风险前景中权衡概率和收益的性别差异:来自马来西亚的实验证据

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS New Zealand Economic Papers Pub Date : 2019-11-04 DOI:10.1080/00779954.2019.1684349
Ch’ng Kean-Siang, S. Narayanan, Tan Scaik Lin
{"title":"风险前景中权衡概率和收益的性别差异:来自马来西亚的实验证据","authors":"Ch’ng Kean-Siang, S. Narayanan, Tan Scaik Lin","doi":"10.1080/00779954.2019.1684349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines gender differences in evaluating the probability and the outcome (payoff) of a risky prospect, when making a decision in both the gain and loss domains in Malaysia. Our study adds to the small but growing literature on experimental studies in a non-Western context. We found that in evaluating the probability of a risky project, females appear to be more risk averse than males in the lotteries for which both genders were risk averse but seem to be more risk-seeking than males in lotteries for which both genders were predominantly risk-seeking. This was the case in both the loss and gain domains. In evaluating the outcome of risky projects, our results suggest that although both genders exhibit diminishing sensitivity to outcome/payoff of lotteries in both the loss and gain domains, the curvature in both domains was not significantly different for both genders. These findings are consistent with studies elsewhere and do not indicate that cultural contexts influence gender reactions to risk.","PeriodicalId":38921,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Economic Papers","volume":"55 1","pages":"263 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00779954.2019.1684349","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in weighing probability and payoffs in risky prospects: experimental evidence from Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Ch’ng Kean-Siang, S. Narayanan, Tan Scaik Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00779954.2019.1684349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines gender differences in evaluating the probability and the outcome (payoff) of a risky prospect, when making a decision in both the gain and loss domains in Malaysia. Our study adds to the small but growing literature on experimental studies in a non-Western context. We found that in evaluating the probability of a risky project, females appear to be more risk averse than males in the lotteries for which both genders were risk averse but seem to be more risk-seeking than males in lotteries for which both genders were predominantly risk-seeking. This was the case in both the loss and gain domains. In evaluating the outcome of risky projects, our results suggest that although both genders exhibit diminishing sensitivity to outcome/payoff of lotteries in both the loss and gain domains, the curvature in both domains was not significantly different for both genders. These findings are consistent with studies elsewhere and do not indicate that cultural contexts influence gender reactions to risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"263 - 276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00779954.2019.1684349\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2019.1684349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2019.1684349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了在马来西亚,当在收益和损失领域做出决策时,在评估风险前景的概率和结果(回报)时的性别差异。我们的研究增加了关于非西方背景下实验研究的少量但不断增长的文献。我们发现,在评估风险项目的概率时,在男女都厌恶风险的彩票中,女性似乎比男性更厌恶风险,但在男女都主要追求风险的彩票上,女性似乎更追求风险。损失域和收益域都是这种情况。在评估风险项目的结果时,我们的结果表明,尽管在损失和收益两个领域,两性对彩票结果/回报的敏感性都在下降,但两个领域的曲率对两性来说没有显著差异。这些发现与其他地方的研究一致,并没有表明文化背景会影响性别对风险的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender differences in weighing probability and payoffs in risky prospects: experimental evidence from Malaysia
This paper examines gender differences in evaluating the probability and the outcome (payoff) of a risky prospect, when making a decision in both the gain and loss domains in Malaysia. Our study adds to the small but growing literature on experimental studies in a non-Western context. We found that in evaluating the probability of a risky project, females appear to be more risk averse than males in the lotteries for which both genders were risk averse but seem to be more risk-seeking than males in lotteries for which both genders were predominantly risk-seeking. This was the case in both the loss and gain domains. In evaluating the outcome of risky projects, our results suggest that although both genders exhibit diminishing sensitivity to outcome/payoff of lotteries in both the loss and gain domains, the curvature in both domains was not significantly different for both genders. These findings are consistent with studies elsewhere and do not indicate that cultural contexts influence gender reactions to risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Economic Papers
New Zealand Economic Papers Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Community-level ethnic diversity and community-level socio-economic development: evidence from 20 African countries The wage cost of a lack of access to affordable childcare in Aotearoa New Zealand Distinguished fellow lecture: monetary policy and the benefits and limits of central bank independence Differences between NZ and U.S. individual investor sentiment: more noise or more information? Citation for Bob Buckle to mark his Distinguished Fellow Award
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1