白皮书革命的长征:了解中国最近的COVID抗议活动

Eric S. Henry
{"title":"白皮书革命的长征:了解中国最近的COVID抗议活动","authors":"Eric S. Henry","doi":"10.1080/19428200.2022.2186658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One curious aspect of the democracy protests that rocked China in 1989 was the way in which they took so-called China experts by surprise. Frank Pieke, one such China expert and one of my own mentors, was doing fieldwork in Beijing at the time. He only became aware of the protest, which came to be known as the People’s Movement, by chance, after stumbling upon an early demonstration in tian’anmen square while out for a walk. He commented later, “still, there were no indications that the tensions could lead to widespread social unrest in the near future.”1 as we all know, they later did. Beginning on the night of June 3, 1989, and lasting for several days, students occupying downtown Beijing were assaulted and fired upon by soldiers charged with clearing the demonstration by any means necessary. the final death toll will likely never be known, but most unbiased estimates place it at over a thousand.2 I cannot therefore help but feel a sense of déjà vu as I hear about new protest events that happened recently in China. I have to confess they took me by surprise as well given the Chinese government’s focus on promoting what, in the mid-2000s, President Hu Jintao called a “harmonious society,” a strategy of resolving social conflict and inequality through shared prosperity. although I am nearly certain we will not witness bloodshed on the same scale as three decades ago, the future of these protests and their impacts are not easy to predict. I will trace out the larger sociopolitical shifts in contemporary China that have brought us to this moment, while considering how these shifts have the potential to reconfigure the nature of China’s ongoing development. although on their surface the new protests are ostensibly about COVID restrictions and pandemic lockdowns, I would argue they are fundamentally tied to growing disillusionment with the post-tian’anmen social contract that has propelled China to its status as a global power.","PeriodicalId":90439,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology now","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Long March to the White Paper Revolution: Understanding Recent COVID Protests in China\",\"authors\":\"Eric S. Henry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19428200.2022.2186658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One curious aspect of the democracy protests that rocked China in 1989 was the way in which they took so-called China experts by surprise. Frank Pieke, one such China expert and one of my own mentors, was doing fieldwork in Beijing at the time. He only became aware of the protest, which came to be known as the People’s Movement, by chance, after stumbling upon an early demonstration in tian’anmen square while out for a walk. He commented later, “still, there were no indications that the tensions could lead to widespread social unrest in the near future.”1 as we all know, they later did. Beginning on the night of June 3, 1989, and lasting for several days, students occupying downtown Beijing were assaulted and fired upon by soldiers charged with clearing the demonstration by any means necessary. the final death toll will likely never be known, but most unbiased estimates place it at over a thousand.2 I cannot therefore help but feel a sense of déjà vu as I hear about new protest events that happened recently in China. I have to confess they took me by surprise as well given the Chinese government’s focus on promoting what, in the mid-2000s, President Hu Jintao called a “harmonious society,” a strategy of resolving social conflict and inequality through shared prosperity. although I am nearly certain we will not witness bloodshed on the same scale as three decades ago, the future of these protests and their impacts are not easy to predict. I will trace out the larger sociopolitical shifts in contemporary China that have brought us to this moment, while considering how these shifts have the potential to reconfigure the nature of China’s ongoing development. although on their surface the new protests are ostensibly about COVID restrictions and pandemic lockdowns, I would argue they are fundamentally tied to growing disillusionment with the post-tian’anmen social contract that has propelled China to its status as a global power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology now\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19428200.2022.2186658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19428200.2022.2186658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1989年震惊中国的民主抗议活动有一个奇怪的方面,那就是他们让所谓的中国问题专家感到意外。Frank Pieke,一个这样的中国专家,也是我自己的导师之一,当时正在北京做田野调查。他只是在外出散步时偶然发现了天安门广场上的一场早期示威活动后才意识到这场后来被称为“人民运动”的抗议活动。他后来评论说,“不过,没有迹象表明紧张局势会在不久的将来导致广泛的社会动荡。”我们都知道,他们后来做到了。从1989年6月3日晚上开始,持续了好几天,占领北京市中心的学生遭到了士兵的袭击和射击,他们被控以任何必要的手段清除示威人群。最终的死亡人数可能永远不会知道,但最公正的估计是超过1000人因此,当我听到最近在中国发生的新的抗议活动时,我不禁感到一种沮丧。虽然我几乎可以肯定,我们不会看到像30年前那样规模的流血事件,但这些抗议活动的未来及其影响并不容易预测。我将追踪当代中国更大的社会政治变化,这些变化将我们带到了这个时刻,同时考虑这些变化如何有可能重新配置中国正在进行的发展的性质。尽管从表面上看,新的抗议活动表面上是关于COVID限制和大流行封锁的,但我认为,它们从根本上与对后天安门社会契约的日益幻灭有关,而正是这种契约推动了中国成为全球大国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Long March to the White Paper Revolution: Understanding Recent COVID Protests in China
One curious aspect of the democracy protests that rocked China in 1989 was the way in which they took so-called China experts by surprise. Frank Pieke, one such China expert and one of my own mentors, was doing fieldwork in Beijing at the time. He only became aware of the protest, which came to be known as the People’s Movement, by chance, after stumbling upon an early demonstration in tian’anmen square while out for a walk. He commented later, “still, there were no indications that the tensions could lead to widespread social unrest in the near future.”1 as we all know, they later did. Beginning on the night of June 3, 1989, and lasting for several days, students occupying downtown Beijing were assaulted and fired upon by soldiers charged with clearing the demonstration by any means necessary. the final death toll will likely never be known, but most unbiased estimates place it at over a thousand.2 I cannot therefore help but feel a sense of déjà vu as I hear about new protest events that happened recently in China. I have to confess they took me by surprise as well given the Chinese government’s focus on promoting what, in the mid-2000s, President Hu Jintao called a “harmonious society,” a strategy of resolving social conflict and inequality through shared prosperity. although I am nearly certain we will not witness bloodshed on the same scale as three decades ago, the future of these protests and their impacts are not easy to predict. I will trace out the larger sociopolitical shifts in contemporary China that have brought us to this moment, while considering how these shifts have the potential to reconfigure the nature of China’s ongoing development. although on their surface the new protests are ostensibly about COVID restrictions and pandemic lockdowns, I would argue they are fundamentally tied to growing disillusionment with the post-tian’anmen social contract that has propelled China to its status as a global power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching with ChatGPT: Critiquing Generative Artificial Intelligence from the Classroom Anthropology Has One Job (On Genocide in the United States) Traveling Together and Journeying Apart, Revisiting Highway Words, Like Viruses, Spill Over. Consider “Porn” Framing Holism: Sinker, Line and Hook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1