时变收益可预测性和适应性市场假说:一种新的野生自举似然比方法对MIST国家的证据

Q4 Social Sciences Bogazici Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.21773/BOUN.34.2.1
Oktay Ozkan
{"title":"时变收益可预测性和适应性市场假说:一种新的野生自举似然比方法对MIST国家的证据","authors":"Oktay Ozkan","doi":"10.21773/BOUN.34.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the evolution of the return predictability (or market efficiency) degree for Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, and Turkey (MIST) countries and examines whether the findings are consistent with the implications of adaptive markets hypothesis (AMH). For this purpose, the novel wild bootstrap likelihood ratio approach of Kim and Shamsuddin (2020) is applied on the monthly data from January 1993 to July 2020 with the rolling sub-sample windows method to determine whether the ability of inflation and trading volume to predict stock market returns varies over time. The empirical findings verify that the return predictability (or market efficiency) is time-varying consistent with the implications of the AMH for all MIST countries. This verification is also strengthened by using other predictor variables, namely, exchange rate and realized volatility. This paper reveals that the AMH is more successful in explaining real stock market behavior than efficient markets hypothesis","PeriodicalId":35304,"journal":{"name":"Bogazici Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-varying return predictability and adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence on MIST countries from a novel wild bootstrap likelihood ratio approach\",\"authors\":\"Oktay Ozkan\",\"doi\":\"10.21773/BOUN.34.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the evolution of the return predictability (or market efficiency) degree for Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, and Turkey (MIST) countries and examines whether the findings are consistent with the implications of adaptive markets hypothesis (AMH). For this purpose, the novel wild bootstrap likelihood ratio approach of Kim and Shamsuddin (2020) is applied on the monthly data from January 1993 to July 2020 with the rolling sub-sample windows method to determine whether the ability of inflation and trading volume to predict stock market returns varies over time. The empirical findings verify that the return predictability (or market efficiency) is time-varying consistent with the implications of the AMH for all MIST countries. This verification is also strengthened by using other predictor variables, namely, exchange rate and realized volatility. This paper reveals that the AMH is more successful in explaining real stock market behavior than efficient markets hypothesis\",\"PeriodicalId\":35304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bogazici Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bogazici Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21773/BOUN.34.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bogazici Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21773/BOUN.34.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了墨西哥、印度尼西亚、韩国和土耳其(MIST)国家的收益可预测性(或市场效率)程度的演变,并检验了研究结果是否与适应性市场假说(AMH)的含义一致。为此,将Kim和Shamsuddin(2020)的新颖野生自举似然比方法应用于1993年1月至2020年7月的月度数据,采用滚动子样本窗口方法来确定通货膨胀和交易量预测股市收益的能力是否随时间变化。实证研究结果证实,回报可预测性(或市场效率)是时变的,这与AMH对所有低成本国家的影响是一致的。使用其他预测变量,即汇率和已实现波动率,也加强了这种验证。结果表明,AMH比有效市场假说更能解释股票市场的实际行为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time-varying return predictability and adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence on MIST countries from a novel wild bootstrap likelihood ratio approach
This paper investigates the evolution of the return predictability (or market efficiency) degree for Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, and Turkey (MIST) countries and examines whether the findings are consistent with the implications of adaptive markets hypothesis (AMH). For this purpose, the novel wild bootstrap likelihood ratio approach of Kim and Shamsuddin (2020) is applied on the monthly data from January 1993 to July 2020 with the rolling sub-sample windows method to determine whether the ability of inflation and trading volume to predict stock market returns varies over time. The empirical findings verify that the return predictability (or market efficiency) is time-varying consistent with the implications of the AMH for all MIST countries. This verification is also strengthened by using other predictor variables, namely, exchange rate and realized volatility. This paper reveals that the AMH is more successful in explaining real stock market behavior than efficient markets hypothesis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bogazici Journal
Bogazici Journal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect Of External Crises On Exchange Liquidity Level And Investigation Of Directional Predictability in Türkiye The Effects oOf The Post-2013 Socio-Political Turmoil oOn International Tourism Demand iIn Emerging Economies: An Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Approach Competition Dynamics in the Theatrical Distribution and Exhibition of First- Run Domestic Films Network Neutrality in the Internet with Congestion Sensitive End Users and Content Providers The Brain Drain of IT Professionals: Register Evidence of Non‐Return Graduates from Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1