不同表面处理方法对硅酸钙基材料微剪切结合强度的影响

IF 1.8 4区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society Pub Date : 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0
Aliye Tugce Gurcan, Soner Sismanoglu
{"title":"不同表面处理方法对硅酸钙基材料微剪切结合强度的影响","authors":"Aliye Tugce Gurcan,&nbsp;Soner Sismanoglu","doi":"10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of various surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of calcium silicate–based materials (CSMs) to resin composite. Two hundred and forty cylindrical acrylic molds were filled with Biodentine, NeoMTA Plus, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal LC, and Well-Root PT. The specimens were divided into four groups: control with no surface treatment, acid-etching, tribochemical silica coating (TSC), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (AL). Resin composite was applied and photo-polymerized. The μSBS was measured and surface alterations were evaluated using a SEM. Data were examined using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at a significance level of 5%. The lowest bond strength values were detected in the controls. Moreover, the lowest μSBS was demonstrated in the untreated NeoMTA Plus group, whereas the aluminum oxide–treated TheraCal LC group exhibited the highest bond strength (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Cohesive failures were observed dominantly for Biodentine and TheraCal LC, adhesive failures in Well-Root PT, and mixed failures for NeoPUTTY MTA. Surface treatments increased the μSBS values of CSMs and affected the micromorphology of the sample surfaces. The study suggests that surface treatments would be advantageous on CSMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","volume":"60 2","pages":"497 - 507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different surface treatment methods on the micro-shear bond strength of calcium silicate–based materials\",\"authors\":\"Aliye Tugce Gurcan,&nbsp;Soner Sismanoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of various surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of calcium silicate–based materials (CSMs) to resin composite. Two hundred and forty cylindrical acrylic molds were filled with Biodentine, NeoMTA Plus, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal LC, and Well-Root PT. The specimens were divided into four groups: control with no surface treatment, acid-etching, tribochemical silica coating (TSC), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (AL). Resin composite was applied and photo-polymerized. The μSBS was measured and surface alterations were evaluated using a SEM. Data were examined using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at a significance level of 5%. The lowest bond strength values were detected in the controls. Moreover, the lowest μSBS was demonstrated in the untreated NeoMTA Plus group, whereas the aluminum oxide–treated TheraCal LC group exhibited the highest bond strength (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Cohesive failures were observed dominantly for Biodentine and TheraCal LC, adhesive failures in Well-Root PT, and mixed failures for NeoPUTTY MTA. Surface treatments increased the μSBS values of CSMs and affected the micromorphology of the sample surfaces. The study suggests that surface treatments would be advantageous on CSMs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"497 - 507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-023-00945-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本体外研究旨在评估各种表面处理对硅酸钙基材料(CSM)与树脂复合材料的微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)的影响。在 240 个圆柱形丙烯酸模具中填充了 Biodentine、NeoMTA Plus、NeoPUTTY MTA、TheraCal LC 和 Well-Root PT。试样分为四组:未进行表面处理的对照组、酸蚀组、摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层组(TSC)和氧化铝喷砂组(AL)。涂抹树脂复合材料并进行光聚合。使用扫描电镜测量 μSBS 并评估表面变化。数据采用双向方差分析和 Tukey 检验,显著性水平为 5%。对照组的粘接强度值最低。此外,未经处理的 NeoMTA Plus 组的 μSBS 值最低,而经氧化铝处理的 TheraCal LC 组的粘接强度最高(p < 0.05)。Biodentine 和 TheraCal LC 主要出现粘合失败,Well-Root PT 出现粘合失败,NeoPUTTY MTA 出现混合失败。表面处理增加了 CSM 的 μSBS 值,并影响了样品表面的微观形态。研究表明,表面处理对 CSM 有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of different surface treatment methods on the micro-shear bond strength of calcium silicate–based materials

The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of various surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of calcium silicate–based materials (CSMs) to resin composite. Two hundred and forty cylindrical acrylic molds were filled with Biodentine, NeoMTA Plus, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal LC, and Well-Root PT. The specimens were divided into four groups: control with no surface treatment, acid-etching, tribochemical silica coating (TSC), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (AL). Resin composite was applied and photo-polymerized. The μSBS was measured and surface alterations were evaluated using a SEM. Data were examined using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at a significance level of 5%. The lowest bond strength values were detected in the controls. Moreover, the lowest μSBS was demonstrated in the untreated NeoMTA Plus group, whereas the aluminum oxide–treated TheraCal LC group exhibited the highest bond strength (p < 0.05). Cohesive failures were observed dominantly for Biodentine and TheraCal LC, adhesive failures in Well-Root PT, and mixed failures for NeoPUTTY MTA. Surface treatments increased the μSBS values of CSMs and affected the micromorphology of the sample surfaces. The study suggests that surface treatments would be advantageous on CSMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Publishes high quality research and technical papers in all areas of ceramic and related materials Spans the broad and growing fields of ceramic technology, material science and bioceramics Chronicles new advances in ceramic materials, manufacturing processes and applications Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society since 1965 Professional language editing service is available through our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts at the author''s cost and does not guarantee that the manuscript will be reviewed or accepted
期刊最新文献
Probing higher valences of uranium in nuclear materials using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy Evaluation of the in vitro cytotoxicity and drug delivery of ytterbium (III)-doped versatile bioactive glasses for cancer treatment Rapid tetracycline degradation by S-scheme Se/g-C3N4 heterostructure Modeling of calcium phosphate based on an LCD 3D printer using brushite and calcium hydroxide Assessment of antioxidant activity, thrombogenicity and MTT assay of bioceramic phosphate as a biomaterial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1