心力衰竭应对(COPE-HF)伙伴关系干预心力衰竭症状:对姑息治疗的影响

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE Pub Date : 2022-10-04 DOI:10.1080/09699260.2022.2124144
L. Graven, L. Abbott, G. Schluck
{"title":"心力衰竭应对(COPE-HF)伙伴关系干预心力衰竭症状:对姑息治疗的影响","authors":"L. Graven, L. Abbott, G. Schluck","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2022.2124144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A major focus of HF palliative care is to reduce symptom burden, yet managing HF symptoms is complex and requires adequate problem-solving skills. Telehealth interventions that provide support and problem-solving training may enhance symptom management and reduce symptom distress. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the preliminary effectiveness of the Coping in Heart Failure (COPE-HF) Partnership telehealth intervention (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05337293) on HF symptom frequency, severity, and symptom-related degree of interference with physical activity and enjoyment of life. Methods This was a three-group randomized controlled pilot study. The intervention group received one home visit and weekly (first month), then biweekly (months 2, 3) telephone calls. The attention group received a sham intervention on a similar schedule. The control group received usual care. The Heart Failure Symptom Survey was administered at baseline, 5, 9, and 13 weeks. Linear mixed modeling with restricted maximum likelihood estimation examined intervention effects on study outcomes. Results Of 107 enrolled participants, 66 completed the study. Participants were 61 years old; 56% non-Caucasian; and 54.2% male. Significant improvement in total HF symptoms and all sub-scales from baseline to 13 weeks were noted in the intervention group, with the largest improvement seen in HF symptom severity (md  = −2.59, <0.001, 95% CI [−3.65, −1.53]). Conclusion Providing support and tailored problem-solving training as a component of palliative care may empower patients to develop strategies to manage bothersome symptoms, thereby decreasing symptom severity. However, more research is needed to examine this intervention in a larger sample. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05337293.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The coping in heart failure (COPE-HF) partnership intervention for heart failure symptoms: Implications for palliative care\",\"authors\":\"L. Graven, L. Abbott, G. Schluck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09699260.2022.2124144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background A major focus of HF palliative care is to reduce symptom burden, yet managing HF symptoms is complex and requires adequate problem-solving skills. Telehealth interventions that provide support and problem-solving training may enhance symptom management and reduce symptom distress. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the preliminary effectiveness of the Coping in Heart Failure (COPE-HF) Partnership telehealth intervention (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05337293) on HF symptom frequency, severity, and symptom-related degree of interference with physical activity and enjoyment of life. Methods This was a three-group randomized controlled pilot study. The intervention group received one home visit and weekly (first month), then biweekly (months 2, 3) telephone calls. The attention group received a sham intervention on a similar schedule. The control group received usual care. The Heart Failure Symptom Survey was administered at baseline, 5, 9, and 13 weeks. Linear mixed modeling with restricted maximum likelihood estimation examined intervention effects on study outcomes. Results Of 107 enrolled participants, 66 completed the study. Participants were 61 years old; 56% non-Caucasian; and 54.2% male. Significant improvement in total HF symptoms and all sub-scales from baseline to 13 weeks were noted in the intervention group, with the largest improvement seen in HF symptom severity (md  = −2.59, <0.001, 95% CI [−3.65, −1.53]). Conclusion Providing support and tailored problem-solving training as a component of palliative care may empower patients to develop strategies to manage bothersome symptoms, thereby decreasing symptom severity. However, more research is needed to examine this intervention in a larger sample. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05337293.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2022.2124144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2022.2124144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

心衰姑息治疗的一个主要重点是减轻症状负担,然而管理心衰症状是复杂的,需要足够的解决问题的技能。提供支持和解决问题培训的远程保健干预措施可加强症状管理并减少症状困扰。目的本研究的目的是探讨应对心力衰竭(COPE-HF)伙伴关系远程医疗干预(ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT05337293)对心力衰竭症状频率、严重程度和症状相关程度对身体活动和生活享受的干扰的初步有效性。方法采用三组随机对照先导研究。干预组接受一次家访和每周一次(第一个月),然后每两周一次(第2、3个月)电话拜访。注意组按照类似的时间表接受假干预。对照组接受常规护理。心衰症状调查在基线、5周、9周和13周进行。限制最大似然估计的线性混合模型检验了干预对研究结果的影响。结果在107名参与者中,66人完成了研究。参与者年龄61岁;白人的56%;54.2%是男性。从基线到13周,干预组总心衰症状和所有亚量表均有显著改善,心衰症状严重程度改善最大(md = - 2.59, <0.001, 95% CI[- 3.65, - 1.53])。结论:作为姑息治疗的一个组成部分,提供支持和量身定制的问题解决培训可能使患者能够制定策略来管理令人烦恼的症状,从而降低症状的严重程度。然而,需要更多的研究在更大的样本中检验这种干预措施。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05337293。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The coping in heart failure (COPE-HF) partnership intervention for heart failure symptoms: Implications for palliative care
Background A major focus of HF palliative care is to reduce symptom burden, yet managing HF symptoms is complex and requires adequate problem-solving skills. Telehealth interventions that provide support and problem-solving training may enhance symptom management and reduce symptom distress. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the preliminary effectiveness of the Coping in Heart Failure (COPE-HF) Partnership telehealth intervention (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05337293) on HF symptom frequency, severity, and symptom-related degree of interference with physical activity and enjoyment of life. Methods This was a three-group randomized controlled pilot study. The intervention group received one home visit and weekly (first month), then biweekly (months 2, 3) telephone calls. The attention group received a sham intervention on a similar schedule. The control group received usual care. The Heart Failure Symptom Survey was administered at baseline, 5, 9, and 13 weeks. Linear mixed modeling with restricted maximum likelihood estimation examined intervention effects on study outcomes. Results Of 107 enrolled participants, 66 completed the study. Participants were 61 years old; 56% non-Caucasian; and 54.2% male. Significant improvement in total HF symptoms and all sub-scales from baseline to 13 weeks were noted in the intervention group, with the largest improvement seen in HF symptom severity (md  = −2.59, <0.001, 95% CI [−3.65, −1.53]). Conclusion Providing support and tailored problem-solving training as a component of palliative care may empower patients to develop strategies to manage bothersome symptoms, thereby decreasing symptom severity. However, more research is needed to examine this intervention in a larger sample. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05337293.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID-19 and community services on palliative care unit admissions: A retrospective cohort study A qualitative evidence synthesis exploring the attitudes, beliefs and values of the long-term care workforce towards palliative care Evidence-based physiotherapy interventions: evaluation of current practice in a palliative care service Feasibility and economic benefits of community-based palliative care in regional Australia: A case study with cost analysis Exploring the competency and confidence levels of physiotherapists in the management of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illnesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1