多元化世界:为什么个人要做他们所做的?

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Latinoamericana de Metodologia de las Ciencias Sociales Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.24215/18537863e030
Bernard Lahire
{"title":"多元化世界:为什么个人要做他们所做的?","authors":"Bernard Lahire","doi":"10.24215/18537863e030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a context of hyper-specialization, the article addresses a panoramic view of society and a complex conception of individuals, while not forgetting both the theoretical ambition and the empirical pulse. To this end, it asks: \"why do individuals do what they do?\", and proposes to respond with a universal formula for the study of practices that combines a dispositional dimension with a contextualist one. On the one hand, the dispositions and competences of individuals, understood as the internalized product of more or less frequent access to certain contexts of action. On the other hand, present contexts of action and their diversity. From this formula, the article evaluates different approaches to the social: on the one hand, the oblivion of the past, characteristic of pragmatist, interactionist and rational choice sociologies; on the other hand, the neglect of contexts, typical of certain uses of Bourdieu's sociology and certain psychoanalytic theories. Finally, the article reviews the diversity of contemporary research in social sciences (in relation to the scale of observation, the level of social reality studied, the interest in knowledge, the type of object, the time scales, the number of actors studied, etc.), showing that the dispositional-contextualist approach can guide works in such different directions.","PeriodicalId":40880,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana de Metodologia de las Ciencias Sociales","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mundo plural: ¿por qué los individuos hacen lo que hacen?\",\"authors\":\"Bernard Lahire\",\"doi\":\"10.24215/18537863e030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a context of hyper-specialization, the article addresses a panoramic view of society and a complex conception of individuals, while not forgetting both the theoretical ambition and the empirical pulse. To this end, it asks: \\\"why do individuals do what they do?\\\", and proposes to respond with a universal formula for the study of practices that combines a dispositional dimension with a contextualist one. On the one hand, the dispositions and competences of individuals, understood as the internalized product of more or less frequent access to certain contexts of action. On the other hand, present contexts of action and their diversity. From this formula, the article evaluates different approaches to the social: on the one hand, the oblivion of the past, characteristic of pragmatist, interactionist and rational choice sociologies; on the other hand, the neglect of contexts, typical of certain uses of Bourdieu's sociology and certain psychoanalytic theories. Finally, the article reviews the diversity of contemporary research in social sciences (in relation to the scale of observation, the level of social reality studied, the interest in knowledge, the type of object, the time scales, the number of actors studied, etc.), showing that the dispositional-contextualist approach can guide works in such different directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latinoamericana de Metodologia de las Ciencias Sociales\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latinoamericana de Metodologia de las Ciencias Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24215/18537863e030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana de Metodologia de las Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/18537863e030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在高度专业化的背景下,本文阐述了社会的全景视图和个人的复杂概念,同时没有忘记理论野心和经验脉搏。为此,它提出了这样的问题:“为什么个人会做他们所做的事情?”,并建议用一个将性格维度与情境主义维度相结合的通用公式来回应实践研究。一方面,个人的性格和能力,被理解为或多或少频繁接触某些行为环境的内化产物。另一方面,目前的行动背景及其多样性。从这个公式出发,本文评价了不同的社会取向:一方面,遗忘过去,实用主义,互动主义和理性选择社会学的特征;另一方面,对语境的忽视,是布迪厄社会学和某些精神分析理论的典型应用。最后,本文回顾了当代社会科学研究的多样性(与观察尺度、研究的社会现实水平、对知识的兴趣、对象类型、时间尺度、研究的行动者数量等有关),表明气质-情境主义方法可以指导这些不同方向的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mundo plural: ¿por qué los individuos hacen lo que hacen?
In a context of hyper-specialization, the article addresses a panoramic view of society and a complex conception of individuals, while not forgetting both the theoretical ambition and the empirical pulse. To this end, it asks: "why do individuals do what they do?", and proposes to respond with a universal formula for the study of practices that combines a dispositional dimension with a contextualist one. On the one hand, the dispositions and competences of individuals, understood as the internalized product of more or less frequent access to certain contexts of action. On the other hand, present contexts of action and their diversity. From this formula, the article evaluates different approaches to the social: on the one hand, the oblivion of the past, characteristic of pragmatist, interactionist and rational choice sociologies; on the other hand, the neglect of contexts, typical of certain uses of Bourdieu's sociology and certain psychoanalytic theories. Finally, the article reviews the diversity of contemporary research in social sciences (in relation to the scale of observation, the level of social reality studied, the interest in knowledge, the type of object, the time scales, the number of actors studied, etc.), showing that the dispositional-contextualist approach can guide works in such different directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cuerpos, silencios y escucha: reflexiones teórico-metodológicas sobre la investigación de la masacre en Colombia Las contribuciones de la perspectiva Bourdieana a la investigación del trabajo infantil en Argentina Metodología y tecnología en el análisis de noticias sobre vacunación contra el COVID De Comte a Bourdieu, en contra de la unidad de método: los derroteros de la epistemología histórica francesa Procesos de hormonización de personas trans y travestis: notas metodológicas sobre el uso de las entrevistas online
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1