审视家庭-专业伙伴关系在专业组织标准中的体现

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Special Education Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1177/00224669231165502
G. Francis, M. Burke, Ling Zhang, R. Carter, Chak Li, A. Turnbull
{"title":"审视家庭-专业伙伴关系在专业组织标准中的体现","authors":"G. Francis, M. Burke, Ling Zhang, R. Carter, Chak Li, A. Turnbull","doi":"10.1177/00224669231165502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigating the extent to which professional organization standards reflect family–professional partnerships can identify opportunities for professional organizations to enrich a focus on partnerships, thus better-preparing education professionals to fulfill partnerships with families. The researchers employed a document analysis method to investigate two research questions: (a) What percentage of education professional organization standards and substandards reflect family–professional partnerships? and (b) To what extent do education professional organization substandards align with the five dimensions of family–professional partnerships? Key findings indicated that the (a) Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium and (b) National Association of School Psychologists had the greatest number of standards reflecting partnerships and “commitment” was most frequently dimension reflected in substandards. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Reflection of Family–Professional Partnerships in Professional Organization Standards\",\"authors\":\"G. Francis, M. Burke, Ling Zhang, R. Carter, Chak Li, A. Turnbull\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00224669231165502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investigating the extent to which professional organization standards reflect family–professional partnerships can identify opportunities for professional organizations to enrich a focus on partnerships, thus better-preparing education professionals to fulfill partnerships with families. The researchers employed a document analysis method to investigate two research questions: (a) What percentage of education professional organization standards and substandards reflect family–professional partnerships? and (b) To what extent do education professional organization substandards align with the five dimensions of family–professional partnerships? Key findings indicated that the (a) Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium and (b) National Association of School Psychologists had the greatest number of standards reflecting partnerships and “commitment” was most frequently dimension reflected in substandards. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Special Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669231165502\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669231165502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查专业组织标准在多大程度上反映了家庭-专业伙伴关系,可以为专业组织提供机会,丰富对伙伴关系的关注,从而更好地为教育专业人员与家庭建立伙伴关系做好准备。研究人员采用文献分析方法调查了两个研究问题:(a)教育专业组织标准和子标准反映家庭-职业伙伴关系的百分比是多少?以及(b)教育专业组织的子标准在多大程度上与家庭-专业伙伴关系的五个方面相一致?主要调查结果表明,(a)州际教师评估和支持联盟和(b)全国学校心理学家协会拥有最多的反映伙伴关系的标准,“承诺”最常体现在次级标准中。讨论了研究的意义和未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Reflection of Family–Professional Partnerships in Professional Organization Standards
Investigating the extent to which professional organization standards reflect family–professional partnerships can identify opportunities for professional organizations to enrich a focus on partnerships, thus better-preparing education professionals to fulfill partnerships with families. The researchers employed a document analysis method to investigate two research questions: (a) What percentage of education professional organization standards and substandards reflect family–professional partnerships? and (b) To what extent do education professional organization substandards align with the five dimensions of family–professional partnerships? Key findings indicated that the (a) Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium and (b) National Association of School Psychologists had the greatest number of standards reflecting partnerships and “commitment” was most frequently dimension reflected in substandards. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Special Education
Journal of Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Special Education (JSE) is a multidisciplinary publication presenting primary research and scholarly reviews related to special education. The goal of this journal is to add to current scholarship and provide a sense of emerging directions in the field. Manuscripts initially are screened for (a) appropriateness of content for JSE, (b) adherence to guidelines specified in the APA publication manual, (c) readability of text, and (d) explicit statement of implications for the practice of special education.
期刊最新文献
A Meta-Analysis of the Graduated Guidance Procedure An Analysis of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction Coaching Model Principles in High School Classrooms A Case Study on the Museum Commentary Scenario for People with Developmental Disabilities The Effect of Self-regulated Strategy Development on Word-Problem Solving in Children at Risk of Mathematical Learning Disabilities Trends and Tasks in Intervention Research to Enhance Peer Interactions for Elementary Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1