不可言说的生态:20世纪10年代至80年代的大量调查中的生态科学与环境意识

Pub Date : 2022-04-27 DOI:10.1353/tcc.2022.0022
Y. Meng
{"title":"不可言说的生态:20世纪10年代至80年代的大量调查中的生态科学与环境意识","authors":"Y. Meng","doi":"10.1353/tcc.2022.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In identifying the modern origin of ecological studies, scholarship on \"ecological civilization\" (shengtai wenming) should have engaged with the fundamental question, that is, What are the modern and contemporary modes of our ethical, political, and economic relationship with coexisting nonhuman species and the planet Earth? Or, more definitely, Can or cannot the possibility of that coexistence be conceived in modern and contemporary terms? This paper draws critical attention to the fact that the cultural and conceptual formation of ecology (shengtai), a distinctly modern historical invention, generates more inquiries than answers. Questioning the possibility of speaking about ecology from within the politics of Green rhetoric, this paper engages the contested ethical and epistemological principles that constituted the foundation of ecological knowledge as well as the conceptual orientations to ecology in China from the 1910s to the 1980s.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unspeakable Ecology: Eco-Science and Environmental Awareness Through Thick Inquiries, 1910S–1980S\",\"authors\":\"Y. Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tcc.2022.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In identifying the modern origin of ecological studies, scholarship on \\\"ecological civilization\\\" (shengtai wenming) should have engaged with the fundamental question, that is, What are the modern and contemporary modes of our ethical, political, and economic relationship with coexisting nonhuman species and the planet Earth? Or, more definitely, Can or cannot the possibility of that coexistence be conceived in modern and contemporary terms? This paper draws critical attention to the fact that the cultural and conceptual formation of ecology (shengtai), a distinctly modern historical invention, generates more inquiries than answers. Questioning the possibility of speaking about ecology from within the politics of Green rhetoric, this paper engages the contested ethical and epistemological principles that constituted the foundation of ecological knowledge as well as the conceptual orientations to ecology in China from the 1910s to the 1980s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tcc.2022.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tcc.2022.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在确定生态学研究的现代起源时,“生态文明”学术应该涉及一个根本问题,即我们与共存的非人类物种和地球之间的伦理、政治和经济关系的现代和现代模式是什么?或者,更明确地说,这种共存的可能性可以或不能用现代和当代的术语来设想?本文提请批判性地注意这样一个事实,即生态学(升泰)的文化和概念形成,一个明显的现代历史发明,产生的询问多于答案。本文质疑从绿色修辞学的政治中谈论生态学的可能性,探讨了构成生态学知识基础的有争议的伦理和认识论原则,以及1910年代至1980年代中国生态学的概念取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Unspeakable Ecology: Eco-Science and Environmental Awareness Through Thick Inquiries, 1910S–1980S
Abstract:In identifying the modern origin of ecological studies, scholarship on "ecological civilization" (shengtai wenming) should have engaged with the fundamental question, that is, What are the modern and contemporary modes of our ethical, political, and economic relationship with coexisting nonhuman species and the planet Earth? Or, more definitely, Can or cannot the possibility of that coexistence be conceived in modern and contemporary terms? This paper draws critical attention to the fact that the cultural and conceptual formation of ecology (shengtai), a distinctly modern historical invention, generates more inquiries than answers. Questioning the possibility of speaking about ecology from within the politics of Green rhetoric, this paper engages the contested ethical and epistemological principles that constituted the foundation of ecological knowledge as well as the conceptual orientations to ecology in China from the 1910s to the 1980s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1