基于日本药物警戒数据库的针对口服5-氨基水杨酸盐治疗炎症性肠病给药系统差异的信号检测研究

Y. Noguchi, Shuji Yamashita, Hirofumi Tamaki, A. Osanai, Y. Ino, T. Tachi, K. Iguchi, H. Teramachi
{"title":"基于日本药物警戒数据库的针对口服5-氨基水杨酸盐治疗炎症性肠病给药系统差异的信号检测研究","authors":"Y. Noguchi, Shuji Yamashita, Hirofumi Tamaki, A. Osanai, Y. Ino, T. Tachi, K. Iguchi, H. Teramachi","doi":"10.3390/pharma2010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although 5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) has been shown to act on the local mucosa, when 5-ASA is orally administered, most of it is absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract and does not reach the large intestine, where lesions are present. Therefore, different drug delivery systems have been developed for each oral 5-ASA formulation. Currently, the oral 5-ASA formulation approved in Japan is salazosulfapyridine (SALAZOPYRIN®; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Tokyo, Japan), in which 5-ASA and sulfapyridine are azo-bonded. In addition, there are several 5-ASA release formulations, including ASACOL®; ZERIA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on pH), PENTASA®; KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on time), and LIALDA®; MOCHIDA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on pH and time). Adverse events may occur because of differences in the drug delivery systems of these products. In this study, we focused on the adverse events of different 5-ASA formulations and investigated differences in the detection of safety signals for each 5-ASA formulation using disproportionality analysis. There were 15 adverse events detected only with SALAZOPYRIN®. On the other hand, ASACOL®, PENTASA®, and LIALDA® have different drug delivery systems. Although the detected signal intensities varied, the detected adverse events were not significantly different. These findings provide important insights, which should be considered by physicians during treatment selection and drug manufacturers during drug development.","PeriodicalId":74431,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signal Detection Study Focusing on Differences in the Drug Delivery System of Oral 5-Aminosalicylate for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database\",\"authors\":\"Y. Noguchi, Shuji Yamashita, Hirofumi Tamaki, A. Osanai, Y. Ino, T. Tachi, K. Iguchi, H. Teramachi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharma2010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although 5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) has been shown to act on the local mucosa, when 5-ASA is orally administered, most of it is absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract and does not reach the large intestine, where lesions are present. Therefore, different drug delivery systems have been developed for each oral 5-ASA formulation. Currently, the oral 5-ASA formulation approved in Japan is salazosulfapyridine (SALAZOPYRIN®; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Tokyo, Japan), in which 5-ASA and sulfapyridine are azo-bonded. In addition, there are several 5-ASA release formulations, including ASACOL®; ZERIA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on pH), PENTASA®; KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on time), and LIALDA®; MOCHIDA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on pH and time). Adverse events may occur because of differences in the drug delivery systems of these products. In this study, we focused on the adverse events of different 5-ASA formulations and investigated differences in the detection of safety signals for each 5-ASA formulation using disproportionality analysis. There were 15 adverse events detected only with SALAZOPYRIN®. On the other hand, ASACOL®, PENTASA®, and LIALDA® have different drug delivery systems. Although the detected signal intensities varied, the detected adverse events were not significantly different. These findings provide important insights, which should be considered by physicians during treatment selection and drug manufacturers during drug development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma2010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma2010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)已被证明对局部粘膜起作用,但当5-ASA口服给药时,大部分被上胃肠道吸收,而不会到达存在病变的大肠。因此,针对每种口服5-ASA制剂开发了不同的给药系统。目前,在日本批准的口服5-ASA制剂是salazosulfapyridine (SALAZOPYRIN®;辉瑞日本公司:东京,日本),其中5-ASA和磺胺吡啶是偶氮键。此外,还有几种5-ASA释放制剂,包括ASACOL®;ZERIA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd:东京,日本(取决于pH的缓释制剂),PENTASA®;KYORIN制药株式会社:日本东京(取决于时间的缓释制剂)和LIALDA®;MOCHIDA制药株式会社:日本东京(取决于pH和时间的缓释制剂)。由于这些产品的给药系统不同,可能会发生不良事件。在本研究中,我们重点研究了不同5-ASA配方的不良事件,并利用歧化分析研究了每种5-ASA配方在检测安全信号方面的差异。仅SALAZOPYRIN®组就检测到15个不良事件。另一方面,ASACOL®、PENTASA®和LIALDA®具有不同的给药系统。虽然检测到的信号强度不同,但检测到的不良事件没有显著差异。这些发现提供了重要的见解,医生在治疗选择和药物制造商在药物开发中应该考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Signal Detection Study Focusing on Differences in the Drug Delivery System of Oral 5-Aminosalicylate for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database
Although 5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) has been shown to act on the local mucosa, when 5-ASA is orally administered, most of it is absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract and does not reach the large intestine, where lesions are present. Therefore, different drug delivery systems have been developed for each oral 5-ASA formulation. Currently, the oral 5-ASA formulation approved in Japan is salazosulfapyridine (SALAZOPYRIN®; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Tokyo, Japan), in which 5-ASA and sulfapyridine are azo-bonded. In addition, there are several 5-ASA release formulations, including ASACOL®; ZERIA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on pH), PENTASA®; KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on time), and LIALDA®; MOCHIDA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan (delayed release formulation dependent on pH and time). Adverse events may occur because of differences in the drug delivery systems of these products. In this study, we focused on the adverse events of different 5-ASA formulations and investigated differences in the detection of safety signals for each 5-ASA formulation using disproportionality analysis. There were 15 adverse events detected only with SALAZOPYRIN®. On the other hand, ASACOL®, PENTASA®, and LIALDA® have different drug delivery systems. Although the detected signal intensities varied, the detected adverse events were not significantly different. These findings provide important insights, which should be considered by physicians during treatment selection and drug manufacturers during drug development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations between Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors and Polypharmacology Using a National Registry Approach A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Effectiveness of Tigecycline in the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea Association of Receipt of Opioid Prescription for Acute Post-Delivery Pain Management with Buprenorphine Discontinuation among Postpartum People with Opioid Use Disorder Pioneering Arterial Hypertension Phenotyping on Nationally Aggregated Electronic Health Records Affordability of Paediatric Oral Anti-Infective Medicines in a Selected District, Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1