理论与方法:直接测量刺激差异

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102704
Stephen W. Link
{"title":"理论与方法:直接测量刺激差异","authors":"Stephen W. Link","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Stevens’ idea of “direct measurement” of stimulus magnitude is extended to the direct measurement of stimulus differences. An important extension of Wave Theory provides predictions of response probabilities from single direct measures of comparative difference. As an illustration of the method, in an experiment 20 university students compared, only once, each of 16 job pairs, judging which has the larger salary and creating the size of salary differences. The correlation between a theoretical measure of the size of perceived salary difference and the direct measures of perceived salary difference is 0.99. The </span>probability of correctly predicting individual binary choices between jobs, based on the students’ generated measures of perceived stimulus difference, ranges to 1.00 from 0.935. This new theory draws together Stevens and Fechner by showing that they perceived the same underlying psychological events through perfectly related measures of subjective experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory and method: Directly measured stimulus differences\",\"authors\":\"Stephen W. Link\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Stevens’ idea of “direct measurement” of stimulus magnitude is extended to the direct measurement of stimulus differences. An important extension of Wave Theory provides predictions of response probabilities from single direct measures of comparative difference. As an illustration of the method, in an experiment 20 university students compared, only once, each of 16 job pairs, judging which has the larger salary and creating the size of salary differences. The correlation between a theoretical measure of the size of perceived salary difference and the direct measures of perceived salary difference is 0.99. The </span>probability of correctly predicting individual binary choices between jobs, based on the students’ generated measures of perceived stimulus difference, ranges to 1.00 from 0.935. This new theory draws together Stevens and Fechner by showing that they perceived the same underlying psychological events through perfectly related measures of subjective experience.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022249622000475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022249622000475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

史蒂文斯对刺激幅度的“直接测量”思想被扩展到对刺激差异的直接测量。波动理论的一个重要扩展提供了从比较差的单一直接测量中预测响应概率的方法。为了说明该方法,在一项实验中,20名大学生对16对工作中的每对进行了一次比较,以判断哪对工作的工资更高,并得出工资差异的大小。感知薪酬差异大小的理论测量与感知薪酬差异的直接测量之间的相关性为0.99。根据学生对感知刺激差异的测量,正确预测个人在工作之间的二元选择的概率从0.935到1.00不等。这个新理论通过表明他们通过完全相关的主观经验来感知相同的潜在心理事件,从而将史蒂文斯和费希纳聚集在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theory and method: Directly measured stimulus differences

Stevens’ idea of “direct measurement” of stimulus magnitude is extended to the direct measurement of stimulus differences. An important extension of Wave Theory provides predictions of response probabilities from single direct measures of comparative difference. As an illustration of the method, in an experiment 20 university students compared, only once, each of 16 job pairs, judging which has the larger salary and creating the size of salary differences. The correlation between a theoretical measure of the size of perceived salary difference and the direct measures of perceived salary difference is 0.99. The probability of correctly predicting individual binary choices between jobs, based on the students’ generated measures of perceived stimulus difference, ranges to 1.00 from 0.935. This new theory draws together Stevens and Fechner by showing that they perceived the same underlying psychological events through perfectly related measures of subjective experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1