基于模糊多准则决策方法的人为误差预测变量因果关系建模

A. Soltanzadeh, Mohsen Sadeghi Yarandi, Mostafa Mirzaei Aliabadi, M. Mahdinia
{"title":"基于模糊多准则决策方法的人为误差预测变量因果关系建模","authors":"A. Soltanzadeh, Mohsen Sadeghi Yarandi, Mostafa Mirzaei Aliabadi, M. Mahdinia","doi":"10.1080/1463922X.2021.1938281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Human error is the result of different variables the study of which helps prevent committing such errors. This study aimed at modeling the cause-and-effect relationships among different variables that can predict human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. The study was carried out based on the opinions of 17 safety experts in 2020. The variables of the study were determined by reviewing previous research and the expert panel’s brainstorming process. The results revealed that among 14 studied variables, shift work, job satisfaction, environmental discomfort and role conflict can be singled out as the root causes of human error. Although human error is affected by each studied variable, each variable can influence human error differently. Hence, safety and controlling measures presented to reduce and prevent human error need to take into account the different roles and influence weight of variables. The result of this study is applicable to researchers and managers in different work environments.","PeriodicalId":22852,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"259 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1938281","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling cause-and-effect relationships among predictive variables of human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method\",\"authors\":\"A. Soltanzadeh, Mohsen Sadeghi Yarandi, Mostafa Mirzaei Aliabadi, M. Mahdinia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1463922X.2021.1938281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Human error is the result of different variables the study of which helps prevent committing such errors. This study aimed at modeling the cause-and-effect relationships among different variables that can predict human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. The study was carried out based on the opinions of 17 safety experts in 2020. The variables of the study were determined by reviewing previous research and the expert panel’s brainstorming process. The results revealed that among 14 studied variables, shift work, job satisfaction, environmental discomfort and role conflict can be singled out as the root causes of human error. Although human error is affected by each studied variable, each variable can influence human error differently. Hence, safety and controlling measures presented to reduce and prevent human error need to take into account the different roles and influence weight of variables. The result of this study is applicable to researchers and managers in different work environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1938281\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1938281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1938281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要人为错误是不同变量的结果,研究这些变量有助于防止犯下此类错误。本研究旨在基于模糊多准则决策方法,对能够预测人为失误的不同变量之间的因果关系进行建模。这项研究是根据2020年17位安全专家的意见进行的。这项研究的变量是通过回顾以前的研究和专家小组的头脑风暴过程来确定的。结果表明,在14个研究变量中,轮班工作、工作满意度、环境不适和角色冲突可以被单独列为人为错误的根本原因。尽管人为错误受到每个研究变量的影响,但每个变量对人为错误的影响不同。因此,为减少和防止人为错误而提出的安全和控制措施需要考虑变量的不同作用和影响权重。这项研究的结果适用于不同工作环境中的研究人员和管理人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling cause-and-effect relationships among predictive variables of human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method
Abstract Human error is the result of different variables the study of which helps prevent committing such errors. This study aimed at modeling the cause-and-effect relationships among different variables that can predict human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. The study was carried out based on the opinions of 17 safety experts in 2020. The variables of the study were determined by reviewing previous research and the expert panel’s brainstorming process. The results revealed that among 14 studied variables, shift work, job satisfaction, environmental discomfort and role conflict can be singled out as the root causes of human error. Although human error is affected by each studied variable, each variable can influence human error differently. Hence, safety and controlling measures presented to reduce and prevent human error need to take into account the different roles and influence weight of variables. The result of this study is applicable to researchers and managers in different work environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Conceptual framework for the design and development of sustainability-oriented products: toward EQUID 4.0 Trust building with artificial intelligence: comparing with human in investment behaviour, emotional arousal and neuro activities Establishing driving simulator validity: drawbacks of null-hypothesis significance testing when compared to equivalence tests and Bayes factors The influence of industry 4.0, internet of things, and physical-cyber systems on human factors: a case study of workers in Indonesian oil and gas refineries A theoretical model of industrial accidents investigations: a conceptualization of the mental processes that trigger and control investigative activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1