基于埃塞俄比亚大地重力数据的全球地球势模型评价

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Applied Geodesy Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI:10.1515/jag-2022-0051
Eyasu Alemu
{"title":"基于埃塞俄比亚大地重力数据的全球地球势模型评价","authors":"Eyasu Alemu","doi":"10.1515/jag-2022-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The availability of high-degree and recent global geopotential models is a crucial resource for different geodetic and geophysical applications such as modelling of geoid and quasi-geoid and establishing global reference and height systems, estimating Moho depth, gravity anomaly and tectonics, other geopotential functional, and oceanography, which emphasizes the importance for model evaluation. We have therefore estimated complete Bouguer anomalies and Moho whose results are evaluated with the terrestrial values. We validate the recently released satellite-only and high-degree combined GGMs over Ethiopia using terrestrial gravity data based on a statistical comparison of the Bouguer anomaly, its residual and Moho depth. The terrestrial-derived gravity anomaly is more accurately estimated by EIGEN6C4. The assessment against a recently conducted high resolution (∼3 km) terrestrial and airborne gravimetric survey over Ethiopia shows that EIGEN6C4/SGG_UGM_1 and 2 have the highest accuracy (∼3.28/3.27 mGal). However, the comparison with such data hardly discriminates the qualities of other GGMs that have or are truncated to the same degree and order. Whereas, the validation results of GGMs against terrestrial and airborne data are identical. EIGEN6C4, SGG_UGM_2, XGM2016, XGM2019e_2159/SGG_UGM_1 have the best quality, and the accuracy of associated Moho is 4.89/4.90 km, and this value changes to 4.98/4.91/5.51 km when the EGM08/ITSG_Grace2018s/GOCO06S are assessed.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global geopotential models evaluation based on terrestrial gravity data over Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Eyasu Alemu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jag-2022-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The availability of high-degree and recent global geopotential models is a crucial resource for different geodetic and geophysical applications such as modelling of geoid and quasi-geoid and establishing global reference and height systems, estimating Moho depth, gravity anomaly and tectonics, other geopotential functional, and oceanography, which emphasizes the importance for model evaluation. We have therefore estimated complete Bouguer anomalies and Moho whose results are evaluated with the terrestrial values. We validate the recently released satellite-only and high-degree combined GGMs over Ethiopia using terrestrial gravity data based on a statistical comparison of the Bouguer anomaly, its residual and Moho depth. The terrestrial-derived gravity anomaly is more accurately estimated by EIGEN6C4. The assessment against a recently conducted high resolution (∼3 km) terrestrial and airborne gravimetric survey over Ethiopia shows that EIGEN6C4/SGG_UGM_1 and 2 have the highest accuracy (∼3.28/3.27 mGal). However, the comparison with such data hardly discriminates the qualities of other GGMs that have or are truncated to the same degree and order. Whereas, the validation results of GGMs against terrestrial and airborne data are identical. EIGEN6C4, SGG_UGM_2, XGM2016, XGM2019e_2159/SGG_UGM_1 have the best quality, and the accuracy of associated Moho is 4.89/4.90 km, and this value changes to 4.98/4.91/5.51 km when the EGM08/ITSG_Grace2018s/GOCO06S are assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Geodesy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要高度和最新的全球位势模型的可用性是不同大地测量和地球物理应用的重要资源,如大地水准面和准大地水准面建模、建立全球参考和高度系统、估计莫霍深度、重力异常和构造、其他位势函数和海洋学,强调了模型评价的重要性。因此,我们估计了完整的布格异常和莫霍面,其结果用地面值进行了评估。基于布格异常、其残差和莫霍深度的统计比较,我们使用地面重力数据验证了最近发布的埃塞俄比亚上空的仅卫星和高度组合GGM。EIGEN6C4可以更准确地估计地面重力异常。根据最近在埃塞俄比亚上空进行的高分辨率(~3km)地面和航空重力测量进行的评估表明,EIGEN6C4/SGG_UGM_1和2具有最高的精度(~3.28/3.27mGal)。然而,与这些数据的比较很难区分具有或被截断到相同程度和顺序的其他GGM的质量。然而,GGM相对于地面和空中数据的验证结果是相同的。EIGEN6C4、SGG_UGM_2、XGM2016、XGM2019e_2159/SGG_UGM_1具有最好的质量,相关Moho的准确度为4.89/4.90km,当评估EGM08/ITG_Grace2018s/GOCO06S时,该值变为4.98/4.91/5.51km。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global geopotential models evaluation based on terrestrial gravity data over Ethiopia
Abstract The availability of high-degree and recent global geopotential models is a crucial resource for different geodetic and geophysical applications such as modelling of geoid and quasi-geoid and establishing global reference and height systems, estimating Moho depth, gravity anomaly and tectonics, other geopotential functional, and oceanography, which emphasizes the importance for model evaluation. We have therefore estimated complete Bouguer anomalies and Moho whose results are evaluated with the terrestrial values. We validate the recently released satellite-only and high-degree combined GGMs over Ethiopia using terrestrial gravity data based on a statistical comparison of the Bouguer anomaly, its residual and Moho depth. The terrestrial-derived gravity anomaly is more accurately estimated by EIGEN6C4. The assessment against a recently conducted high resolution (∼3 km) terrestrial and airborne gravimetric survey over Ethiopia shows that EIGEN6C4/SGG_UGM_1 and 2 have the highest accuracy (∼3.28/3.27 mGal). However, the comparison with such data hardly discriminates the qualities of other GGMs that have or are truncated to the same degree and order. Whereas, the validation results of GGMs against terrestrial and airborne data are identical. EIGEN6C4, SGG_UGM_2, XGM2016, XGM2019e_2159/SGG_UGM_1 have the best quality, and the accuracy of associated Moho is 4.89/4.90 km, and this value changes to 4.98/4.91/5.51 km when the EGM08/ITSG_Grace2018s/GOCO06S are assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Occurrence characteristics of ionospheric scintillations in the civilian GPS signals (L1, L2, and L5) through a dedicated scintillation monitoring receiver at a low-latitude location in India during the 25th solar cycle A new challenge for cadastral surveying in Taiwan: feasibility analysis using combination on CORS data and online PPP service Monitoring of a rockfill embankment dam using TLS and sUAS point clouds Analyzing recent deformation in Wadi Hagul, Eastern Desert, Egypt, via advanced remote sensing and geodetic data processing Regional evaluation of global geopotential models and three types of digital elevation models with ground-based gravity and GNSS/levelling data using several techniques over Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1