应用欧洲规范第7条一般规则的垂直防波堤的稳定性

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Acta Hydrotechnica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.15292/acta.hydro.2022.04
Davor Kvočka, D. Žagar
{"title":"应用欧洲规范第7条一般规则的垂直防波堤的稳定性","authors":"Davor Kvočka, D. Žagar","doi":"10.15292/acta.hydro.2022.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breakwaters are hydraulic structures designed to protect coastlines and coastal infrastructure, which are constantly exposed to the forces of the sea. Breakwaters are consequently subjected to a variety of hydrodynamic loads, wherefore breakwater stability must be prioritized during the breakwater design process. In this study, we examined the difference in the safety factor against overturning and sliding when the commonly used approach for calculating breakwater stability specified in BS 6349 was updated with the partial safety factors outlined in Eurocode 7. Our comparative analysis employed three different methods to calculate the hydrodynamic loads: the Sainflou method, the extended Goda method without the breakwater overtopping, and the extended Goda method with consideration of breakwater overtopping. The breakwater stability was calculated and compared for different breakwater widths, with constant wave parameters being used in all stability calculations. Within the stability calculations, we considered only overturning and sliding instability mechanisms. The obtained results show that there is no significant difference in the calculated breakwater stability coefficient between the two considered calculation procedures regardless of the method used for the calculation of the hydrodynamic loads. In order to develop a comprehensive approach for the calculation of breakwater stability based on the rules outlined in the Eurocodes, it would be necessary to determine the key processes and numerical models for calculating the stability of the foundation soil and to consider more precisely the impacts related to the breakwater shape and construction technique, construction materials, and local characteristics of the seabed.","PeriodicalId":36671,"journal":{"name":"Acta Hydrotechnica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of vertical breakwaters by applying the general rules of Eurocode 7\",\"authors\":\"Davor Kvočka, D. Žagar\",\"doi\":\"10.15292/acta.hydro.2022.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Breakwaters are hydraulic structures designed to protect coastlines and coastal infrastructure, which are constantly exposed to the forces of the sea. Breakwaters are consequently subjected to a variety of hydrodynamic loads, wherefore breakwater stability must be prioritized during the breakwater design process. In this study, we examined the difference in the safety factor against overturning and sliding when the commonly used approach for calculating breakwater stability specified in BS 6349 was updated with the partial safety factors outlined in Eurocode 7. Our comparative analysis employed three different methods to calculate the hydrodynamic loads: the Sainflou method, the extended Goda method without the breakwater overtopping, and the extended Goda method with consideration of breakwater overtopping. The breakwater stability was calculated and compared for different breakwater widths, with constant wave parameters being used in all stability calculations. Within the stability calculations, we considered only overturning and sliding instability mechanisms. The obtained results show that there is no significant difference in the calculated breakwater stability coefficient between the two considered calculation procedures regardless of the method used for the calculation of the hydrodynamic loads. In order to develop a comprehensive approach for the calculation of breakwater stability based on the rules outlined in the Eurocodes, it would be necessary to determine the key processes and numerical models for calculating the stability of the foundation soil and to consider more precisely the impacts related to the breakwater shape and construction technique, construction materials, and local characteristics of the seabed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Hydrotechnica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Hydrotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15292/acta.hydro.2022.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Hydrotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15292/acta.hydro.2022.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

防波堤是为了保护海岸线和沿海基础设施而设计的水力结构,它们经常暴露在大海的力量之下。因此,防波堤受到各种水动力载荷的作用,因此在防波堤设计过程中必须优先考虑防波堤的稳定性。在这项研究中,我们检查了当BS 6349中规定的计算防波堤稳定性的常用方法被更新为欧洲规范7中概述的部分安全系数时,抗倾覆和滑动安全系数的差异。对比分析采用了三种不同的水动力荷载计算方法:Sainflou法、不考虑防波堤过顶的扩展Goda法和考虑防波堤过顶的扩展Goda法。计算并比较了不同防波堤宽度下的防波堤稳定性,所有稳定性计算均采用定波参数。在稳定性计算中,我们只考虑了倾覆和滑动失稳机制。所得结果表明,无论采用何种水动力荷载计算方法,两种计算方法计算出的防波堤稳定系数没有显著差异。为了根据欧洲规范中概述的规则制定计算防波堤稳定性的综合方法,有必要确定计算基础土壤稳定性的关键过程和数值模型,并更精确地考虑与防波堤形状和施工技术,建筑材料和海底局部特征相关的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stability of vertical breakwaters by applying the general rules of Eurocode 7
Breakwaters are hydraulic structures designed to protect coastlines and coastal infrastructure, which are constantly exposed to the forces of the sea. Breakwaters are consequently subjected to a variety of hydrodynamic loads, wherefore breakwater stability must be prioritized during the breakwater design process. In this study, we examined the difference in the safety factor against overturning and sliding when the commonly used approach for calculating breakwater stability specified in BS 6349 was updated with the partial safety factors outlined in Eurocode 7. Our comparative analysis employed three different methods to calculate the hydrodynamic loads: the Sainflou method, the extended Goda method without the breakwater overtopping, and the extended Goda method with consideration of breakwater overtopping. The breakwater stability was calculated and compared for different breakwater widths, with constant wave parameters being used in all stability calculations. Within the stability calculations, we considered only overturning and sliding instability mechanisms. The obtained results show that there is no significant difference in the calculated breakwater stability coefficient between the two considered calculation procedures regardless of the method used for the calculation of the hydrodynamic loads. In order to develop a comprehensive approach for the calculation of breakwater stability based on the rules outlined in the Eurocodes, it would be necessary to determine the key processes and numerical models for calculating the stability of the foundation soil and to consider more precisely the impacts related to the breakwater shape and construction technique, construction materials, and local characteristics of the seabed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Hydrotechnica
Acta Hydrotechnica Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Free-flow discharge characteristics of an overshot gate: A non-hydrostatic numerical modeling approach Grey Water Footprint of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Wasterwater in Sava River Basin Co-digestion of wastewater sludge with food waste and green cuttings: optimization of methane production Stability of vertical breakwaters by applying the general rules of Eurocode 7 Flood Risk Zoning Using Geographical Information System Case Study: Khorramabad Flood in April 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1