瑞典父母对家庭作业的看法:原则实用主义的表现

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Inquiry Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI:10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275
Judy Sayers, Jöran Petersson, E. Rosenqvist, Paul Andrews
{"title":"瑞典父母对家庭作业的看法:原则实用主义的表现","authors":"Judy Sayers, Jöran Petersson, E. Rosenqvist, Paul Andrews","doi":"10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Motivated by earlier research highlighting Swedish teachers’ beliefs that the setting of homework compromises deep-seated principles of educational equity, this paper presents an exploratory study of Swedish parents’ perspectives on homework in their year-one children’s learning. Twenty-five parents, drawn from three demographically different schools in the Stockholm region, participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews, broadly focused on how parents support their children’s learning and including questions about homework in general and mathematics homework in particular, were transcribed and data subjected to a constant comparison analytical process. This yielded four broad themes, highlighting considerable variation in how parents perceive the relationship between homework and educational equity. First, all parents spoke appreciatively of their children receiving reading homework and, in so doing, indicated a collective construal that reading homework is neither homework nor a threat to equity. Second, four parents, despite their enthusiasm for reading homework, opposed the setting of any homework due to its potential compromise of family life. Third, seven parents indicated that they would appreciate mathematics homework where it were not a threat to equity. Finally, fourteen parents, despite acknowledging homework’s potential compromise to equity, were unequivocally in favour of mathematics homework being set to their children.","PeriodicalId":37203,"journal":{"name":"Education Inquiry","volume":"14 1","pages":"66 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swedish parents’ perspectives on homework: manifestations of principled pragmatism\",\"authors\":\"Judy Sayers, Jöran Petersson, E. Rosenqvist, Paul Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Motivated by earlier research highlighting Swedish teachers’ beliefs that the setting of homework compromises deep-seated principles of educational equity, this paper presents an exploratory study of Swedish parents’ perspectives on homework in their year-one children’s learning. Twenty-five parents, drawn from three demographically different schools in the Stockholm region, participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews, broadly focused on how parents support their children’s learning and including questions about homework in general and mathematics homework in particular, were transcribed and data subjected to a constant comparison analytical process. This yielded four broad themes, highlighting considerable variation in how parents perceive the relationship between homework and educational equity. First, all parents spoke appreciatively of their children receiving reading homework and, in so doing, indicated a collective construal that reading homework is neither homework nor a threat to equity. Second, four parents, despite their enthusiasm for reading homework, opposed the setting of any homework due to its potential compromise of family life. Third, seven parents indicated that they would appreciate mathematics homework where it were not a threat to equity. Finally, fourteen parents, despite acknowledging homework’s potential compromise to equity, were unequivocally in favour of mathematics homework being set to their children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"66 - 84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

早期的研究强调了瑞典教师认为家庭作业的设置损害了教育公平的根深蒂固的原则,因此,本文对瑞典父母对一岁儿童学习中的家庭作业的看法进行了探索性研究。来自斯德哥尔摩地区三所不同学校的25位家长参加了半结构化访谈。访谈主要关注父母如何支持孩子的学习,包括关于家庭作业,特别是数学作业的问题。访谈记录下来,数据经过不断的比较分析过程。这产生了四个广泛的主题,突出了家长如何看待家庭作业与教育公平之间的关系的巨大差异。首先,所有家长都对孩子收到阅读作业表示赞赏,这样做表明了一种集体理解,即阅读作业既不是家庭作业,也不是对公平的威胁。其次,四位家长,尽管他们对阅读家庭作业充满热情,但反对设置任何家庭作业,因为它可能危及家庭生活。第三,7位家长表示,如果数学作业不会对公平造成威胁,他们会欣赏。最后,14位家长,尽管承认家庭作业对公平的潜在妥协,明确地赞成给孩子布置数学作业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Swedish parents’ perspectives on homework: manifestations of principled pragmatism
ABSTRACT Motivated by earlier research highlighting Swedish teachers’ beliefs that the setting of homework compromises deep-seated principles of educational equity, this paper presents an exploratory study of Swedish parents’ perspectives on homework in their year-one children’s learning. Twenty-five parents, drawn from three demographically different schools in the Stockholm region, participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews, broadly focused on how parents support their children’s learning and including questions about homework in general and mathematics homework in particular, were transcribed and data subjected to a constant comparison analytical process. This yielded four broad themes, highlighting considerable variation in how parents perceive the relationship between homework and educational equity. First, all parents spoke appreciatively of their children receiving reading homework and, in so doing, indicated a collective construal that reading homework is neither homework nor a threat to equity. Second, four parents, despite their enthusiasm for reading homework, opposed the setting of any homework due to its potential compromise of family life. Third, seven parents indicated that they would appreciate mathematics homework where it were not a threat to equity. Finally, fourteen parents, despite acknowledging homework’s potential compromise to equity, were unequivocally in favour of mathematics homework being set to their children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Inquiry
Education Inquiry Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Transforming Nordic early childhood education and care in times of marketisation, privatisation and commercialisation Police education reform in Iceland: examining the legitimating principles, contradictions, and tensions in policy discourse Describing teacher educators’ metatalk moves enacted for teaching how to teach concepts Newly qualified secondary school teachers’ perspectives on workplace learning Status beliefs negatively affect expected university attainment of lower class students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1