small number of OFr lexemes is present in the most comprehensive book on Old Germanic nominal compounds (Carr, 1939). The semantic field of kinship terms includes basic concepts reflected in the lexis of a language. A lot of OFr kinship terms are compounds. The questions posed in this paper are what compounding models are used to build up OFr kinship terms: (1) in terms of the Sanskrit classification, (2) in terms of parts of speech used as the constituents, (3) in terms of the semantic connection between the constituents. In order to do that, compound structures are split into constituents and then formally analyzed. Statistical analysis reflects the productivity of compounding patterns and the balance between the trends. Thereafter, the formal data are compared to the semantic patterns identified within the compounds. The end goal is to assess the degree of the interconnection between the morphological and semantic levels. The data can be used to compare the trends in OFr and in the related Old Germanic languages in order to contribute to the theory of compounding in Germanic.","PeriodicalId":30077,"journal":{"name":"Zmogus ir Zodis","volume":"19 1","pages":"79-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Old Frisian compounds: kinship terms\",\"authors\":\"K. Pospelova\",\"doi\":\"10.15823/ZZ.2017.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Together with derivation, compounding is one of the most important word-building processes in the world languages. In the Germanic languages, compounding has become extremely productive (Müller, 2015). As opposed to studies in other Old Germanic languages, compounding in Old Frisian (OFr) has not been investigated in full. Unlike in the neighbouring languages, only a small number of OFr lexemes is present in the most comprehensive book on Old Germanic nominal compounds (Carr, 1939). The semantic field of kinship terms includes basic concepts reflected in the lexis of a language. A lot of OFr kinship terms are compounds. The questions posed in this paper are what compounding models are used to build up OFr kinship terms: (1) in terms of the Sanskrit classification, (2) in terms of parts of speech used as the constituents, (3) in terms of the semantic connection between the constituents. In order to do that, compound structures are split into constituents and then formally analyzed. Statistical analysis reflects the productivity of compounding patterns and the balance between the trends. Thereafter, the formal data are compared to the semantic patterns identified within the compounds. The end goal is to assess the degree of the interconnection between the morphological and semantic levels. The data can be used to compare the trends in OFr and in the related Old Germanic languages in order to contribute to the theory of compounding in Germanic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zmogus ir Zodis\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"79-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zmogus ir Zodis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15823/ZZ.2017.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zmogus ir Zodis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15823/ZZ.2017.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

复合和派生是世界语言中最重要的构词过程之一。在日耳曼语言中,复合已经变得非常有成效(m ller, 2015)。与对其他古日耳曼语言的研究相反,对古弗里斯兰语(OFr)的复合语尚未进行全面研究。与邻近的语言不同,在最全面的关于古日耳曼名词复合词的书中,只有少量的OFr词素出现(Carr, 1939)。亲属术语的语义场包括语言词汇所反映的基本概念。很多OFr亲属术语都是复合词。本文提出的问题是用什么组合模型来构建OFr亲属术语:(1)根据梵语分类,(2)根据作为组成成分的词类,(3)根据组成成分之间的语义联系。为了做到这一点,复合结构被分解成成分,然后正式分析。统计分析反映了复合模式的生产力和趋势之间的平衡。然后,将形式数据与复合词中识别的语义模式进行比较。最终目标是评估形态和语义层次之间的互连程度。这些数据可以用来比较OFr和相关的古日耳曼语言的趋势,以便为日耳曼语的复合理论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Old Frisian compounds: kinship terms
Together with derivation, compounding is one of the most important word-building processes in the world languages. In the Germanic languages, compounding has become extremely productive (Müller, 2015). As opposed to studies in other Old Germanic languages, compounding in Old Frisian (OFr) has not been investigated in full. Unlike in the neighbouring languages, only a small number of OFr lexemes is present in the most comprehensive book on Old Germanic nominal compounds (Carr, 1939). The semantic field of kinship terms includes basic concepts reflected in the lexis of a language. A lot of OFr kinship terms are compounds. The questions posed in this paper are what compounding models are used to build up OFr kinship terms: (1) in terms of the Sanskrit classification, (2) in terms of parts of speech used as the constituents, (3) in terms of the semantic connection between the constituents. In order to do that, compound structures are split into constituents and then formally analyzed. Statistical analysis reflects the productivity of compounding patterns and the balance between the trends. Thereafter, the formal data are compared to the semantic patterns identified within the compounds. The end goal is to assess the degree of the interconnection between the morphological and semantic levels. The data can be used to compare the trends in OFr and in the related Old Germanic languages in order to contribute to the theory of compounding in Germanic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efektyvaus užsienio kalbų mokymo(si) veiksniai: studentų požiūrio analizė Muzikinis anglų kalbos ritmo mokymas Sėkmingos užsienio kalbos pamokos: atvejo analizė Kultūrinės ir kalbinės tarpkultūrinio vertimo spragos Tekstyno duomenimis pagrįstas britų anglų kalbos konstrukcijų su veiksmažodiniais daiktavardžiais CHAT, TALK ir CONVERSATION tyrimas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1