{"title":"不同表面处理方法对硅酸钙基材料微剪切结合强度的影响","authors":"Aliye Tugce Gurcan, Soner Sismanoglu","doi":"10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of various surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of calcium silicate–based materials (CSMs) to resin composite. Two hundred and forty cylindrical acrylic molds were filled with Biodentine, NeoMTA Plus, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal LC, and Well-Root PT. The specimens were divided into four groups: control with no surface treatment, acid-etching, tribochemical silica coating (TSC), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (AL). Resin composite was applied and photo-polymerized. The μSBS was measured and surface alterations were evaluated using a SEM. Data were examined using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at a significance level of 5%. The lowest bond strength values were detected in the controls. Moreover, the lowest μSBS was demonstrated in the untreated NeoMTA Plus group, whereas the aluminum oxide–treated TheraCal LC group exhibited the highest bond strength (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Cohesive failures were observed dominantly for Biodentine and TheraCal LC, adhesive failures in Well-Root PT, and mixed failures for NeoPUTTY MTA. Surface treatments increased the μSBS values of CSMs and affected the micromorphology of the sample surfaces. The study suggests that surface treatments would be advantageous on CSMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","volume":"60 2","pages":"497 - 507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different surface treatment methods on the micro-shear bond strength of calcium silicate–based materials\",\"authors\":\"Aliye Tugce Gurcan, Soner Sismanoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of various surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of calcium silicate–based materials (CSMs) to resin composite. Two hundred and forty cylindrical acrylic molds were filled with Biodentine, NeoMTA Plus, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal LC, and Well-Root PT. The specimens were divided into four groups: control with no surface treatment, acid-etching, tribochemical silica coating (TSC), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (AL). Resin composite was applied and photo-polymerized. The μSBS was measured and surface alterations were evaluated using a SEM. Data were examined using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at a significance level of 5%. The lowest bond strength values were detected in the controls. Moreover, the lowest μSBS was demonstrated in the untreated NeoMTA Plus group, whereas the aluminum oxide–treated TheraCal LC group exhibited the highest bond strength (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Cohesive failures were observed dominantly for Biodentine and TheraCal LC, adhesive failures in Well-Root PT, and mixed failures for NeoPUTTY MTA. Surface treatments increased the μSBS values of CSMs and affected the micromorphology of the sample surfaces. The study suggests that surface treatments would be advantageous on CSMs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"497 - 507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of different surface treatment methods on the micro-shear bond strength of calcium silicate–based materials
The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of various surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of calcium silicate–based materials (CSMs) to resin composite. Two hundred and forty cylindrical acrylic molds were filled with Biodentine, NeoMTA Plus, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal LC, and Well-Root PT. The specimens were divided into four groups: control with no surface treatment, acid-etching, tribochemical silica coating (TSC), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (AL). Resin composite was applied and photo-polymerized. The μSBS was measured and surface alterations were evaluated using a SEM. Data were examined using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at a significance level of 5%. The lowest bond strength values were detected in the controls. Moreover, the lowest μSBS was demonstrated in the untreated NeoMTA Plus group, whereas the aluminum oxide–treated TheraCal LC group exhibited the highest bond strength (p < 0.05). Cohesive failures were observed dominantly for Biodentine and TheraCal LC, adhesive failures in Well-Root PT, and mixed failures for NeoPUTTY MTA. Surface treatments increased the μSBS values of CSMs and affected the micromorphology of the sample surfaces. The study suggests that surface treatments would be advantageous on CSMs.
期刊介绍:
Publishes high quality research and technical papers in all areas of ceramic and related materials
Spans the broad and growing fields of ceramic technology, material science and bioceramics
Chronicles new advances in ceramic materials, manufacturing processes and applications
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society since 1965
Professional language editing service is available through our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts at the author''s cost and does not guarantee that the manuscript will be reviewed or accepted